Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Should Harry attend the coronation?

267 replies

Price21210 · 16/03/2023 15:40

I say NO.

Why put himself through it? His family is too cold and not just because of his actions or what has revealed. I think they have always been that way.

Besides, it will also be Archie's birthday.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 09:59

But there's rarely any instances provided. Harry has his perspective, but unless he can provide specific instances it's all just jibber jabber. He thinks someone's using him as a scapegoat. He thinks it may be his father and/or brother, but he doesn't know that. It could be staff, or it could be the papers making stuff up. Which they do regularly. 'A source' often means Trevor on the sleb tittle tattle desk, or something they just dreamed up on a whim. It could be someone sitting next to someone at a restaurant 'Heard Harry's got himself into a scrape again' and it carries on from there.

Roussette · 17/03/2023 10:08

smilesy · 17/03/2023 08:58

You said it wasn’t mentioned at all. I never said it was the same number of posters. Stop moving the goalposts 😂. Posters mentioned it in relation to the procession out of the Queen’s vigil, saying PDA’s were inappropriate and unnecessary on a short walk out of a formal setting like that. And they mentioned the Tindalls as well. There have been other occasions when only the Sussexes were mentioned because they were the only ones present. I’m not saying that there were not posters who didn’t single out the Sussexes, I’m saying it’s not true that none mentioned the Tindalls.

I didn't say it wasn't mentioned at all. I said it was the sheer number of incensed posts about Harry and Meghan

Roussette · 17/03/2023 10:10

To qualify. From certain posters. Maybe it was mentioned, I didn't see it because it was drowned out with disgust with Harry and Meghan

Roussette · 17/03/2023 10:11

Samcro · 17/03/2023 09:46

have to say I am more interested in what part PA will take, will he be booed. what he did is much worse that PH.

Hear hear!

Nah, posters just want to shout and scream about Harry and Meghan, not the disgraced brother of the Monarch!

Lostmarblesfinder · 17/03/2023 10:22

Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 09:59

But there's rarely any instances provided. Harry has his perspective, but unless he can provide specific instances it's all just jibber jabber. He thinks someone's using him as a scapegoat. He thinks it may be his father and/or brother, but he doesn't know that. It could be staff, or it could be the papers making stuff up. Which they do regularly. 'A source' often means Trevor on the sleb tittle tattle desk, or something they just dreamed up on a whim. It could be someone sitting next to someone at a restaurant 'Heard Harry's got himself into a scrape again' and it carries on from there.

You don’t believe him that is absolutely fine with me but I do believe him. I saw enough of what went on with Diana when she was alive to know exactly what Harry is talking about and to me it is absolutely obvious it has happened to Meghan too. It is so normal in the palaces that they see nothing wrong with the behaviour but as I said I see it as scapegoating of Harry and his family.

ShonaShoop · 17/03/2023 10:31

If they are invited to the Kings Coronation I’m sure Harry and Meghan are able to decide, themselves, whether they want to attend or not.

Its nothing to do with anyone else

Inkanta · 17/03/2023 10:40

Lostmarblesfinder · 17/03/2023 10:22

You don’t believe him that is absolutely fine with me but I do believe him. I saw enough of what went on with Diana when she was alive to know exactly what Harry is talking about and to me it is absolutely obvious it has happened to Meghan too. It is so normal in the palaces that they see nothing wrong with the behaviour but as I said I see it as scapegoating of Harry and his family.

Yes me too. The behaviour is there to see. We scapegoat on here too to legitimise the whole system.

smilesy · 17/03/2023 10:43

Roussette · 17/03/2023 10:08

I didn't say it wasn't mentioned at all. I said it was the sheer number of incensed posts about Harry and Meghan

In your post at 08.16 you said it wasn’t mentioned at all That’s what I was disagreeing with. OK, you have since said that you didn’t personally see it which is a more accurate statement, so that’s sorted now then 👍

KeHuyWinner · 17/03/2023 10:49

Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 09:59

But there's rarely any instances provided. Harry has his perspective, but unless he can provide specific instances it's all just jibber jabber. He thinks someone's using him as a scapegoat. He thinks it may be his father and/or brother, but he doesn't know that. It could be staff, or it could be the papers making stuff up. Which they do regularly. 'A source' often means Trevor on the sleb tittle tattle desk, or something they just dreamed up on a whim. It could be someone sitting next to someone at a restaurant 'Heard Harry's got himself into a scrape again' and it carries on from there.

