Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Rose Hanbury is everywhere!

372 replies

Missingprincess · 14/03/2024 08:52

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/lady-rose-hanbury-marchioness-of-cholmondeley-princess-kate-best-friend-childhood-children-marriage-b1144827.html

Yet another piece! What are they trying to tell us without telling us?
Rose went to Stowe so presumably had a knowledge of Wills inner circle growing up.. But why all the articles!

Lady Rose Hanbury: Kate’s party-loving close friend with a Saltburn-esque upbringing

While the Marchioness of Cholmondeley is one of Kate Middleton’s best-known associates, they couldn’t be less alike. Maddy Mussen reports on the flamboyant life of her party-loving lookalike

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/lady-rose-hanbury-marchioness-of-cholmondeley-princess-kate-best-friend-childhood-children-marriage-b1144827.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
BenefitWaffle · 14/03/2024 19:34

Sorry it was @Salemforcuddles who said that.
You simply made vague accusations that I "am talking unsubstianted rubbish about 2 women". That is not true.

ReverseFerrets · 14/03/2024 19:35

BenefitWaffle · 14/03/2024 19:34

Sorry it was @Salemforcuddles who said that.
You simply made vague accusations that I "am talking unsubstianted rubbish about 2 women". That is not true.

We'll have to agree to disagree. All anyone has on this so called "affair" is tabloid rag gossip and online rumours that stemmed from a lie. If you have anything more, feel free to post it.

HelenaCh9 · 14/03/2024 19:36

I assumed that they were hinting at an affair but couldn’t write about it openly for legal reasons. However, there have been interesting and educational (to me, as someone with neither media nor IT chops) posts about how SEO works in practice.

I’ve also leant something about photo/press standards in the last week, following the doctored image furore and the kill notice.

Also, there have been excellent posts about first amendment issues and libel following the US comedian’s comments.

I didn’t realise how debilitating Crohns was until a few posters explained it from their viewpoint. I just thought it was akin to a dodgy tummy. I know better now.

I’ve also seen a load of tripe posted, but it’s been worth hanging out on these threads for the informative stuff.

I’ll be honest though, I feel like I’m watching a woman’s demise (not literal) from the sidelines and even as an anti-monarchist it’s making me pretty sad despite being interested in some aspects. So I’m gonna avoid the royal elements on SM.

eise · 14/03/2024 19:40

BenefitWaffle · 14/03/2024 19:06

Are you saying that anyone saying anything negative about William is bullying Kate?

Yes apparently so. Kate can't be discussed ever in a negative way. Yet there's a thread right now criticising Meghan about her website being shit or whatever. They haven't even seen anything or what it's about. Apparently that's ok, just say nothing negative about W+K.

Salemforcuddles · 14/03/2024 19:45

You are just making it up as you go along

If you really bothered to properly read the thread you are talking about you would see that I have defended Meghan. See how it works , women not tearing women apart?

TallerSally · 14/03/2024 19:59

Novella4 · 14/03/2024 19:27

@ReverseFerrets

No forced them to release a doctored photo
No one forced William to claim he took said photo.
No one forced a William to then let Kate the blame

This is all on the ‘royals’ and it’s been a long time coming

Indeed.

KP issued a fake photo as “proof of life” purportedly to quell the increasingly out of control speculation about Kate’s whereabouts, speculation which was the direct result of KP’s gaslighting the public about what’s going on with Kate. A display of gross mismanagement and arrogance from the KP comms team which compares unfavourably to the approach BP took with King Charles’ illness.

Not only did KP issue a fake photo (then blame Kate), they issued one in which Kate wasn’t wearing her wedding rings. Let that sink in for a moment, as a cunning plan to quell rumours and speculation.

Given this context, anyone surprised or outraged that the William affair rumours have resurfaced is…. ahem… misjudging the way rumours and gossip work in today’s SM and click bait age?…

Of course, KP have 100% brought this on themselves. Or correction, onto the principals they are supposed to protect:Kate, William, the other aristos in question.

Responsibility starts and stops with KP and the dog’s breakfast they’ve made of communicating around Kate’s illness and recovery.

I suspect the press are well aware of this, and are piling even more pressure on them, with, indeed, unfortunate collateral damage.

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:07

I reported a thread here last year that contained links to a forum with some very ugly rumors about Harry and Meghan. That’s stuff happens all the time, you just don’t always see it because the mods are on top of things.

Posters keep saying no one can say bad things about Kate but it’s open season on them. It just not true. Plenty of people do try to stop the type of gossip about H&M that is going on now about W&K now.

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:15

Plenty doesn't get deleted I can tell you

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:16

Not today, Rousette. Not today.

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:22

Alice

You will not shut me down from giving an opinion on a discussion forum.
I will carry on doing so, whatever you say

I think that there have been plenty of posts and threads about Meghan & Harry that don't, but should get deleted and I've had reasonable discussions with mnhq about it in the past

Do stop trying to shut down my opinion because I irritate you with my views.
Which differ to yours.
Ok? I am sure we can live with agreeing to disagree without 'not today', we are sensible women
All the best to you
😊

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:23

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:22

Alice

You will not shut me down from giving an opinion on a discussion forum.
I will carry on doing so, whatever you say

I think that there have been plenty of posts and threads about Meghan & Harry that don't, but should get deleted and I've had reasonable discussions with mnhq about it in the past

Do stop trying to shut down my opinion because I irritate you with my views.
Which differ to yours.
Ok? I am sure we can live with agreeing to disagree without 'not today', we are sensible women
All the best to you
😊

What in the world? You got that out of my comment?

