Also how do you simultaneously claim your mother was wonderful and loving and your childhood was devoid of hugs and love?
Also I think this emphasis on hugs as the measure of a loving parent is warped and simplistic.
I can envision scenarios with unstable parents who shower children with hugs and proclamations of love but where this represents the parents needs and they are also generally focused on meeting their own needs, children are props to illustrate something about themselves, they are emotionally labile in all respects and the children have to study them carefully to judge their stability from moment to moment.
Also there could be a parent who is reserved with hugs and verbal proclamations but who devotes their time and efforts to meeting all the other needs such as attention, focus, self sacrifice, who never lets the child down who would always put the child above themself and who the child never questions their consistency and reliability.
Now neither are perfect both are imperfect in different ways but the purported notion that hugs equal better parenting is just untrue.
I think neither of Harry's parents focused on the needs of the children. Diana was probably more openly affectionate than Charles but I suspect she had other limitations as a parent.
I think what would really help Harry would be coming to an adult understanding of both his parents as flawed people and forgiving them.
He seems still to be stuck in splitting with his mum and Meghan as good and perfect and Charles and William as bad. This is representative of him not having integrated his dark side into his own personality and why the idea of psychedelics having now restored him to being 'good' not like his family who remain bad, is so seductive to him.