Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

So the Royal Family isn’t racist?

361 replies

Harrysfrostbittentodger · 08/01/2023 23:09

That’s what I took from Harry’s recent interview. That they didn’t accuse the royal family of being racist in the Oprah interview?!

How are other people viewing this?

OP posts:
howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 15:03

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 14:53

Unconscious bias is still a form or racism, sexism or homophobia, yes.

So they did say the RF was racist.

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:13

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 15:03

So they did say the RF was racist.

They said what they said. HTH.

TangledWebOfDeception · 10/01/2023 15:21

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:02

Have you ever tried “correcting the narrative” with the British media? Harry tried putting out a statement when their relationship first went public in 2016 - requesting an end to the racism M was receiving - “Straight Outta Compton” etc and that had precisely zero effect. Why would this be any different?

It’s interesting (by which I mean tedious) that you know exactly what 2 people are thinking, doing etc etc despite never having met either of them.

They would have to be very dim indeed not to have known. They did it intentionally. Any claim that it wasn't done on purpose, and left uncorrected on purpose, is just fatuous.

That doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for his struggles. I do. Anyone would who has watched him try to cope with his mum's death and the awful aftermath, and also growing up under all the media scrutiny and the poison that brings.

Then he seemed to finally have found his purpose in the army and with charities/Invictus/partnership with W&K/etc and I was glad it all seemed to be falling into place as he got older. I was very happy for him when he and Meghan found each other and when they got married I thought it was fantastic that the sun shone so brightly for them - it seemed such a good omen and I hoped it would be the start of a very long and happy life for them as working royals.

It also doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for her struggles! The media are poison.

I continue to wish them well, but it's clear he needs to sort his head out. I don't think the drugs were/are good for him.

I think many people have/had a soft spot for Harry. But he needs to sort himself out. He's got to take responsibility for himself and stop it with the petty gripes - and I don't mean that all his gripes are petty, I hasten to add. But many of them are quite ridiculous and he does need to let them go if he wants any hope of getting over it. Fair enough, maybe he has to get it out of his system. In some ways I don't blame him! But...bitterness never heals.

(I've written more on this than I ever thought I would, in the past few days, tbh! Won't bore you anymore with the tedium.)

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 15:24

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:13

They said what they said. HTH.

It doesn't. It's splitting hairs to say they didn't say the RG was racist and they need to take some responsibility. If they think this is the presses fault they're wrong.

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:25

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 15:24

It doesn't. It's splitting hairs to say they didn't say the RG was racist and they need to take some responsibility. If they think this is the presses fault they're wrong.

It’s not hair splitting it’s fact. They used the term unconscious bias which is a form of racism.

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:26

TangledWebOfDeception · 10/01/2023 15:21

They would have to be very dim indeed not to have known. They did it intentionally. Any claim that it wasn't done on purpose, and left uncorrected on purpose, is just fatuous.

That doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for his struggles. I do. Anyone would who has watched him try to cope with his mum's death and the awful aftermath, and also growing up under all the media scrutiny and the poison that brings.

Then he seemed to finally have found his purpose in the army and with charities/Invictus/partnership with W&K/etc and I was glad it all seemed to be falling into place as he got older. I was very happy for him when he and Meghan found each other and when they got married I thought it was fantastic that the sun shone so brightly for them - it seemed such a good omen and I hoped it would be the start of a very long and happy life for them as working royals.

It also doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for her struggles! The media are poison.

I continue to wish them well, but it's clear he needs to sort his head out. I don't think the drugs were/are good for him.

I think many people have/had a soft spot for Harry. But he needs to sort himself out. He's got to take responsibility for himself and stop it with the petty gripes - and I don't mean that all his gripes are petty, I hasten to add. But many of them are quite ridiculous and he does need to let them go if he wants any hope of getting over it. Fair enough, maybe he has to get it out of his system. In some ways I don't blame him! But...bitterness never heals.

(I've written more on this than I ever thought I would, in the past few days, tbh! Won't bore you anymore with the tedium.)