Marchintospring · 14/03/2024 20:27

The marriage is fucked, William is fucked. Possibly the whole monarchy.
Sad times. Poor Kate.

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:29

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:23

What in the world? You got that out of my comment?

Yes
Quite obviously

It is addressed to me and saying twice 'not today Roussette, not today' after I posted in response to you.

I wish you all the best as I say.
Let's leave it

ChVrches · 14/03/2024 20:30

WhatZEEEE · 14/03/2024 17:52

but what if its david actually???? not rose

Hot Shots Idiot GIF

.

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:32

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:29

Yes
Quite obviously

It is addressed to me and saying twice 'not today Roussette, not today' after I posted in response to you.

I wish you all the best as I say.
Let's leave it

Let me know if you find there were any posts or threads removed here about Catherine today. Because from what I can see all of the vast bullying going on right here stands.

Now, let’s absolutely leave it unless you know otherwise.

ChVrches · 14/03/2024 20:33

You know @Roussette you said above to a poster

"You will not shut me down from giving an opinion on a discussion forum"

but then you say to the same poster "Let's leave it" which is an attempt to shut them down

and then if they don't, you accuse them of a personal attack. I'm really not understanding these T and G that are constantly referred to. It's all so confusing on here.

ReverseFerrets · 14/03/2024 20:34

Or maybe, @TallerSally she posted a Mother’s Day photo like she does every year, and it’s the venal press, starved of interesting royal news and access to their favourite royal woman, that have manufactured an outrage to manipulate a narrative to flush out a reaction, aided and abetted by utter wankers on SM.

RockyandBullwinkle · 14/03/2024 20:34

Roussette · 14/03/2024 20:15

Plenty doesn't get deleted I can tell you

The Nanny 90S GIF

.

TallerSally · 14/03/2024 20:35

ReverseFerrets · 14/03/2024 20:34

Or maybe, @TallerSally she posted a Mother’s Day photo like she does every year, and it’s the venal press, starved of interesting royal news and access to their favourite royal woman, that have manufactured an outrage to manipulate a narrative to flush out a reaction, aided and abetted by utter wankers on SM.

Geez, you nailed it!

MrsFinkelstein · 14/03/2024 20:36

ReverseFerrets · 14/03/2024 19:21

You know what. Shit or get off the pot. Give us all the actual evidence. Not a bit of gossip from 8-6 years ago that went nowhere other than tabloid rumours. Tabloids don't get scared off by lawyers if they have truth on their side. Produce something more than some rubbish women pitted against women article from 2016. The tabloids had been going after Catherine for ages for being boring and frumpy, they ramped that up when the more glamorous and accomplished Meghan came along. They did it with Diana and Fergie. Pre Meghan, they didn't have anyone to compare Catherine with, so they found a pretty woman with an interesting past in their friendship circle. Produce something more than the blobby picture of an unidentified female's back in a nightclub, where William "kissing" her, that is about as clear as shit smeared on a windscreen. Produce something more than the odious shit bag that is Dan Wooten, the odious shit bag that is Giles Coren and the utter fantasist that is Nicole Cliffe.

Go on. In the meantime, you are using a woman's illness, her request for privacy, her unwillingness to bed the will of those demanding access to her and a mistake over a photograph as the conduit to go after her husband. Which is misogyny at its lowest.

A billion times this 👏 👏 👏 👏

WaitingForMojo · 14/03/2024 20:36

I can see the confusion here.

I read ‘not today’ as ‘oh for God’s sake, give it a rest’.

Whereas from the second post, I think the poster meant ‘there have been no deletions today’.

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:38

WaitingForMojo · 14/03/2024 20:36

I can see the confusion here.

I read ‘not today’ as ‘oh for God’s sake, give it a rest’.

Whereas from the second post, I think the poster meant ‘there have been no deletions today’.

I might have also meant kindly leave me in peace. But I sure didn’t tell anyone to stop posting here.

crockofshite · 14/03/2024 20:43

Merrymouse · 14/03/2024 16:46

I’m pretty sure both his parents are Jewish.

However I don’t think he is practicing.

I would guess that he is Jewish in the same way that David Baddiel is Jewish - not religious, but that wouldn’t have saved him from the Nazis.

Edited

I was wrong, sorry. I thought his mother wasn't Jewish but now I understand she is. My mistake.

crockofshite · 14/03/2024 20:45

LiterallyOnFire · 14/03/2024 16:58

In all honesty I don't know the backstory to that. But he was rejoicing over the death of a journalist on Twitter a couple of years ago. He's been embroiled in various low level bits of nonsense and controversy. Why anyone would need to go all orthodox Beth Din in an attempt to "discredit him" I can't imagine.

My mistake, I incorrectly thought his mother wasn't Jewish.

AliceOlive · 14/03/2024 20:46

MrsFinkelstein · 14/03/2024 20:36

A billion times this 👏 👏 👏 👏

Brilliant.

Swipe left for the next trending thread