No such thing as a woman with a black mother, being a 'white savour'.
Okay, charity work in Africa for pr purposes. Is that better? You can't tell me that the photo in the link wasn't a deliberate attempt to copy Diana when even the placement of Meghan’s sunglasses are in exactly the same place as Diana’s.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.indiatoday.in/amp/lifestyle/celebrity/story/meghan-markle-copies-princess-diana-s-style-in-photoshoot-disturbing-says-internet-1638556-2020-01-20
The bananas were part of the package and she just instinctively wanted to write a persona message to the women. According to the head of the charity, everyone was happy with this.
Of course the head of the charity would say that. Meghan was a working royal, they couldn't come out and say that some of the women may have felt insulted by those messages. And regardless, even if Meghan did that on instinct, to write those quotes on bananas to sex workers just makes it seem so patronizing. I can only imagine what the outcome would have been if Catherine did something like that. And I would criticize her as well if she ever did do something like that.
I think that's one of the main differences between Meghan and Diana. Diana came across as authentic and someone who knew how to treat people with dignity and humanity without ever coming across as patronizing them.
A word salad to you cause your not listening, and your mind is clouded with negativity against her. Or maybe you are too thick to understand.
Of course you're now going with the insults. Typical. Yes sure, I'm oh so thick to understand Meghan’s statements. the below statements from Meghan truly are profound and meaningful and not at all cringy word salads:
One of the first things my husband saw when we walked around the house was those two palm trees. See how they’re connected at the bottom? He goes, 'My love, it’s us.' And now every day when Archie goes by us, he says, 'Hi, Momma. Hi, Papa.'"
I was sitting in Nottingham cottage and The Little Mermaid came on," Meghan recalled. "And who as an adult really watches The Little Mermaid but it came on and I was like, 'Well I'm here all the time I might as well watch this,' and I went, 'Oh my God she falls in love with the prince and because of that she loses her voice.' "
The soon-to-be mother of two added, "But in the end she gets her voice back."
As for merching. The queen merched gin/tea and all sorts. Charles just released a perfume. Plus he has a whole duchy line at Waitrose for daily marching, wtf?
For one thing, the queen is the head of the monarchy so she gets to have a say with how the royal family brand is used in commercial products. Same thing with Charles since he is now the king. There's certain rules the palace follows in order to sell the products under the royal brand name, and my understanding is that Meghan was not following these rules and was treating it more like a typical Hollywood branding opportunity. Again, that shows how badly she fit because she was not willing to follow the rules and the hierarchy set in place. Just because the queen or king may be able to do certain things as head of the monarchy doesn't mean that Meghan or the other royals get to do the same. Yes it may be unfair but that's part of being in the royal family. Meghan chose to join it, no one forced her to do so.
I noticed you also didn't address my comment that Meghan seems to also have no problem marrying, befriending and interacting with people who have been accused of racism.