Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Photoshoot for the Sussex Children?

1000 replies

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 16:03

I actually hope this isn't true. It's one thing I've always admired of the Sussexes, that they have (generally) protected their children's privacy very effectively.

I hope its not related to the new commercial venture.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13220519/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Meghan-Markle-photoshoot-Archie-Lilibet.html

EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: Meghan Markle has photoshoot of Archie and Lilibet

EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: The photo-shoot, at Prince Harry and Meghan's mansion in Montecito, coincided with the launch of Meghan's lifestyle and cookery brand, American Riviera Orchard.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13220519/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Meghan-Markle-photoshoot-Archie-Lilibet.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
LadyChatterjee · 22/03/2024 20:14

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

GoldThumb · 22/03/2024 20:18

Spectre8 · 22/03/2024 20:04

No cos I did Google it and I cant see anywhere where it states he is their official spokesperson....so that is why I'm asking u cos I clearly missed it

Pretty sure he was name checked in one of Harry’s lawsuits?

That he was briefed by Harry/his team and tweeted within hours.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/03/2024 20:18

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 19:50

More gaslighting. Omid Scobie has centered himself in the middle of all news regarding the Sussexes. From announcements about catastrophic car chases and Leged of Aviation awards to writing 2 books that practically positions his head up their arses in permeant genuflection.

Mymilkshake you forgot to mention the court processes Scobie knew about within minutes, leading Justice Warby to say "The inference invited is that he had been provided with a copy by representatives of the claimant ... This seems very likely"

And yet despite this - not to mention Meghan's lie to the court about collaborating - there are still some who insist H&M barely know who he is

Go figure ...

ZipZapZoom · 22/03/2024 20:19

Spectre8 · 22/03/2024 20:11

So your making an assumption but you don't know however this assumption is okay to now be a fact.

Right okay... lets just ignore he built a career being a royal commentator long before meghan was on the scene

Along with all the posts that could only have come from Harry and Meghan and the information from the court cases etc? How much evidence do you need?

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's hardly a blooming dog. 🤨

(Disclaimer it was very hard to write duck and not dick...)

ArcaneWireless · 22/03/2024 20:24

There is always an underlying tone to OS.

If that isn’t what royal commentators are about then thank goodness he stepped down. Not that I was aware of him before his association with H&M.

He is the sort of person you’d whisper in the ear of when you can’t be arsed to go to the shops for a voodoo doll.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 20:24

@Puzzledandpissedoff you are of course correct. And let's see, Scobie was one of only 3 (I think) handpicked journalists who were allowed to attend MM's last engagement as a working royal. And she kindly phoned him when he was ill to check if he was ok. I bet the other royal correspondents don't get that sort of treatment.

And only two people could have leaked the contents of the correspondence between MM and Prince/King Charles to Scobie. I'm guessing it wasn't Charles.

And who else but the only 4 people in the car - William, Catherine, Meghan and Harry - knew that they drove back to Windsor in silence after the royal walkabout following QEII's death, and leaked that to Scobie for Endgame? IT wasn't going to be W&C now, was it?

StormzyinaTCup · 22/03/2024 20:26

He is the sort of person you’d whisper in the ear of when you can’t be arsed to go to the shops for a voodoo doll.

Brilliant😂😂

IsoldeWagner · 22/03/2024 20:26

They admitted they fed him information for Finding Freedom (sic) didn't they?
Is that the one where Meghan misled the court?.

Wickedlywearynamechange · 22/03/2024 20:29

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

i just went back on his twitter time line to March 11 and found no ticking alarm clock. Is it further back than that?

BlazenWeights · 22/03/2024 20:34

themessygarden · 21/03/2024 16:58

I just don't get why it's announced that some top fashion photographer has taken photos of their kids, maybe it is a dig at Catherine who takes amateur photos of her children and all the recent furore about the family photographs.