He paid for crappy therapy where he wasn't challenged in any way and has positioned himself and Meghan as victims and cannot move from that position as he now firmly believes it to be true.

So when many people don't respond to his self-pitying self-victimisation as one of the most privileged people in the world, he gets to cry 'victim' again.

AcornGreen · 17/03/2023 10:51

Yes he should. But I don’t think Liam, Louis,Nile or Zan should.

michaelmacrae · 17/03/2023 11:04

He paid for crappy therapy where he wasn't challenged in any way

Were you there in his therapy sessions?

Roussette · 17/03/2023 11:08

Lostmarblesfinder · 17/03/2023 10:22

You don’t believe him that is absolutely fine with me but I do believe him. I saw enough of what went on with Diana when she was alive to know exactly what Harry is talking about and to me it is absolutely obvious it has happened to Meghan too. It is so normal in the palaces that they see nothing wrong with the behaviour but as I said I see it as scapegoating of Harry and his family.

Absolutely. If anyone on these threads actually doesn't think the RF will do anything literally anything to protect the Institution, they need to research and read a bit more. It's happened time and time again.
Certain members of the RF used in stories to divert attention away from other stuff. Royal households pitted against each other and each briefing seperately. The symbiotic relationship between the press and the monarch... i.e. print something nice about me (or whoever) and I'll feed you this titbit.

It is all about media control. And I don't doubt for one minute Harry was used to feed this at times. How much, we will never know. But to deny it ever happened is bizarre.

The RF exercise unprecedented levels of control over their image but the media needs something juicy from time to time.

Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 11:18

'If anyone on these threads actually doesn't think the RF will do anything literally anything to protect the Institution, they need to research and read a bit more.'

Including burying stories about Harry's behaviour?

KeHuyWinner · 17/03/2023 11:21

michaelmacrae · 17/03/2023 11:04

He paid for crappy therapy where he wasn't challenged in any way

Were you there in his therapy sessions?

Nope. But I can see the results. One of the most privileged people in the world being so self-centred and narcissistic that he thinks he's one of life's victims. Using vague therapy speak and vague accusations against his family and more concrete accusations against media. That he claims to hate and accuses of violating his privacy while profiting hugely from making Netflix documentaries and best selling books, seeking sympathy from the public in the quest to 'tell his truth'.

I can't believe some people are falling for it to be honest. South Park was spot on.

Roussette · 17/03/2023 11:21

Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 11:18

'If anyone on these threads actually doesn't think the RF will do anything literally anything to protect the Institution, they need to research and read a bit more.'

Including burying stories about Harry's behaviour?

Including releasing them.

Plitvice · 17/03/2023 11:23

KeHuyWinner · 17/03/2023 11:21

Nope. But I can see the results. One of the most privileged people in the world being so self-centred and narcissistic that he thinks he's one of life's victims. Using vague therapy speak and vague accusations against his family and more concrete accusations against media. That he claims to hate and accuses of violating his privacy while profiting hugely from making Netflix documentaries and best selling books, seeking sympathy from the public in the quest to 'tell his truth'.

I can't believe some people are falling for it to be honest. South Park was spot on.

A new episode of South Park is already due!

BadgerB · 17/03/2023 11:23

notanotheroneagain · Yesterday 19:14
I think they should go to the coronation.
Since it's being repeated that H hates his family, I will also repeat that he does not. He hates the workers who are calling the shots and influencing his family. Get rid of the bigoted lot, not H and his family.
H&M did not cause any hurt, the courtiers and their media cronies did.

