Sussex's snubbed on both sides of the Atlantic

[susan12345678]

Harry and Meghan will be invited to the coronation - by necessity - but this toxic pair will be kept at a careful arm's length by all and sundry, excluded from the balcony or carriage procession, and probably positioned somewhere suitably inconspicuous. Most of the family will be wary of them, most will wherever possible avoid them and the crowds will likely boo them. There will be no lucrative photo ops with William or Kate. The Wales children will be in the limelight, but Harry and Meghan's children will be excluded, due to age.

Meanwhile, over in the States, where they no doubt expected to be feted when they planned their dramatic departure from the UK, opinion polls reveal them to be less popular now than even Prince Andrew. South Park mocked them to general acclaim and The Cut published a contemptuous piece about the possible relaunch of the Tig last week.

They've been snubbed and excluded from every big social event, from the Met Gala to Obama's birthday party and Elton John's Oscar's bash. The only parties they have attended have been those hosted by social pariahs like Ellen de Generes.

They are coming across as increasingly desperate and embarrassing. It's hard to to see any possible comeback from here.

Starstruck obsessives don't have that power.

Go build a Springtime altar for your saints. Go prepare.

you sound DE-RANGED - oh yes...you are.

I would rather be starstruck than full of bile and hate ....keep on.

So KIND, who inspired you again? 😂

Love it !
It wasn't meant to be kind. It was a response to your post.

Like Pp You want to be nasty but expect others to ignore or be kind to you. And then desperately use M&H one liner to try and back your point..

A tad embarrassing

Sorry - I can see I must be being dim.

I just couldn't work out if you were saying skullbabe was obsessed because she'd bothered to work out the stats, or that the posters who'd posted very frequently were obsessed, as opposed to the "we" you referenced.

Pathetic from the heritage foundation but Harry put himself in that position. Meh.

It's not desperate it's easy peasy.
Celebots don't take effort. they don't have complex opinions. I'm sorry you don't see yourself. Anyway, don't use me to reverse out Blip's findings.
Obsessives need to know we see them.

But surely one of the objections (the main objection?) about the RF is that they are above the law. So if Harry has been treated as above the law, isn't that wrong as well, and need addressing?

"Just call me Harry" 😂

That was addressed to the idea that the Heritage Foundations FOIA request is 'pathetic'...

I think the US rules are about conviction regarding drug offences, technically nothing to declare if you haven't been.

This is me giving Unprepared the last word because she will stalk around after me for it if I don't. 🎯
Ta-da - over to you Prep 😂

And my children HRH Prince/ss...!

That was eye-roll inducing, not gonna lie.

It's not desperate it's easy peasy.
Celebots don't take effort. they don't have complex opinions. I'm sorry you don't see yourself. Anyway, don't use me to reverse out Blip's findings.
Obsessives need to know we see them.

Complex opinions. - is that where you see yourself on an M&H thread 😃? Were you the critical thinker I referred to? Oh now I understand your annoyance. I was thinking it was different username .......🤣🤣🤣🤣

A quick Google suggests otherwise...
'Persons who (1) have a conviction for, or who (2) admit to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of, a violation of any law or regulation of a state, the US or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance, are inadmissible'

https://www.chavinimmigration.com/us-visas-citizenship/visa-ineligibility/drug-use-and-admission-to-the-us

'A history of drug abuse or addiction will bar you from entering the U.S. on health grounds. Drug abuse is broadly defined to mean anything beyond mere experimenting. In general, experimenting is considered just one use. Anything beyond one non-medical use of a controlled substance will be considered drug abuse.'
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-health-issues-can-make-you-inadmissible-the-us.html

Of course, few people would 'admit' to drug use on a way that the US authorities would be able to act on, unless they have a conviction. But Harry has publicly admitted to regular drug use for a number of years.

Thanks @mixedrecycling

Of course, plenty of other rich and famous people with convictions for drug use get admitted to the US all the time (not just the US!)

But it is definitely one rule for them, and another for the rest of us.

Thanks for the info @mixedrecycling . Harry has admitted to regular drug use for a number of years yet he'd been in and out of the US many times in the last decade with no issues. Double standard!

There’s a waiver process you have to go through but you can’t apply for the waiver until you’ve been officially denied entry.

The biggest offense is lying about it.

But the drug use bar can be overcome.

Who knows, they may want to use Harry as an example, i'll be watching the response to the Heritage's request.

I picked up on the arrogance, dunno who your crazy mutterings are about, I don't think you do either so don't ask me.
Have you met notanotherone? Meeting of equal minds if you're lonely.

Just as getting a residency visa is straightforward if you are rich enough -

Here are the key prerequisites for you to be eligible for the eb-5 visa.

• To be eligible for the eb-5 visa, you must make an investment of $900,000 in the Targeted Employment Area (TEA), or $1.8 million outside TEA.
• Your investment must create at least 10 American full-time jobs for at least two years.
• Your investment money must have been earned legally.
• The investment must be approved by U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services.
• The enterprise that you are investing in must have been established after 1990 and must be a “for-profit” new commercial enterprise.
• The investment must be “at-risk”, which means there is no guarantee of the capital investment return.

https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/how-to-get-usa-investor-visa/

$900,000/1.8 million is £735,000/1.5 million

It's just 😁a matter of being rich enough.

Perhaps they took him in as a refugee? They were escaping and persecution imprisonment by his family who were all at war (or at least their offices were).

The discussion merits a separate thread really.