As I said:

It’s interesting (by which I mean tedious) that you know exactly what 2 people are thinking, doing etc etc despite never having met either of them.

barneshome · 10/01/2023 15:38

No idea not interested in his rambling nonsense

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 16:40

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 15:25

It’s not hair splitting it’s fact. They used the term unconscious bias which is a form of racism.

So what's your point? They accused the RF of racism whichever way you look at it.

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 16:54

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 16:40

So what's your point? They accused the RF of racism whichever way you look at it.

I’ve made my point. What’s yours?

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 10/01/2023 17:06

They used the term unconscious bias which is a form of racism.

Harry doesn't agree. in the TB interview he says

the difference between racism and unconscious bias, the two things are different. But once it's been acknowledged, or pointed out to you as an individual, or as an institution, that you have unconscious bias, you therefore have an opportunity to learn and grow from that in order so that you are part of the solution rather than part of the problem. Otherwise unconscious bias then moves into the category of racism.

I don't remember any use of either 'racism' or 'unconscious bias' in the OW interview but it was definitely edited to show the RF as being racist. Plus they accepted the award for 'speaking out against structural racism in the Royal Family'. What was that referring to?

Malahaha · 10/01/2023 17:09

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 12:29

I read several sections of it & identified key claims that were demonstrably untrue. Whether it was ignorance or intentional on the part of the writer I don’t know, but one of the courtiers provably lied on one particular issue.

JK forwarded 2 reports to him from staff, who did not put in a formal complaint themselves, without their consent, which is a breach of procedure. He subsequently resigned. (Although he was later rehired, he’s now apparently jobless in India).

Then M needs to sue VL. She's done it before. In fact, the mantra is, if she doesn't sue, it's true.

She should also demand the release of the Palace's bullying report, as clearly it will vindicate her.

Rushingfool · 10/01/2023 17:27

StartupRepair · 09/01/2023 03:02

This claim on Oprah had a massive impact on the image of the Royal Family and the legacy of his grandparents. H and M accepted an award for saying it only a few weeks ago. Now he says he never said it? And he wants to serve the Commonwealth which last month was Empire 2.0? Oh please.

Totally agree. Their comments on Oprah are what led William to basically condemn Lady Susan Hussey in his efforts to prove that his family are not racists and will not tolerate racism (and Harry, with barely concealed schadenfreude, has cleverly tried to make William look like he's been cruel to said poor old Lady Susan Hussey, who Harry and Meghan love, and who Harry says never meant any harm), and what made William and Kate's Carribbean tour in March 2022, and Sophie and Edward's in April, more awkward than the tours might otherwise have been.

Not to mention that in all the upset, Ngozi Fulani had to close her shelter temporarily which would have had a direct effect on those women that needed refuge.

Awful, selfish little vendetta, where they don't care who else gets hurt in the fallout.

howmanybicycles · 10/01/2023 18:14

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 16:54

I’ve made my point. What’s yours?

You've not made a point that I can understand. My point is that regardless of whether they used the specific words 'the RF are racist', that is what they said

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 18:34

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 10/01/2023 17:06

They used the term unconscious bias which is a form of racism.

Harry doesn't agree. in the TB interview he says

the difference between racism and unconscious bias, the two things are different. But once it's been acknowledged, or pointed out to you as an individual, or as an institution, that you have unconscious bias, you therefore have an opportunity to learn and grow from that in order so that you are part of the solution rather than part of the problem. Otherwise unconscious bias then moves into the category of racism.

I don't remember any use of either 'racism' or 'unconscious bias' in the OW interview but it was definitely edited to show the RF as being racist. Plus they accepted the award for 'speaking out against structural racism in the Royal Family'. What was that referring to?

And that’s ok, we don’t have to all agree - discussing the finer points of ‘bias’, ‘prejudice’, ‘racism’ - is open to interpretation.

I don’t know what “edited to show the RF as being racist” even means.

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 18:38

Malahaha · 10/01/2023 17:09

Then M needs to sue VL. She's done it before. In fact, the mantra is, if she doesn't sue, it's true.

She should also demand the release of the Palace's bullying report, as clearly it will vindicate her.

It’s only a “mantra” to naive people who have no idea how the world (or law) works.

Mezmer · 10/01/2023 18:50

I think they implied they were racist. And so now the damage is done are now washing their hands of any involvement and can therefore accuse the media of spinning it.