You're sure its not the fairies at the bottom of the garden? Or the evil British media?
Obviously the Royal Family should sack all their staff and let Harry & Meghan (well, maybe just Meghan) tell them how to run the monarchy, and how to muzzle the Press

Samcro · 17/03/2023 11:30

Roussette · 17/03/2023 10:11

Hear hear!

Nah, posters just want to shout and scream about Harry and Meghan, not the disgraced brother of the Monarch!

its weird. rich white guy has relations with a trafficked girl. yet its H&M that should be booed.

Coxspurplepippin · 17/03/2023 11:31

Roussette · 17/03/2023 11:21

Including releasing them.

So you don't think there are stories about questionable behaviour on Harry's part that the palace have buried. Or done deals with the press not to publish?

Fragrantandfoolish · 17/03/2023 11:33

I also think they thought they would be global superstars when they left and this drove much of their behaviour. They thought the palace was holding them back, putting them in a little box and they were the real stars of the show with huge potential

and to be fair to them, they did have this opportunity . They were not hugely wrong here. At that point they were hot property. What the queen spotted in their plans and disallowed was they couldn’t monetise their titles. But let’s face it they did it anyway.

they squandered their chance at superstardom, because of their distasteful, inelegant, often Petty, arguably dishonest at times and deeply hypocritical behaviour, they habe turned themselves into two of the most controversial, mocked and divisive people out there.

they have no career path to speak of. Literally nothing. Their sole career path is being royal and leveraging it and trading on it to get roles and money.

They do very little charity work themselves and make sure to tip off the paps so they are always photographed when they do do something, so everyone knows, they deride the monarchy repeatedly and take huge sums of money to do it , whilst desperately clinging on to being royal.

BadgerB · 17/03/2023 11:41

Fragrantandfoolish · Today 11:33
I also think they thought they would be global superstars when they left and this drove much of their behaviour. They thought the palace was holding them back, putting them in a little box and they were the real stars of the show with huge potential
and to be fair to them, they did have this opportunity . They were not hugely wrong here. At that point they were hot property. What the queen spotted in their plans and disallowed was they couldn’t monetise their titles. But let’s face it they did it anyway.
they squandered their chance at superstardom, because of their distasteful, inelegant, often Petty, arguably dishonest at times and deeply hypocritical behaviour, they habe turned themselves into two of the most controversial, mocked and divisive people out there.
they have no career path to speak of. Literally nothing. Their sole career path is being royal and leveraging it and trading on it to get roles and money.
They do very little charity work themselves and make sure to tip off the paps so they are always photographed when they do do something, so everyone knows, they deride the monarchy repeatedly and take huge sums of money to do it , whilst desperately clinging on to being royal.

Agree completely with this summery. Meghan, being American, maybe didn't see what a great opportunity they had for world-wide fame. Harry, being at the far end of "stupid", listened only to Meghan.

Blip · 17/03/2023 11:45

The RF is clearly as toxic to Harry as Harry is toxic to the RF.
Harry is very unpopular and unwelcome in the UK and increasingly in the US as well. He should live out his immensely privileged life with his wife and children outside of the UK.
Most of us are sick of him wingeing and moaning in public and of his grating hypocrisy.

KeHuyWinner · 17/03/2023 11:45

Plitvice · 17/03/2023 11:23

A new episode of South Park is already due!

Trey and Matt are incredible satirists still knocking it out of the park after 26 season's 😀.

They were totally spot on with H and M as they often are.

BillyAteMyChips · 17/03/2023 11:51

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SkyandSurf · 17/03/2023 11:58

He should.

The whole lot's only value is to provide entertainment for the masses. In exchange for this they get their lives of luxury subsidised by working taxpayers and everyone allowing them to be above us despite a complete lack of merit, talent or virtue.

It's basically a gladiator arena and would we not be entertained if Harry attended?

Swipe left for the next trending thread