Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

George's exams

918 replies

everetting · 02/10/2023 14:52

Kate is not going with william to Singapore as George has important exams. What exams would a 10 year old be sitting in November?
I know nothing about private school systems so hoping someone here does.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Roussette · 09/10/2023 12:28

I am asking what the point is of saying something like that, implying its possible?

Exactly. It's been said about four times now. It'll be fact by next week!

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:29

Howsimplywonderful · 09/10/2023 12:26

I doubt ex prime ministers children get protection unless the security services deem it necessary - much like Harry

Politicians children aren’t over exposed and exploited in the same way as royal children. It’s not comparable.

Roussette · 09/10/2023 12:30

Serenster · 09/10/2023 12:16

I imagine the security services are slightly more clued up about the nature of the threats facing current high profile people than you, Iwantcakeeveryday - but maybe if you feel strongly you could apply for a job there? 😀

Golly me

If I had posted something like that to you, you would've rebuked me for being sarky or rude.
I say far less and you pull me up on it
Yet it's ok for you to be sarky and patronising to others? 😮

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:30

I would be making sure my son and his family were safe whether they were a working royal or not

Iwantcakeeveryday · 09/10/2023 12:30

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:29

Politicians children aren’t over exposed and exploited in the same way as royal children. It’s not comparable.

Yes exactly, its silly to compare when quite clearly they are not forced into the same kind of role.

Roussette · 09/10/2023 12:31

Maybe Charles sends money . Maybe he doesn’t. We don’t know

5 times now! 😂

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:32

I can just see Charles going down to Ramsdens to use the western union

Roussette · 09/10/2023 12:32

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:22

Exactly my point!

Something needs to change. Either change it for the better (lifelong security) or stop using the children for PR, giving the press access to them (no matter how controlled the environment) - they are creating the exact same recipe for disaster as they did for William and Harry.

The institution and the press shouldn’t get to benefit from the children if the children don’t get something back in return, even if they eventually want to leave.

This ⬆️

Iwantcakeeveryday · 09/10/2023 12:34

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:30

I would be making sure my son and his family were safe whether they were a working royal or not

Yup same. The Queen did send her own car to get Harry from the airport didn't she? She also still did birthday wishes and stuff whereas since her death there are none. I think she tried to still be a family even if he wasn't in the firm, but Charles and William are not like her are they.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:35

Serenster · 09/10/2023 12:16

I imagine the security services are slightly more clued up about the nature of the threats facing current high profile people than you, Iwantcakeeveryday - but maybe if you feel strongly you could apply for a job there? 😀

We’re having an interesting, civilised discussion- I think the sarcasm was uncalled for.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:36

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:30

I would be making sure my son and his family were safe whether they were a working royal or not

Agree

Iwantcakeeveryday · 09/10/2023 12:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:38

Roussette · 09/10/2023 12:32

This ⬆️

Yes, I think this is the crux of the matter including why this thread was started in the first place. It all comes down to this.

Angrycat2768 · 09/10/2023 12:39

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:30

I would be making sure my son and his family were safe whether they were a working royal or not

People associated with far right groups have been prosecuted for issuing death threats against Harry and Meghan. Added to that the conspiracy theorists claiming the children are not theirs ( many of whom are also far Right) and the hostility whipped up by the Britsh tabloids against them. I'd want security too.

Daisyislazy · 09/10/2023 12:43

Neither could I stand to have grandchildren that I didn't know and if this was totally out of my control I would still make sure those children were safe and protected

Serenster · 09/10/2023 12:54

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 12:35

We’re having an interesting, civilised discussion- I think the sarcasm was uncalled for.

Point taken, but in that case I will politely ask Iwantcakeeveryday to explain why they believe that they have enough knowledge of what is extremely secret information about the threat level directed at anyone in the UK to support her opinion? Unfounded speculation is hardly persuasive.

Holly Willoughby is a good case in point. I don’t believe that there was anyone here who would have thought she might be facing an imminent threat - but she was, and the authorities clearly knew about it. And acted. They have access to so much more information that we simply know nothing about.

Diana still had a very high profile public role in the UK following her separation from Charles - a quite different situation to Harry and Meghan following January 2020. She also was obviously the mother to the second and third in line, at that point in time. Two factors that I imagine had quite a bit to do with the assessment of the level of threat to her.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 13:01

Understood @Serenster

To be honest I think the finer details of security is besides the point.

They should be afforded lifelong security for services to the crown/institution since birth.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 13:02

This.

Something needs to change. Either change it for the better (lifelong security) or stop using the children for PR, giving the press access to them (no matter how controlled the environment) - they are creating the exact same recipe for disaster as they did for William and Harry.

The institution and the press shouldn’t get to benefit from the children if the children don’t get something back in return, even if they eventually want to leave.

Iwantcakeeveryday · 09/10/2023 13:08

Unfounded speculation is hardly persuasive.

and yet this entire board constantly speculates about the royals, their relationships and all kinds of things, and that includes you. So go leave your snarky comments to everyone else speculating on the board.

MissElinorDashwood · 09/10/2023 13:10

I saw the cover of Hello magazine this morning and it bothered me.
It’s why I found myself back on this thread today.

everetting · 09/10/2023 13:42

Iwantcakeeveryday · 09/10/2023 12:34

Yup same. The Queen did send her own car to get Harry from the airport didn't she? She also still did birthday wishes and stuff whereas since her death there are none. I think she tried to still be a family even if he wasn't in the firm, but Charles and William are not like her are they.

I think the Queen was more forgiving. After all she never publicly retaliated over Charles public trashing of his mother's mothering.

OP posts:
everetting · 09/10/2023 13:43

Howsimplywonderful · 09/10/2023 12:25

@MissElinorDashwood

Ex Presidents adult children don’t get protection.

Apart from Chelsea, I wouldn't know who any of them are.

OP posts:
Howsimplywonderful · 09/10/2023 13:49

@everetting

I would recognise Trumps, Obamas and the Bush’s children. I’m surprised you wouldn’t

Ditto I don’t think that the ex
prime minister Blair’s kids get protection, unless there is a specific threat

themessygarden · 09/10/2023 13:51

everetting · 09/10/2023 13:43

Apart from Chelsea, I wouldn't know who any of them are.

I think you may have blocked out the Trump era Everetting.😀Don't blame you if you have

I would also know of the Obama offspring.

derxa · 09/10/2023 13:54

Howsimplywonderful · 09/10/2023 13:49

@everetting

I would recognise Trumps, Obamas and the Bush’s children. I’m surprised you wouldn’t

Ditto I don’t think that the ex
prime minister Blair’s kids get protection, unless there is a specific threat

Agree