@Mycatisthebestever
The one above smacks more of the gutter press that you so often decry. If I remember correctly you are not British and I would say that is possibly a reason why you don't "get it". If we are to talk about military action and war then the Queen's family were held dear to the hearts of the British during WW2 and since. Whilst these things may be ceremonial there is much more to it than that. It isn't something that bears cold critical analysis but more of literally "being British" and having a heritage.
I have read many jaw dropping things on these threads but this one stopped me in my tracks.
No, I am not British. But I am from a former British colony that knows far better than we should about the consequences of British troops on our nations, troops that slaughtered our people as they fought in the name of King and country.
Sure, go back to WWII if you want to emphasise the specialness of the Royal Family links to the military, as long as you are happy for me to go back to that time too, when my grandfather's brother fought in Burma in the Second World War, with the King's African Rifles, and had friends who did not come back alive in a war that had nothing to do with Africa.
Permit me too, to go through every single war of aggression against the native population fought by the British army in my continent. South Africa. Ghana. Nigeria. Kenya. Zimbabwe. Do you want me to go on?
So please, don't "you are not British so don't get it" me.
As for this:
It isn't something that bears cold critical analysis but more of literally "being British" and having a heritage.
So because I am not British, I don't have a heritage?
I have a heritage. One that the British tried to destroy. And one that is not tied up with plunder, looting and death.
Me aside, your post is an insult to every person who does not tie their identity to the Royal Family, but still consider themselves British.