Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry just protecting the other "spares"

729 replies

Magnoliasunrise · 14/01/2023 06:52

Shocked to see in this mornings Telegraph that Harry is concerned for the other "spares" He just wants to break the bad parenting pattern and stop it happening to Charlotte or George. If I was W&K I would be absolutely LIVID by now. What does anyone else think?

www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/prince-harry-interview-bryony-gordon-spare-book/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
MysteryBelle · 14/01/2023 12:50

All this is driven by Meghan’s hatred and jealousy of Catherine and her children. She was scorned by William who she thought she could con as easily as Harry. Harry is doing all this on her orders, the book was to exonerate Meghan’s manipulations and attack his family. To demand apology and give Meghan what she wants, power and position, status, and superiority over Catherine. It is so obvious. She didn’t like walking behind Catherine, she didn’t like not procuring prince and princess titles for her children that she could merch off of, she didn’t like the truth of her bullying people ‘below’ her to get out, that’s why she is enraged because the Palace didn’t lie for her and cover up her bullying staff and making them cry over their desks, as Harry admits.

Twanky · 14/01/2023 12:51

Shelefttheweb · 14/01/2023 11:13

Styling himself after the Duke of Gloucester/Richard III perhaps? He ‘looked after’ his brother’s kids too.

Not proven and no evidence has ever been found! Shakespeare was the mouthpiece of the Tudors so he wrote R III to please them!

Blossomtoes · 14/01/2023 12:52

LlynTegid · 14/01/2023 10:48

Expressed in totally the wrong way but a very valid concern. Look at the previous four 'spares':

George V- probably the one who was successful, even though thrust into it in late twenties.
George VI- became King and then essentially chain smoked himself to a premature death aged in his fifties.
Princess Margaret- a failed marriage, great deal it seemed of unhappiness and died a premature death aged 71.
Prince Andrew- an alleged sex offender, who settled a claim out of court and this has damaged the monarchy as much as anything.

George VI was doing fine until his brother did a runner. He had a happy marriage, two adored daughters, a nice Mayfair house and access to houses in Scotland and Norfolk. The Queen Mother never forgave the Windsors for destroying their idyllic existence as spares.

queenofarles · 14/01/2023 12:52

Harry should stick to talking about his own children and the drawbacks of growing up in LA with two unstable parents.
I’m sure they love their children very much and are good parents at this early years stage, but they really are growing up absorbing all this negativity towards their only <Royal> family from their bitter parents, these books and interviews won’t disappear , in a few years time The Sussex’s children will be able to look them up , and then what? Either feel resentment towards their uncle and cousins or worse , feel resentment towards their parents.

AboutW · 14/01/2023 12:53

@MysteryBelle that sums it up perfectly. She is channeling all this through Harry's out of control sibling envy.

Anyways, Harry is not the spare.

SomethingOnce · 14/01/2023 12:53

Gosh I’ve never seen that footage before. I’m usually wary of things like that as I think too much can be read into an expression and nobody can beam all day long. But that evil expression at little 3? year old Charlotte is plain as day, horrifying!

Evil expression?! Are you a bit mad?

I’m no fan of MM, but that change in expression and dip of the head could easily be read as responsive concern for a little one hesitantly looking up. No way of any of us knowing.

This picking away at interactions involving children as entertainment is quite intrusive for the children.

bakalava · 14/01/2023 12:53

the drawbacks of growing up in LA with two unstable parents

Luckily for them, that is 'normal' in LA! 😂

Suzi89 · 14/01/2023 12:53

theworldhas · 14/01/2023 12:47

@Suzi89

Diana had three siblings, I seriously doubt she’d have stopped at one child whoever she was married to

People with such insight into the minds of complete strangers! It’s all very Eastenders at the end of the day.

Oh shut up. It’s exactly what you’re doing on this forum. Are you stupid enough to think Diana had a kid she didn’t want encase William needed a kidney?!

BigBoysDontCry · 14/01/2023 12:54

Whether they have a limited choice or not is clearly irrelevant. Who in life actually has a free choice? Most of us are limited by money or responsibilities or work or whatever. His choice is no more (and probably less) limited than 99.9% of the population of the world.

oohokay · 14/01/2023 12:55

@Boofay Sorry, to elaborate: if they were born above others, than of course within their own ranks there will be some born above others as well. E.g. Louis superior to Charlotte by birthright. As modern parents, Will & Kate may try their best to make them feel "equal", but realistically, the whole family's semi-jobless gilded existence is predicated upon this hierarchy. So it's not really a generational thing, just a realistic appraisal of a social construct.

