Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry wants to come back and ‘help’

1000 replies

Gottseidank · 16/02/2024 22:55

Harry “is willing to return to a temporary royal role in support of his father during his illness, sources have revealed. In an attempt to help heal the rift in the family, the King and Prince Harry are said to have had several “warm ­exchanges” since Charles ­received his cancer diagnosis.
The duke is now understood to have told friends that he would step into a royal role while his father is unwell.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-harry-return-royal-role-king-charles-cancer-dn8tcm8nd

Revealed: Prince Harry ‘seeks royal return to heal rift with King Charles’

Duke said to have had warm exchanges with King after his father’s cancer diagnosis

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-harry-return-royal-role-king-charles-cancer-dn8tcm8nd

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 19:18

Absolutely. I reckon more people would turn out to see a sportsperson or an actor

As if more people would turn up to see Tom Daly cut a ribbon compared to the King and William or Catherine!, it’s not just the people concerned it’s what they represent and the cache they bring to events, in the case of royalty they are representing hundreds of years of tradition and ceremony which is ingrained in British life whether you like it or not, would Tom Cruise attend an air ambulance fund raiser if Greg Rutherford was patron? Not likely.

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:24

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:07

Land and estate they have inherited because of their royal status and money that they have had from the sovereign grant £86.3m. They want a private life no one can sell stories about them they must remain a mystery while they take money from the people. What is wrong with us it's only a book and an interview with Opera?

There has been many scandals that have come out of the royal family and Andrew being one of them. Harry struck while the iron was hot.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/apr/05/revealed-royals-took-more-than-1bn-income-from-controversial-estates-king-charles-queen-duchies-cornwall-lancaster

https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-57559653

Don't delude yourself into thinking Harry opposes hereditary titles and their privileges - he has retained and made it clear that he's intent on retaining his title and ensuring the next generation inherits theirs.
He comes across as simply a spoilt, self-involved and self-pitying individual who wanted greater control and status within that heirarchy, rather than advocating for the common person or seeking to abolish it. He then lashed out for literally years when he didn't get his own way.

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:31

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:24

Don't delude yourself into thinking Harry opposes hereditary titles and their privileges - he has retained and made it clear that he's intent on retaining his title and ensuring the next generation inherits theirs.
He comes across as simply a spoilt, self-involved and self-pitying individual who wanted greater control and status within that heirarchy, rather than advocating for the common person or seeking to abolish it. He then lashed out for literally years when he didn't get his own way.

"Buckingham Palace previously announced that Prince Harry and Meghan would no longer use their His/Her Royal Highness titles after they stepped back from their roles as working members of the royal family in 2020. Though they could still be referred to formally as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex."

Harry hasn't turned his back on his family he is only doing his thing and he is entitled to do it.

https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-tell-critics-they-will-not-be-broken-8584077#:~:text=Buckingham%20Palace%20previously%20announced%20that,Duke%20and%20Duchess%20of%20Sussex.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Hit Back at Recent Criticism: 'This Couple Will Not Be Broken'

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's representative issued a statement saying that the couple "will not be broken" after recent criticism that they are trying to reclaim their royal status through their new website, which features their "Sussex" titles

https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-tell-critics-they-will-not-be-broken-8584077#:~:text=Buckingham%20Palace%20previously%20announced%20that,Duke%20and%20Duchess%20of%20Sussex.

Teentaxidriver · 17/02/2024 19:36

Brave???!? @Runnerinthenight

You have a strange concept of brave. He has attacked individuals in public, at length, for money, knowing that they lack the ability in any meaningful way to reply. I think that is the behaviour of a bully and a coward. The idea that the British public would now be expected to turn out, cheer, waves flags, clap and show their support for him is revolting. And if that is what KC chooses then, frankly, fuck him too.

Runnerinthenight · 17/02/2024 19:38

Teentaxidriver · Today 19:36

Brave???!? @Runnerinthenight

You have a strange concept of brave. He has attacked individuals in public, at length, for money, knowing that they lack the ability in any meaningful way to reply. I think that is the behaviour of a bully and a coward. The idea that the British public would now be expected to turn out, cheer, waves flags, clap and show their support for him is revolting. And if that is what KC chooses then, frankly, fuck him too.

I think you tagged the wrong poster! I agree with you 100%!

