If PW told the world that H had shoved him over/hit him, I'd probably believe it. Mainly because he doesn't have a track record in half truths/lies and it would be hugely significant for PW to come out and tell that kind of story publicly.
But if you'd asked me a few years back, I would have believed H too.
The only reason for my healthy dose of scepticism is that H seems to be fond of missing out key facts, telling half the story or ALWAYS painting himself as the victim even when events suggest that it's not the case. If H were ever able to put forward a more honest and balanced account, taking some responsibility, he'd be more believable. But the absolute bollocks he's spewed in recent years means that I'm loathe to believe a word he says unless it can be independently proven.
And that story about PW attacking him has more holes than the colander in my kitchen. Something may well have happened - but I suspect H hasn't given the full story, or acknowledged his part in it. The story just doesn't make sense when you dissect it, step by step.
I'm not a fan of H & M, but the truth really does matter to me (autistic brain here!). The reason I dislike H&M is because of their loose relationship with the truth, and their willingness to alter reality to suit their narrative. If I thought H was telling the truth here, I would say. But my gut instinct is that it's another half-spun story, warped to suit his adopted victim stance.