Will the RF ever respond?

[LotteryWinPlease]

Never complain, never explain. But do we think there will be a time that someone will have to say something? The whole thing is just so, so sad 💔 I feel dreadfully sorry for KC

@goodbyestranger
I'm sixty plus and still have Ted tucked into the end of my bed every night, he's been there a very long time!

It takes two to have a fight.
So WHAT did HARRY say to William? Oh dear Harry has forgotten what he said so it did he tell the ghost writer who didn't include it so as to make William look as bad as possible..
Also if King Charles stood between him and William and told them: "Please, boys... don't make my final years a misery." That means BOTH of them were saying things, but once more the Harry part is missing.
This whole book has been edited to only make others look bad,

It does not take two to have a fight.

It's bizarre that Harry is open to the idea. Both his father and brother slag off his wife. His dad jokes about James Hewitt being his real dad. His brother punches him at intervals. His 70+ year old dad still sleeps with a teddy. They are all fucked up and Harry to my mind seems a great deal more sane and grounded than either of those two.

Where is the evidence of either his dad or brother slagging off his wife?

Nope, Charles did not joke about James Hewitt being Harry's dad.

Where does Harry say William punched him?

Where does it say Charles sleeps with a teddy?

You are quite literally making shit up. But how you can think Harry is grounded when he's revealed details of losing his virginity, his frost bitten penis, his magical wife singing to seals and pissing himself on a boat.

No details have emerged as to which stories he means but it's perhaps not hard to guess. Just after the Sussexes' wedding, tales began to emerge about Meghan's behaviour towards Palace staff, about demands she reportedly made over the 2018 ceremony, about how she had made Kate, now the Princess of Wales, cry.

Well that's a quote from the BBC link posted above and H appears to have covered those stories in his book so they were apparently true. And H seems to have bizarrely made M appear the villain in them.

No you are NOT quoting from the book you liar.

Charles made no reference to Hewitt at all in his joke. The alleged real father of Harry (and William) was a mental patient in Broadmoor who claimed to be the real Prince of Wales, ergo Harry's real father.

You are peddling lies. Shame on you.

So rude.

The book refers to the story about the detained patient. It also refers to Charles telling ('joking' - funny guy) Harry that he might not even be Harry's real father.

Get your facts straight.

Reading backwards. Rockets same to you eg Harry tells Charles not to speak about his wife like that when he tells Harry not to bring Meghan to Balmoral and William slags Meghan off during one of the altercations. Both instances are referenced in the book. Do your effing homework.

You're trying to backtrack and failing. Your posy above says Charles joke was about Hewitt.
You then claimed to be quoting that from the book.

But the book doesn't reference Charles mentioning Hewitt in the joke AT ALL.

You lied twice. Own it.

In fact at least 3 lies - Harry never says he was punched, you "misquoted" again.

@spanieleyes I do hope Ted keeps you warm!

I suggest it's you who needs to do yours, otherwise you're going to continue to embarrass yourself.

The joke made was in reference to both boys and the man in Broadmoor. Context is key.

Furthermore, you have one side of the story. What is it exactly that Charles is suppose to have said about Meghan?

All those things are taken direct from extracts of the book and cited in the press

That what I said. And that's what I meant. These are all things reported from the Spanish translation and cited in the English press. It's not a hard to comprehend, or shouldn't be.

I am absolutely correct.

No, you are plain LYING.

Oh for goodness sake read the book or read everything which has been reported in the broadsheets and tabloids.

First link which pops up, nothing to do with the unwell man claiming he was the Prince of Wales: www.lancs.live/news/celebs-tv/prince-harry-james-hewitt-rumours-25919835

Jesus, this is all pretty desperate.

That's so nasty. Hardly a fetish, if anything it's probably something they used as security blankets as children. That seems very sad to me if they still need these as adults

RF should just ignore H from now on. Any contact with him, H is just going to spin it and try to cash in. Overtime H will be wheeled into news rooms now and then to comment as an opposing view on anything the RF do or say.

I read them. You are lying. You have posted on here that Harry wrote

That William punched Harry. Harry did not write that. That is You LYING

That KC joked about Hewitt being Harry's father. Harry did not write that. That is You LYING

Stop fucking well LYING

I think they absolutely should speak out when certain vile comments like Jeremy Clarkson's one are made in the media. Especially when they then champion causes about domestic violence or mental health. Makes them seem hypocrites.

I disagree completely.

Start answering one, and you then have to answer all (or 'conclusions will be drawn')

I can see why anyone would want to avoid that madness.

Whenharrymetsmelly it may not be a fetish in your book but it's fucking weird in mine.

BMW6 crazed capitalization. These are all things which have been reported in numerous places, directly quoting from Harry's book except for the punch. The punch could admittedly have been a push, forceful enough to fell Harry to the ground. Violent either way.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11602603/Harry-claims-Charles-joked-real-father-amid-Diana-rumour.html

There you go, another one. Not the Broadmoor patient please note.

Well you've admitted your use of the word Punch was wrong (aka LYING)

Now admit that you lied about the joke.

And you are not reading your own post material.

The joke Harry wrote about was not about Hewitt.

Well done for confirming I am indeed correct and your claims otherwise are lies.

BMW6 you are quite wrong on both counts.

Harry doesn't specify whether he was knocked to the ground with a punch or a forceful push. So it could have been either. No lie. Either way the incident clearly indicates that William is prone to violence when frustrated. Punch or another violent strike is fairly immaterial in the context.

The two links I supplied (and there are plenty more with accounts of the same part of the book) show that Charles joked on a number of occasions about possibly not being Harry's father. One story involved the inpatient at Broadmoor but none of the other occasions did. If Harry himself says (in writing in the book) that the link to James Hewitt was utterly clear ('sadistic') then who do you think you are to deny it?