Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

[GoldThumb]

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

let me in M - it wisnae me.

And he’ll be getting another aviation award next year if it was.

She’ll hoof his arse that hard, he’ll need a parachute for the journey back down.

I hadn’t realised how often he settled till I read this from Mark Savage at the BBC.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68676287

Advocating violence is never acceptable. It's especially horrible when the suggestion comes from one woman (?) and directed towards another.

😂😂😂😂

You are right.

Advocating violence is not acceptable. I should know.

And you are right. I am a woman. Well done.

On yer way with your creepy wee brackets. I have no desire to be involved in a manufactured argument with you.

It is a saying ONLY up here. Meaning that someone has done something to really displeasure you.

And to the best of my knowledge it is saying only, no one does it ‘physically’ and I would state with certainty that a parachute would never be required if it did happen.

Unless of course you’d like to discuss sensibly how Meghan must feel with her husband peculiarly being associated with diddy sex parties and named in court documents?

A Prince amongst men.

I'm going to have a wild guess and say it's not a literal suggestion!

Metaphor: noun
A figure of speech that describes an object or action in a way that isn't literally true

I just saw on another thread that WME represents Meghan Sussex, Blake Lively and P. Diddy. I didn't know that. Or had forgotten I knew that.

So I shall retract and say that he can gain another aviation award jumping through hoops trying to smooth things over at home.

John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Kim Kardashian.

Also Sheryl Crow

Also it was ( advocating??!) violence ( 🙄) towards Harry anyway !
I'm sure he's not a woman.

Most odd how they all seem to be mysteriously connected.

No publicity is bad publicity maybe still holds in some arenas.

Back in the real world…

I’m neither pro or against Monarchy, the whole battle between fans of one brother against the other very juvenile.
But I really Wonder where are all the posters who have Sworn the affair rumors are all over Europe and US and everyone is talking about it except the UK, like the UK is some sort of Dictatorship.

now that Harry’s name is mentioned in what is known as Freak off parties , everyone is suddenly so quite. It could be all harmless or it could be that he is Guilty, no one knows really, but all I see is William still being continuously accused of having an Affair , blamed for being a controlling husband , and Harry is praised for being good and faithful , but based on what exactly ? Why is Harry and Meghan not treated in the same context as William and Catherine?

it’s all rumors and no one saw anything ..yet in both cases.
It’s so intriguing .

I’d hope that even those who love the gossip and adore the “no smoke without fire” when the rumours suit their agendas would hold back on any linking to a sex trafficking gossip. That is a huge leap from a damaging affair rumour and criminal behaviour.

I’m neither pro or against Monarchy, the whole battle between fans of one brother against the other very juvenile.

Twitter looks more like “fans of one brother against everyone else.”

@Vespanest How do you mean? The affair rumors are fair game but not the sex trafficking ones?

It wasn’t just affair rumours, although that would have been bad enough. They constantly try to get the particular sexual preference thing trending, they were pushing stories of domestic violence, murder, illegitimate children…all completely baseless. If H is stupid enough to hang out with people accused of crimes it’s tough on him if it comes back to bite.

No, I hate the no smoke without fire it’s been used as a trope excuse for rape since forever, but I hope that those who would join any affair rumours of Harry would draw a line at getting involved in sex trafficking

I never saw anyone spreading or discussion affair rumors about Harry. Nor sex trafficking. Everyone here seemed to agree his name was like dropped into the suit to give it publicity.

People haven’t been so kind to William though.

Affair rumours have dogged William for several years. Harry’s never been accused afaik.

I was giving a reason why it is not happening, not that it is happening

I haven’t heard affair rumours about Harry either. I assumed the poster was saying that affair rumours about William aren’t comparable with sex trafficking rumours about Harry. Sorry if I misunderstood.

No one is accusing Harry of any wrong doing , no one really knows anything about his private life ,it could be that he and Meg are both in bed by 9 watching HBO and eating nachos or maybe he’s out partying every night. Likewise William and Catherine.
a dumb person <Giles> said the affair is true in a tweet and people to this day are taking it as gospel, Now it’s Harry’s name that is mentioned as a guest in these parties, i just find the Whole reaction to both brothers not symmetrical .