Teentaxidriver · 17/02/2024 19:40

Sorry Runner!! Am getting a bit worked up about PH returning to rescue the RF, or however they spun it 😆

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:44

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:31

"Buckingham Palace previously announced that Prince Harry and Meghan would no longer use their His/Her Royal Highness titles after they stepped back from their roles as working members of the royal family in 2020. Though they could still be referred to formally as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex."

Harry hasn't turned his back on his family he is only doing his thing and he is entitled to do it.

https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-tell-critics-they-will-not-be-broken-8584077#:~:text=Buckingham%20Palace%20previously%20announced%20that,Duke%20and%20Duchess%20of%20Sussex.

So you have the energy to save articles on these two for future reference, just not actually read them?

They continue to refer to themselves using the titles "Duke" and "Duchess". As stated there.

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:46

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:44

So you have the energy to save articles on these two for future reference, just not actually read them?

They continue to refer to themselves using the titles "Duke" and "Duchess". As stated there.

Yes you are correct because they can use those titles it was given to them so it's theirs to use.

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:51

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:46

Yes you are correct because they can use those titles it was given to them so it's theirs to use.

My point being (I can't remember if it was you that I was responding to) that they're in no way against hereditary titles or privileges.

ArcaneWireless · 17/02/2024 19:51

The timing of it just strikes me as distasteful.

I have no doubt that H&M would have some support if they came back. What with his big giving heart and all…

The thing is, his big giving mouth has done a huge amount of damage and will have damaged the trust of not only his family, but those who formerly supported him.

I do understand that his father’s health will have troubled him and both will regret the events causing the current situation. Relationships can be repaired but trust cannot. Not really.

Life would be awkward and uneasy with H (or H&M) in the RF vicinity.

I think it is time for H to step back and make the best of the life he chose.

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:51

They are using their titles that was given to them and earning their own money. They are not taking from the public purse so there's the difference. Many celebs who have been given the right by the royal family to use the name dame or Sir for their public services to entertain or win medals etc. They use that title sir or dame but they don't take from the public purse.

Lea3 · 17/02/2024 19:59

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 19:51

They are using their titles that was given to them and earning their own money. They are not taking from the public purse so there's the difference. Many celebs who have been given the right by the royal family to use the name dame or Sir for their public services to entertain or win medals etc. They use that title sir or dame but they don't take from the public purse.

Edited

Correct, and this highlights their lack of opposition to hereditary privilege or titles.

Celebrities given knighthoods differ slightly: they typically achieve prominence through hard work and talent before being offered such honors. For instance, Paul McCartney, for example, earned his knighthood based on his own hard work and talent - not who his father or mother was. In contrast, Harry would never have been a duke if not for accident of birth.

Runnerinthenight · 17/02/2024 20:00

Carpediemmakeitcount · Today 19:51

They are using their titles that was given to them and earning their own money. They are not taking from the public purse so there's the difference. Many celebs who have been given the right by the royal family to use the name dame or Sir for their public services to entertain or win medals etc. They use that title sir or same but they don't take from the public purse.

Nothing remotely similar to people who have been awarded a title for an achievement. Harry and Meghan have their titles because of his family history. They were specifically told not to monetise those titles, which are a privilege in fact and not a right!

Coronateachingagain · 17/02/2024 20:08

BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 19:18

Absolutely. I reckon more people would turn out to see a sportsperson or an actor

As if more people would turn up to see Tom Daly cut a ribbon compared to the King and William or Catherine!, it’s not just the people concerned it’s what they represent and the cache they bring to events, in the case of royalty they are representing hundreds of years of tradition and ceremony which is ingrained in British life whether you like it or not, would Tom Cruise attend an air ambulance fund raiser if Greg Rutherford was patron? Not likely.

That is a good idea.

We can have all the new Sirs, Dames, OBEs and the rest to turn up to cut ribbons as part of the title deal. They would be still deemed to represent the Crown/Government. We don't need the son/brother/SIL/uncle of the King to do this. Enough of it
After all, what's the Duke of something got to do with the Wimbledon championships for example?

Carpediemmakeitcount · 17/02/2024 20:08

Runnerinthenight · 17/02/2024 20:00

Carpediemmakeitcount · Today 19:51

They are using their titles that was given to them and earning their own money. They are not taking from the public purse so there's the difference. Many celebs who have been given the right by the royal family to use the name dame or Sir for their public services to entertain or win medals etc. They use that title sir or same but they don't take from the public purse.

