Will you be watching the harry interview tonight at 9pm?

[Orangefir]

Or will it be Happy Valley 😃 ?

Agree he seems like a conspiracy theorist. Also a permanent victim, no responsibility for choosing to take drugs. No responsibility for relationships with his family.

Her manager got a % of her own autobiography mirroring what Harry said so he is hypocrite out for a soundbite.

Has he had a bash at Mumsnet yet?

I think he’s getting frustrated, because Harry keeps speaking over him and shushing him with his hand gestures.
Harrys coming across like he’s trying very hard to keep composed but these flashes of irritation and anger are coming through.

Values???

Loyalty to family? - nope
Service to county - nope
Not selling your sole to the media for money - nope
Respecting the military code of not adding up your kills - nope

I'm confused!! - what are Harry's values?

Yes . I think he’s quite hostile to TB when challenged. Very defensive .

I don't understand why he says that anytime a story says "palace sources" it is coming from the palace, but they're covering their tracks by being an "unnamed source."

I can totally believe this happens, I'm not disputing that. But it can't be the case for every story that gets attributed to palace sources, because that would mean there are no members of staff who ever give a journalist a story that then gets attributed to "a source". And that doesn't sound very likely.

He doesn’t like Tom not doing an Oprah and fawning over his truth

Camilla's not coming across well in this at all.

My ex friends who are conspiracy theorists sound like Harry. They went a bit barmy following lockdown and I sometimes wonder whether things would gave been different if it wasn't for Covid.

Didn’t even know about it and watched call the midwife and happy valley! Sunday’s are so much brighter cos of them lol

Cannot wait for this, although they might cover the US interviews rather than this one. There's only so much anyone can listen to the same blathering over different networks. One of them was a US military interrogator - they could employ Harry the blatherer to torture prisoners with his incessant complaining about absolutely nothing of any substance.

Why not take their titles away?

Oh Andrew.

I have a lot of sympathy with what he is saying about the media. They do destroy lives and are racist and misogynistic.

I've met Catherine, she's better in person, she's really warm, funny and easy to talk to.

I get what you are saying she can come over as stiff or unsure on public speaking events.

But I suppose I would be too if I thought it was going to be scrutinized and archived for the next millennia 🤣 like will one of my sentences be immortalised in a drone display on NYE on London 🤣😳

I don't even like doing a presentation in work, teams or in person the nerves get to me. But in the coffee room or office I'm as cool as a cucumber and make everyone laugh 😳

Not commenting on this specific interview as I can’t bear to watch it myself but what you’ve written here, I know to be true. Back in the 80s, my Dad fought for years to get my Mum treatment for postnatal depression that turned into psychosis. Was told for years nothing wrong except perhaps marital issues. So awful for us all but especially my Mum. Even after her diagnosis, over the decades a few individuals, part of her medical support, have snidely accused my Dad of all sorts of nasty stuff based on what she told them when she’s had a regression.

@Harrysfrostbittentodger

It's the contrast between 2 women who have to be in public.
If Harry has married one of his past gf I don't think this level of hatred would have been generated.
Harry was down at heel brother, and suddenly he is with a savvy business woman who is streets ahead and excels at public speaking?

Re the book it sounds like Gordon Ramsey reading it.

What's worse than the dog bowel allegations waa that Willam said " don't tell Megan". That's abhorrent if true.

Agreed, one who has, as he admits 'seen behind the curtain'....

He's possibly a bit too well acquainted with some closeted skeletons for the Palace to stay quiet and emerge from all of this with their reputations intact.

This interview is nothing more than a not so thinly veiled threat.

'If I can talk about these things, imagine what damage I could do next Pa.'

Why Harold? He was Henry, aka Harry. All v odd.

I dunno I feel this absolves him of responsibility tbh.

I like Megan and I feel that Harry is one to watch out for and is very disingenuous.

I don't agree that Megan is pushing him or "injecting him with her poison" as others have literally said in other threads.
I think it's him

To be fair, the Clarkson article was shockingly vile and misogynistic.

I think the correct wording would be William and me. It’s correct to name the other person first.

It's probably not verbatim

And it's someone who has good boundaries who tells people when they overstep them

God he's an insufferable little brat
He's obviously been allowed to shout his mouth off all through childhood and not been challenged

@WeWereInParis All the staff are legally not allowed to say anything.