OneDayIWillBeOrganised · 14/01/2023 12:55

BigBoysDontCry · 14/01/2023 12:54

Whether they have a limited choice or not is clearly irrelevant. Who in life actually has a free choice? Most of us are limited by money or responsibilities or work or whatever. His choice is no more (and probably less) limited than 99.9% of the population of the world.

We're not all limited as grown adults by our family though.

Lunde · 14/01/2023 12:56

LlynTegid · 14/01/2023 10:53

Not in the order of succession until it was changed in 2013(?) Prince Andrew was second in line until William was born.

But Anne was born "the spare" in 1950 and remained so for 10 years until Andrew was born in 1960. So much of her upbringing was as the spare

Suzi89 · 14/01/2023 12:56

MysteryBelle · 14/01/2023 12:50

All this is driven by Meghan’s hatred and jealousy of Catherine and her children. She was scorned by William who she thought she could con as easily as Harry. Harry is doing all this on her orders, the book was to exonerate Meghan’s manipulations and attack his family. To demand apology and give Meghan what she wants, power and position, status, and superiority over Catherine. It is so obvious. She didn’t like walking behind Catherine, she didn’t like not procuring prince and princess titles for her children that she could merch off of, she didn’t like the truth of her bullying people ‘below’ her to get out, that’s why she is enraged because the Palace didn’t lie for her and cover up her bullying staff and making them cry over their desks, as Harry admits.

A narcissist will cause so much havoc. I don’t even feel sorry for Harry though because he doesn’t seem like a very nice person.

OneDayIWillBeOrganised · 14/01/2023 12:57

@sep20 nothing too spectacular?? cocaine use, nazi dress up, pictures of his bare arse etc etc

NamelessTemptress01 · 14/01/2023 12:57

I think Meghan has validated how Harry was already feeling about being the ‘spare’. He is consumed with jealousy and being encouraged to analyse every single minor interaction and disagreement turning them into something else in his mind.

I really can’t understand a point of view where there is anything bad about being second sibling in this situation. He had the money and freedom, he could have any career that he wants, live anywhere he wants, marry whoever he wants. William has a lot of responsibility and restriction. I believe the majority of people would choose to be in Harry’s position rather than William.

Boofay · 14/01/2023 12:57

oohokay · 14/01/2023 12:40

@Boofay even as a millenial myself, all this boomer vs millenial talk re: an inherently fucked up institution makes me scratch my head.

The premise of the monarchy — and the extreme wealth and privilege they enjoy — is unequal birthright, or the idea they were born "above" others. This idea remains universally effed up no matter what generation you're in.

I'm guessing that even going to kindergarten at this age, they and their peers will be well aware they (C&L) are more special than all the other little children. (As someone with an early years edu background, kids are very alert to nuanced differences in treatment.)

Unless they leave or abolish the monarchy, no amount of generational "healing" will be able to unpick the fact that their entire existence is based upon the notion of a hierarchy.

@oohokay, oh I agree with you too. There's so much at play here. I'm on the cusp of being anti royal, but more that I just don't give a f.
I do believe that each generation has some work to do to fix problems from the generation or two previous, but you're right, the prince's kids have so much more to deal with.

What I don't understand is why Harry isn't allowed a memoir. They're pretty common in the world of rich, famous and/or influential. Why are other memoirs ok for people to spill their guts and yet Harry is bashed for telling his story?

MysteryBelle · 14/01/2023 12:58

AboutW · 14/01/2023 12:53

@MysteryBelle that sums it up perfectly. She is channeling all this through Harry's out of control sibling envy.

Anyways, Harry is not the spare.

Thank you. I agree, she is channeling and using Harry’s deep seated resentment and hatred toward his brother to get what she wants.

And absolutely correct, he is no longer the spare and hasn’t been for quite a while. He and Meghan are unhinged to declare that they in any capacity have the right to speak about William and Catherine’s children. They’re worse than I ever thought. Very evil with a sly agenda.