Two birds. One stone. No flies on them.

Diverseopinions · 10/01/2023 19:35

Mezmer · 10/01/2023 18:50

I think they implied they were racist. And so now the damage is done are now washing their hands of any involvement and can therefore accuse the media of spinning it.

Two birds. One stone. No flies on them.

I thought that Meghan said to Oprah that if she were to deduce that there was a link between discussion about Archie's skin colour and whether he'd get a title or not, then she'd essentially be on the right lines. Words to that effect.

DIYing · 10/01/2023 19:45

StartupRepair · 10/01/2023 00:55

For 2 years we have been told that Meghan experienced it as racism so it was racism. No matter what the intent of the speaker. We were told it would be too damaging to reveal who said it. This was a shadow over the Queen's last years. Now we are being told, no it wasn't racism, just a media beatup. FFS.

This.

I think a lot of people completely believed they experienced racism, I did. It’s so prevalent that even someone not being intentionally malicious can be racist so balance of probability of an almost all whites family and staff…. Now a 180 and we’re not supposed to believe that and have to understand Harry’s personal definition of UB. I have a lot of sympathy for H&M in many ways, but there’s a level of batshit around how they go about doing things and describe them which just loses people.

bakalava · 10/01/2023 20:10

The stans should take note that both Harry and Meghan love Susan Hussey and felt that she had been targeted unfairly. They are wise enough to reject the binary thinking. Question is: can you achieve this too? 😉

Diverseopinions · 11/01/2023 05:13

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 18:34

And that’s ok, we don’t have to all agree - discussing the finer points of ‘bias’, ‘prejudice’, ‘racism’ - is open to interpretation.

I don’t know what “edited to show the RF as being racist” even means.

Meghan said that Oprah would be essentially correct in presuming that the discussions about whether the baby would get a title and the discussions about the colour of his skin were linked discussions. She was saying that the lines of discussion impacted on one another. She said the narratives and discussions were going on at the same time. Oprah asked if that meant that they were connected and Meghan said that if that was her interpretation, she wouldn't be wrong.

So it's nothing to do with how the broadcasters spun it.

Malahaha · 11/01/2023 05:38

Mirabai · 10/01/2023 18:38

It’s only a “mantra” to naive people who have no idea how the world (or law) works.

That's just a throwaway phrase, and yuu know it. The fact remains that the bullying charges are extremely serious and damaging to her reputation, so if even one of them is untrue, she'd surely be defending herself. But not a word...

And she should be very eager to have that bullying report published, because it would surely redeem her. Here she has a chance to rectify those rumours, if they are indeed false.

Lampzade · 11/01/2023 05:41

It is strange how some anti Sussex posters agree with the ‘unhinged’ Harry when it suits their narrative .

autienotnaughty · 11/01/2023 06:11

It's not really for Harry or any member of the royal family to decide if they are racist. They probably are on some level as most white people are because it's so intrinsic within society. Meghans experience of race is her experience it's not for others to decide what that looks like.

Whenharrymetsmelly · 11/01/2023 06:20

autienotnaughty · 11/01/2023 06:11

It's not really for Harry or any member of the royal family to decide if they are racist. They probably are on some level as most white people are because it's so intrinsic within society. Meghans experience of race is her experience it's not for others to decide what that looks like.

Totally agree, weird how it's seems so difficult for people to grasp. I can just imagine how some of them would react if they were in the same situation. They seem to lack both empathy and emotional intelligence 🤨

Rushingfool · 11/01/2023 07:27

autienotnaughty · 11/01/2023 06:11

It's not really for Harry or any member of the royal family to decide if they are racist. They probably are on some level as most white people are because it's so intrinsic within society. Meghans experience of race is her experience it's not for others to decide what that looks like.

The trouble with this is that it's really, really damaging to call someone racist and then say it's not for them to decide if they are or not because it"s what the accuser thinks and that's that. Like saying someone is a bully because it's what you think and not for them to decide. Or they're bitchy and not for them to decide because they probably are, after all most women are. In the end no-one is allowed to defend themselves. Like some awful added chapter of Animal Farm.

Swipe left for the next trending thread