Edited

Oops I now see how 1 + 1 can equal 11. What an assumption !! 😳

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/03/2024 20:38

IsoldeWagner · 22/03/2024 20:26

They admitted they fed him information for Finding Freedom (sic) didn't they?
Is that the one where Meghan misled the court?.

Yes that's the one - except H&M tried to claim they hadn't actually provided info to Scobie because it was Jason Knauf they were communicating through

Which all got a bit spoiled when the email from Harry was divulged, insisting that "we have to be able to say we didn’t have anything to do with it"

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/meghan-markle-jason-knauf-finding-freedom-correspondence-letter-b965692.html#r3z-addoor

Read: Meghan’s correspondence with aide over Markle letter and biography

The Duchess of Sussex apologised to the Court of Appeal yesterday after a series of explosive revelations in her privacy battle with the Mail on Sunday.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/meghan-markle-jason-knauf-finding-freedom-correspondence-letter-b965692.html#r3z-addoor

IsoldeWagner · 22/03/2024 20:39

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/03/2024 20:38

Yes that's the one - except H&M tried to claim they hadn't actually provided info to Scobie because it was Jason Knauf they were communicating through

Which all got a bit spoiled when the email from Harry was divulged, insisting that "we have to be able to say we didn’t have anything to do with it"

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/meghan-markle-jason-knauf-finding-freedom-correspondence-letter-b965692.html#r3z-addoor

😮

LadyChatterjee · 22/03/2024 20:40

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

LadyChatterjee · 22/03/2024 20:41

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

LadyChatterjee · 22/03/2024 20:53

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

ArcaneWireless · 22/03/2024 21:09

Some will be crowing.

Doubt it’ll be a rooster.

PrestonHood121 · 22/03/2024 21:11

Like they didnt use photoshop for that photo...is harry wearing a wig?

LadyChatterjee · 22/03/2024 21:16

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/03/2024 21:28

Is Omid employed by any major media company that could take him to task too?

Apparently he went freelance in 2017, but still contributes to Harper's Bazaar, Yahoo News and ABC in the US - plus of course his puerile dribblings on Twitter, which I only see reported on here because I've got it blocked

Whether any of those will cease using him remains to be seen, but I doubt it; his repulsive style is hardly unknown and presumably they at least enjoy it

Edited to add that deleting remarks hardly makes much difference - not once other media/individuals have taken screenshots

Spectre8 · 22/03/2024 21:36

So it seems pretty clear he isn't a spokesperson for them, since its now reported a spokesperson for them has released their statement wishing kate well and that spokesperson clearly isn't scobie.

ZipZapZoom · 22/03/2024 21:40

Spectre8 · 22/03/2024 21:36

So it seems pretty clear he isn't a spokesperson for them, since its now reported a spokesperson for them has released their statement wishing kate well and that spokesperson clearly isn't scobie.

You can have more than one spokesperson...

Bananabreadandstrawberries · 22/03/2024 21:42

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 16:03

I actually hope this isn't true. It's one thing I've always admired of the Sussexes, that they have (generally) protected their children's privacy very effectively.

I hope its not related to the new commercial venture.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13220519/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Meghan-Markle-photoshoot-Archie-Lilibet.html

Can’t believe the nerve of this couple “the Sussexes”, with the health troubles of the royal family to try and steal some airspace at this time.

They should go and live their private lives in obscurity without dragging out the titles that the royal family have gifted them.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 21:42

@Spectre8 . Please just stop. It's as clear as day who he speaks for and from where he gets his information. It's been clear for years.

GoldThumb · 22/03/2024 21:43

Spectre8 · 22/03/2024 21:36

So it seems pretty clear he isn't a spokesperson for them, since its now reported a spokesperson for them has released their statement wishing kate well and that spokesperson clearly isn't scobie.

Okay. Not a spokesperson.

A ‘person who is briefed by them, and reports what they tell him to’ just doesn’t roll off the tongue as easily though

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread