Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Social media leaking news of POW hysterectomy

691 replies

CupOfCoffeeandaPineappleChunk · 20/01/2024 05:52

It goes without saying its only her business, however I found it odd that whilst 'doomscrolling' from sleeplessness I came across a couple of posts from US news sites claiming they had news obtained from 'Palace sources' posted onto SM.

We all know that KP is somewhat leaky but over something like this? (I suppose Maybe if the price was right?)
Or is it just speculation passed off as the truth?
Or, are US news sources avowed to publish info that uk ones aren't?

I'm not particularly interested in what she's had done, surgery is unpleasant, full stop, But I'm just wondering if there's a reason the story is in US but not uk news-if it even real ( which seems slightly unlikely I would think, but then you never know about anyone personal life).
Just found out odd and curious as to the whys

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 09:01

WinnieTheW0rm · 25/01/2024 07:01

What's this "latest release"?

It's not a release. It's something 'a source close to the Princess' told People magazine. In other words it could be any randomer with the loosest connection to the Princess of Wales, who knows absolutely nothing about her condition.

But this is how rumour and gossip spreads across the internet.

Hildebrandthehog · 25/01/2024 09:36

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 08:47

The problem with some people though is that whatever information is released they will put a negative spin on it. 'Oh the Princess is recovering as expected. That doesn't sound very good. Why haven't they said she's recovering well'. 'Oh dear, the Princess is expected to remain in hospital for another few days. She must be seriously seriously ill" and so on and so on. There are some awful drama llamas on here who can't take any statement at face value, but are desperate to find something sinister in everything.

Yes I agree with that on the whole. But I think there’s a balance to be struck. They could rule out a lot more to reduce the speculation.

Hildebrandthehog · 25/01/2024 09:40

WinnieTheW0rm · 25/01/2024 08:46

To think that any tabloids are going to offer KM privacy is naive. The BP PR machine needs to manage the situation better which is what they are paid to do*

I think they've done fine. No intrusion, other than one pic of Prince William in a car on the way to visit.

No leaks of her personal medical information that I've spotted.

Really? I don’t read them but people were joking at work about all the doom-mongering articles about “how will the country survive with two of them in hospital?” The coverage sounded ridiculously over the top.

Emotionalsupportviper · 25/01/2024 10:52

RaccoonOnTheSofa · 25/01/2024 08:13

To a point. The people on here saying they know it’s bulimia or she’s definitely got this mental health issue and so on are just vile. The problem with such posts is some idiot comes on here and says ‘Oh I KNOW it’s bulimia’ and someone else reads it and posts elsewhere and then it gets traction and before you know it, Twitter are all declaring she’s bulimic. There are a lot of lies that go round and it only takes one person for those lies to become truth to many people, such is the nature of the social media beast. So whilst discussing her health is one thing, the random speculation being purported as fact is dangerous. This idea that the actual celebrity isn’t reading here is a little irrelevant, because it only takes a few clicks and a rumour that could have a huge impact on someone’s life can get traction and take off. You may think it’s only a little board in the ether, but unfortunately this is how Chinese whispers start. So it IS important to be mindful and respectful.

I stand (partly) corrected.

You're right - speculation masquerading as fact is unacceptable, but I'd still ignore rather than get posts deleted (unless they were genuinely damaging to the individual concerned).

However there are a lot of (for want of a better term) virtue-signalling tw&ts whose only purpose seems to be stopping people who have opinions different from their own, from posting.

WinnieTheW0rm · 25/01/2024 10:54

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 09:01

It's not a release. It's something 'a source close to the Princess' told People magazine. In other words it could be any randomer with the loosest connection to the Princess of Wales, who knows absolutely nothing about her condition.

But this is how rumour and gossip spreads across the internet.

Thank you!

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 13:36

Emotionalsupportviper · 25/01/2024 10:52

I stand (partly) corrected.

You're right - speculation masquerading as fact is unacceptable, but I'd still ignore rather than get posts deleted (unless they were genuinely damaging to the individual concerned).

However there are a lot of (for want of a better term) virtue-signalling tw&ts whose only purpose seems to be stopping people who have opinions different from their own, from posting.

Oh behave! The fact that some of us find the doom mongering on here ridiculous is not virtue signalling. Is no one allowed voice an opinion on it?

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 16:22

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 05:28

The latest release, but no actual statement, says the royal family were ‘surprised’ by the situation, so that doesn’t sound very planned.

And ‘she will bounce back’ note the tense. It all sounds very much like they don’t know at this stage, and can’t confirm either way should it not go the way they hope.

I might remind the thread police that it is not ‘ghoulish’ to express concern on the forum. Don’t come on here if you don’t want to talk about it or read about it. I loathe the pious silencing posts, please go elsewhere. This is exactly the point of the thread to share our thoughts and concerns.

You really are adding up 2 and 2 and getting 10.

Some publications are saying that Kate's 'broader circle of friends' were surprised by the situation. Nowhere has it been stated that the royal family were surprised.

And, as already said, there has been no palace release saying 'Kate will bounce back.' That has been attributed to 'a source close to the Princess' ie a bored journalist rehashing the original statement and trying to make it sound a bit different.

Femitattler · 25/01/2024 18:44

Is Kate under pressure to reveal her operation?

Social media leaking news of POW hysterectomy
Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 19:08

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 16:22

You really are adding up 2 and 2 and getting 10.

Some publications are saying that Kate's 'broader circle of friends' were surprised by the situation. Nowhere has it been stated that the royal family were surprised.

And, as already said, there has been no palace release saying 'Kate will bounce back.' That has been attributed to 'a source close to the Princess' ie a bored journalist rehashing the original statement and trying to make it sound a bit different.

How do you know? I have posted the link, people can make up their own minds.

You are not the RF spokesperson.

whiteshutters · 25/01/2024 19:51

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 19:07

The headline says something that is not in the article.

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 20:30

whiteshutters · 25/01/2024 19:51

The headline says something that is not in the article.

It’s absolutely in the article have you bothered to read it?

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 20:37

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 19:08

How do you know? I have posted the link, people can make up their own minds.

You are not the RF spokesperson.

I am merely pointing out, as you seem so worried about Kate, that these 'releases' are simply rehashes of the original statement headlined to look as if there is new information, when the substance of the text makes it clear that any new additions are simply unsubstantiated stuff attributed vaguely to 'sources close to Kate', 'Kate's wider circle of friends'. You seemed quite happy earlier on to post your own doom laden interpretation, but don't like anyone else posting their less dramatic view.

whiteshutters · 25/01/2024 20:45

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 20:30

It’s absolutely in the article have you bothered to read it?

No - I decided not to and just made a wild guess 😫

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 21:06

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 20:37

I am merely pointing out, as you seem so worried about Kate, that these 'releases' are simply rehashes of the original statement headlined to look as if there is new information, when the substance of the text makes it clear that any new additions are simply unsubstantiated stuff attributed vaguely to 'sources close to Kate', 'Kate's wider circle of friends'. You seemed quite happy earlier on to post your own doom laden interpretation, but don't like anyone else posting their less dramatic view.

It says wider circle of FAMILY and friends. Read the article.

Belinda5 · 25/01/2024 21:46

I have. When you actually read the substance of the article it modifies it down to 'broader circle of family friends'. Which could mean the man who delivers her parents' milk, or someone who was at school with Pippa 25 years ago. It's well know tabloid journalism technique.
Do you seriously think the Queen, or Princess Ann or Eugenie are going around making off the cuff remarks to rubbish magazines?

JudgeJ · 25/01/2024 22:49

CupOfCoffeeandaPineappleChunk · 20/01/2024 06:04

Ah, so much of the US press is national enquirer ( i think that's what the mad conspiracies and aliens one is called) style fantasy then?

Well you learn something new every day!

Reading the National Enquirer headlines at the checkout is one of my roadtrip delights!

whiteshutters · 25/01/2024 23:39

Newchapterbeckons · 25/01/2024 21:06

It says wider circle of FAMILY and friends. Read the article.

It does not say the Royal family did not know in the article.

User3563573 · 27/01/2024 17:45

Tomorrow will be day 11 after they made the announcement. Hoping she is well enough to go home already and curious whether they will announce when it happens, or wait a few days to throw people off the trail. She could already be home now and they'll announce on Monday. Quite obviously, the closer they get to Day 14 the more anxious the press will become. It's really, really quiet on that front...even the DM squeezed several articles out of Charles coming out of surgery and Camilla visiting him but no followup or any update regarding Kate. There must be a blanket agreement with the press going on.

MoneyMoneyMoneyy · 27/01/2024 18:40

It’s all very strange. Don’t think I’ve ever heard of a young Royal being in hospital for this long and it coming out of the blue

EdithWeston · 27/01/2024 18:48

User3563573 · 27/01/2024 17:45

Tomorrow will be day 11 after they made the announcement. Hoping she is well enough to go home already and curious whether they will announce when it happens, or wait a few days to throw people off the trail. She could already be home now and they'll announce on Monday. Quite obviously, the closer they get to Day 14 the more anxious the press will become. It's really, really quiet on that front...even the DM squeezed several articles out of Charles coming out of surgery and Camilla visiting him but no followup or any update regarding Kate. There must be a blanket agreement with the press going on.

I don't think they need a "blanket agreement"

They have made one statement, at the end of which they said they would only issue further statements when there was something significant to say. I heard that press are being moved on from outside the hospital, so no pix beyond one of William arriving once, and Camilla visiting Charles. And the hospital itself is proving leakproof. So there just isn't anything to report. (And there isn't a huge amount you can invent either)

I expect the next statement will be that she has left hospital and is convalescing at home.

Atethehalloweenchocs · 27/01/2024 19:21

In the UK the RF and the media have a relationship with each other, and I think the media know they have to manage this if they want any kind of access. So there is a line that they dont cross - whereas in the US there is no such relationship and therefore no censoring by the press. Also think it is highly likely that someone who is not overly hard working may not be pushing too hard to get back to work.

meercat23 · 27/01/2024 19:31

Also think it is highly likely that someone who is not overly hard working may not be pushing too hard to get back to work.

That is a foul thing to say. Do you not think she would want to get back home to her children.

Delphigirl · 27/01/2024 20:01

EdithWeston · 27/01/2024 18:48

I don't think they need a "blanket agreement"

They have made one statement, at the end of which they said they would only issue further statements when there was something significant to say. I heard that press are being moved on from outside the hospital, so no pix beyond one of William arriving once, and Camilla visiting Charles. And the hospital itself is proving leakproof. So there just isn't anything to report. (And there isn't a huge amount you can invent either)

I expect the next statement will be that she has left hospital and is convalescing at home.

I drove past the London clinic today and there were masses of press outside the hospital. They have also spotted the Queen going into visit the king three times today. Prince William has not been seen visiting her for a week because he hasn’t visited her for a week. Whether that is because he isn’t interested, she doesn’t want him to, she isn’t fit to be visited or she isn’t there, it is impossible to know. But don’t believe the nonsense you are being fed by the famously misleading tabloid press.

Delphigirl · 27/01/2024 20:04

meercat23 · 27/01/2024 19:31

Also think it is highly likely that someone who is not overly hard working may not be pushing too hard to get back to work.

That is a foul thing to say. Do you not think she would want to get back home to her children.

Interesting that her children haven’t been brought to see her. Again whether that is because she isn’t fit to be visited or not there who can say. It cannot be because they don’t want to see her or she doesn’t want to see them, however, we can probably agree on that.