EsmaCannonball · 14/01/2023 13:00

There's absolutely no consistent evidence that being the spare (or one of the spares) in the royal family means you are destined to become an embittered fuckwit. Harry needs to realise that every family has its own unique problems and that every single person walking the planet has had to cope with issues relating to their own upbringing and family dynamics. I honestly think he'd do better to campaign for those less fortunate than members of the royal family and to relinquish all titles and inheritances related to his royal status and then campaign to abolish the monarchy altogether. However - as half-in, half-out taught us - he actually loves all the deference and privilege that comes with royal status and resents all the boring bits and public scrutiny.

DaughterOfPsychiatrist · 14/01/2023 13:02

I suppose Anne was young enough to not really feel any ‘Spare’ pressure before getting pushed down the line by Andrew?

If she’d been 13/14 it might’ve hit different?

Although possibly not, if Anne’s formidable, no-nonsense personality was already evident in childhood!

Margaret’s happiness was surely more hampered by the social mores of the time than by being second in line? Harry was able to marry his divorcee, Margaret sadly met hers at a very different time in history.

I’d much rather be the spare - still lots of luxury but far less responsibility.

Agree with above, if Harry had wanted it his children could’ve have a similar upbringing to Peter and Zara (I remember that their lack of titles was quite the news story In it’s day, seems to have been a very sensible decision of Anne’s!)

MarshaMelrose · 14/01/2023 13:04

RiverSkater · 14/01/2023 11:47

He's read somewhere about generational trauma and he's shining a light on it but he's taking it too far.

Blame Beyonce.

Twanky · 14/01/2023 13:06

BigBoysDontCry · 14/01/2023 12:09

He'll be jealous also that G, C and L are much adored by the public and A&L aren't. Not that there is anything said etc just that the public haven't been given the opportunity to see them/feel any connection to them. British Public will be told the difference in attitude is because they are inherently racist though.

Harry's DC could have had a similar upbringing to the Tindall/Philips DC, Relatively private but with occasional appearances and plenty of play with their cousins and their wider family.

That's so true, the children seem to have such fun together and I'm sure that George etc joins in when not 'on show' like the Jubilee concert. Does Harry never stop to think what he's denying them? There used to be some lovely pictures of Harry with the Cambridge/Tindall/Philips children at summer events, playing the madcap uncle but his children are not having those experiences which is a shame for them.

MarshaMelrose · 14/01/2023 13:10

theworldhas · 14/01/2023 12:37

@SomethingOnce

Clearly, he’s been terribly badly advised and he’s in a dreadful tangle

Perhaps he doesn’t care. He clearly blames the institution, the British media, and probably indirectly his father for the events that led up to mother’s death (to say nothing of the suspicions over the actual crash itself). His feelings toward his brother are probably also luke warm at best given how poor his relationship with Meghan is (regardless of who is to blame for that).

On the flip side he is now absolutely loaded, and has 400 million Americans (to say nothing for the rest of the world) deeply entertained and interested in anythjng and everything he says/does. I’m puzzled why people think he would be that worried about “finding a way back” into the hearts and minds of King Charles, the Daily Mail et al, and a hostile British public.

This seems highly unlikely as the population of the USA is only 333m. Obviously harryitis is catching.

Twanky · 14/01/2023 13:11

Maireas · 14/01/2023 12:33

Where's the evidence they had no choice?
I'm sure that they could have married where Beatrice did, for example.
They surely were able to assert themselves a tiny bit?

Or Zara, they had their wedding in Edinburgh and for a royal wedding it was relatively low-key.

MrsMitford3 · 14/01/2023 13:11

StatisticallyChallenged · 14/01/2023 10:21

I think Harry has implied (without mentioning the specific rumour) that it actually came from Camilla. But he also blames her for the original BM dress crying story when the author of that story suggests that the source was different. Timing does make the Sussex camp prime suspects

It's completely possible that W had an affair, but there seems to be zero evidence, just rumours being repeated and reported.

Giles Coren has admitted to making the whole thing up at a boozy lunch...

SomethingOnce · 14/01/2023 13:13

I’d venture that Princess Anne has her horses and is therefore entirely satisfied - neigh (see what I did there), delighted - with the way things turned out. Imagine being called upon to divert attention to all that monarch nonsense!

Swipe left for the next trending thread