Where is Meghan?

[StarInTheHeavens]

I haven't seen hide-nor-hair of Meghan since the book release which is uncharacteristic of her. Even with the Montecito floods there was no news. So I'm wondering how this is playing out? Happiness or anger behind closed doors?

Is this Ashley Cole richer than Harry? A lot richer? To make up for having no title

I think the polls are weird and stupid. Why are they comparing Andrew to H&M? He was a boring guy who no one thought about for decades until the Epstein friendship came to light. Now he is, at worst a man that took advantage of trafficked teens. At best he’s a pedophile apologist with a rarely seen level of clueless arrogance. Awful.

Harry and Meghan are, in some opinions, whiny and annoying, have treated their families shabbily.

I’d choose to hang out with them over Andrew any day of the week.

I wouldn't hang out with either of them. Andrew would look down his nose as though I was a nasty smell, and I have nothing to offer whinge and ginge that could benefit them (apart from my intelligence).

I think the polls are weird and stupid. Why are they comparing Andrew to H&M?

American commentators discussing PA being more popular than H and M that I've seen seem to think it because most polled had no idea who PA actually was in the US while they did know H &M and didn't at that moment like much.

There's supposed to be no such thing as bad publicity - so I guess they get to test that out going forward.

Well it’s just as well Harry likes them older and unnatural 🤣 (I mean, really?)

Regardless - she’s now worth more than if she had married Ashley Cole so if it was just about money she made the better choice.

maybe as he is easy on the eye a ons lol

@skullbabe Try to stop taking random sentences out of context, jumble them up like pick and mix, and then try to present it as a rational statement. Even I have literally, no idea what you are talking about

@Lizziet64 Yes, the couple are a walking PR disaster, and have destroyed the most important thing a 'brand' needs, trustworthiness. The amount of lying, misdirection, misinformation etc is staggering.

@GloomyDarkness The problem for H&M is that whenever many of their claims are examined, they are shown to be either dishonest, unreliable or pure smoke and mirrors. Archwell is a case in point.

@AliceOlive You really don't have to choose either 😂 My dog would be a less boring conversationalist.

The american polls putting the couple below Andrew are simply 'most popular/least popular royals.

bit off track, but saw a photo of AC partner and she looked so like CC, so think he has a type.

Nope you're the on who can't a clear track on what you're actually talking about - hence why I keep talking about it. You won't answer what relevance her writing about her blow job scene in her supposed memoir would be. When asked you bring up lying and BLM and also won't answer what relevance that has to anything we're talking about. Don't worry - I know why you brought it up and why you can't answer. Toodles.

Now it’s Harry was lying and forced the palace to release this statement because nothing was really happening and it was all lies.

@skullbabe Ok. Listen up. I mentioned her acting a part where she gave a blow job in a car. It was part of her acting job. She wants to write a memoir about her life. Her life includes her acting job. Her acting job included giving a blow job in a car. Is that clear?

I asked will that appear in her book in the same way as the incident with Harry's frozen penis and his mothers face cream, did.

Those observations are unrelated to the other points I made, and I made several points about the couple veracity, hypocrisy etc.

What in god's name does an acting scene have to do with all of this? I am genuinely puzzled.
Actors act. They take a part, they act it. No idea why they should be criticised on it, it's just acting.

What is the hidden agenda here?

skullbabe · Today 16:44
Now it’s Harry was lying and forced the palace to release this statement because nothing was really happening and it was all lies.

Yes, something was happening, but Harry inflated it. No doubt at Meghan's request because she was very keen to be seen as Harry's girlfriend. Even supposedly said she would chuck him if he wouldn't acknowledge her. Nasty things were said, it seems, the but the overall towards Meghan at that time was positive

I think Harry believes everything he says. And I think Meghan genuinely had a hard time with the media.

But then she showed a grave lack of empathy for Kate in the way she spoke about Kate’s experience to Oprah. She participated in putting awful media pressure on Kate by repeating, diminishing and belittling her experience. She wasn’t there, she didn’t go through it for the sustained period of time that Kate did.

Meghan’s audacity in even breathing a family member’s name to the media, on a show she knew would be watched by the world framed my opinion of her. It was just plain old bullying.

Pmsl that her mentioning Kate is bullying

Yes it absolutely was.

Do you think Samantha speaking about her sister to the media is ok?

Her minimising Kate’s experiences was pretty bad form.

Rather like some posters on here

A little different don't you think?

She endlessly talked of Meghan not being pregnant, of surrogates, of M&H's children being actors and they didn't have children. So much so, she was banned from Twitter.

Not expecting a reply from the actual poster.

It's been my experience lately that posters who do drive-by, inarticulate posts like what I quoted above will then ignore any attempts at discussion.

Mumsnet SussexRoyal Chorus.

Meghan spoke spitefully about Sammantha, Sammantha spoke spitefully about Meghan.

Meghan spoke spitefully about Kate, minimising her experiences. Kate has not gone on a TV show to bitch about her SIL. She has stayed high

Meghan spoke spitefully about Sammantha, Sammantha spoke spitefully about Meghan

Not quite on the same level as being banned from Twitter as talking about her half sister faking pregnancies, surrogates and her children being actors. Surely?

It's just a different levels of the same behavior. Riding someone's coattails. Judging them publicly. Alluding at an intimate knowledge of the person that really doesn't exist.

Meghan has more of a platform than Samantha or her father. She was only given access to even meet Kate or know anything about her because of her marriage. In that sense she had a greater responsibility.

But what gave her the right to discuss and judge anyone else's media experience? And what was the purpose?

Meghan, her father, and her half siblings seem to specialise in being spiteful.