Nothing remotely similar to people who have been awarded a title for an achievement. Harry and Meghan have their titles because of his family history. They were specifically told not to monetise those titles, which are a privilege in fact and not a right!

They can't use HRH title because they are no longer working royals but they can use Duke and Duchess.

StartupRepair · 17/02/2024 20:10

How could he return when he not just trashed the family but the institution and individuals who work in it? Spare was viciously rude about people who worked for the queen and Charles. Harry expressed his outrage about the whole system, in particular the way PR works, ie relationships built with the press, particular stories timed and pushed over others. None of that has changed.
I still laugh remembering the Netflix's X trailer with Harry darkly muttering 'There. Is. A . Hierarchy '.
No shit.

Runnerinthenight · 17/02/2024 20:10

Coronateachingagain · Today 20:08

After all, what's the Duke of something got to do with the Wimbledon championships for example?

The Duke of Kent had a very long association with the all-England club. The Princess of Wales is now the patron. She has an interest in tennis and plays.

tutttutt · 17/02/2024 20:14

GlorianaCervixia · 16/02/2024 23:08

I can’t imagine that happening but it does sound like Harry is testing the waters for a permanent return.

If true, it means their goal of monetising their brand in America must be going much worse than anyone knows.

I very much doubt this. If anything he may see it as a way to prove their original request to be part time royals was the best all along

BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 20:16

Coronateachingagain · 17/02/2024 20:08

That is a good idea.

We can have all the new Sirs, Dames, OBEs and the rest to turn up to cut ribbons as part of the title deal. They would be still deemed to represent the Crown/Government. We don't need the son/brother/SIL/uncle of the King to do this. Enough of it
After all, what's the Duke of something got to do with the Wimbledon championships for example?

Maybe just maybe all the Sirs and the Dames will be doing their actual jobs which gave them the honours in the first place? how about the royals continue to do what the government instruct and pay them to do, represent the country.

Prydddan · 17/02/2024 20:17

@ArcaneWireless

And also damaged the trust of those who (if he came back to "help out") might be asked to interact with him as the King's representative. Diplomats and politicans at e.g. state dinners should be able to assume that their conversations and behavior won't be replayed for lols in Spare II.

CathyorClaire · 17/02/2024 20:17

FuzzyManul · 17/02/2024 11:06

His name is Henry, not Harold.

And yet he's never seen to use it.

Unlike 'Harold' and this week's reversion to 'Sir' which seems all the more surprising after the man of the people 'Just Call Me Harry' posturing at the beginning of this circus.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 20:20

If we are to have senior royals represent the government and country at home and abroad whilst flogging their ‘brand’ to the highest bidder for sponsorship deals then I will be at the front of the queue signing the petition for a republic.

ArcaneWireless · 17/02/2024 20:28

Prydddan

I never thought of that but you are of course right.

I wonder if H ever really considered the full implications of his actions.

I suspect not.

IwishIcouldfinishabook · 17/02/2024 20:29

BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 19:18

Absolutely. I reckon more people would turn out to see a sportsperson or an actor

As if more people would turn up to see Tom Daly cut a ribbon compared to the King and William or Catherine!, it’s not just the people concerned it’s what they represent and the cache they bring to events, in the case of royalty they are representing hundreds of years of tradition and ceremony which is ingrained in British life whether you like it or not, would Tom Cruise attend an air ambulance fund raiser if Greg Rutherford was patron? Not likely.

Fine the main ones- monarch and heir and spouses. Get them to actually do more than go to parties. By all means have them if we need a RF so badly. What about the rest of them? I think people would come to see Greg Rutherford over Prince Ecwards, kid. Cut them loose. Including Williams younger kids. This crap about how they need to draft in some random cousins because they are all sooo overworked is nonsense.

Coronateachingagain · 17/02/2024 20:30

BigWillyLittleTodger · 17/02/2024 20:20

If we are to have senior royals represent the government and country at home and abroad whilst flogging their ‘brand’ to the highest bidder for sponsorship deals then I will be at the front of the queue signing the petition for a republic.

I'll join you too if this happens.

Also yes, all these Sirs Dames would make better use of their time if they continued to do their jobs. Was just an idea. Let's keep brainstorming how to change the status quo ha

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.