Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Do Harry and Meghan realise hardly anyone supports them?

897 replies

Spck · 02/01/2023 21:40

So everywhere there seems to be complete negativity towards the Netflix documentary and the autobiography coming out. They seem to be universally slated as whingers.
so how much do you think this feeds back to them? It must be v easy to live in a bubble with close supporters telling them they are doing a grand job. But how much reality do you think gets through of how badly they are coming across,

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 09:48

PicturesOfDogs · 05/01/2023 09:45

But if you’re getting complaints from your staff in the ‘family business’ about your brothers wife, you wouldn’t go to your brother and speak to him about it?
Should William have taken it up directly with her? Or just ignored it?
What should he have done?

Well maybe he should have dealt with the aspects he had responsibility for and that he could control like telling his own press staff to stop feeding stories about her to the press wolves. Then maybe trying to befriend her and yes putting distance in between himself and her if he really didn’t like her.

Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 09:51

I do think there was something in her way of coming off being very difficult for members of staff where they worked by the way but I don’t think she was in a good place at the time and I think helping her and not isolating her would have improved things.

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 09:53

Rockybooboo · 05/01/2023 09:48

Yes I don't like my brother's wife but I'd never say that to my brother.

There are aspects of my brother in law that I dont like. I tell my sister. She doesn't like them either.
But if you can't criticise about your brother's wife, are you equally not allowed to criticise your husband's brother or mother? Are they out of bounds too?

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 09:54

Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 09:51

I do think there was something in her way of coming off being very difficult for members of staff where they worked by the way but I don’t think she was in a good place at the time and I think helping her and not isolating her would have improved things.

Maybe if Harry had sat down and talked to William instead of getting angry, they could have found a way to help her?

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:57

Well maybe he should have dealt with the aspects he had responsibility for and that he could control like telling his own press staff to stop feeding stories about her to the press wolves. Then maybe trying to befriend her and yes putting distance in between himself and her if he really didn’t like her

But how will that resolve the situation that’s been reported to him - that she’s bullying their shared staff? William has a duty of care to their staff to stop that happening. He can’t do that if he apparently can’t mention it to the other family member who might have some influence on her behaviour.

Divebar2021 · 05/01/2023 09:58

I wonder where this assault is supposed to have taken place - I don’t see how we can avoid a police investigation of this incident if it was in the U.K. Harry must know that surely? How does that sit with the statement that he wants to be reconciled with William and Charles?

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:58

Maybe if Harry had sat down and talked to William instead of getting angry, they could have found a way to help her?

The first version we heard of this altercation, in Robert Lacey’s book, was that William rang Harry to discuss it and Harry angrily put the phone down on him.

lightand · 05/01/2023 10:00

Their main problem is they dont forgive anyone.
I would like to know if they forgive each other?
Or will they turn on each other one day?

Everything becomes a catalogue of things done wrong to them.

Memam · 05/01/2023 10:01

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:40

My understanding of it is that Harry mentions William describing Meghan using those terms in the book because Harry wants to make a point that William had, just like everyone else, taken on the media's descriptions of her rather than actually knowing the truth / knowing her.

And yet in the Netflix series William says those media descriptions of her were leaked to the press…by William! So he’s apparently angry that William is lazily using media descriptions of her that he believes came from William in the first place. It makes no sense at all.

(It also ignores the reality - that William did know Meghan by this stage, as he’d first met her a couple of years ago. And, more importantly, they shared offices and staff, so he had been told about how she was treating their shared staff).

William said? Or do you mean Harry, because William doesn't say anything in the Netflix documentary. Members of the RF had nothing to say about / in response to the series.

I think you are confusing what has been said, and 'when' during the timeline.

To explain, in the documentary there is a scene where Harry and Meghan point out that quite often untrue/slanderous(?) articles are published in a tabloid and they usually begin with 'a former aide to the Duchess of Sussex / Meghan Markle' so as to give the impression that the aide was very close to her and knows all of her shortcomings, is now a close aide to William or working in his press office. Meghan and Harry, who are clearly in California at the time when that scene was shot, also point out for that article to have been published, William must have OK'd it (as opposed to leaking anything).

The revelations in the articles today about William hitting Harry to the ground occurred at Nottingham Cottage which was years ago pre-Megxit. That was also when William described Meghan as difficult, rude and abrasive.

Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 10:04

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:58

Maybe if Harry had sat down and talked to William instead of getting angry, they could have found a way to help her?

The first version we heard of this altercation, in Robert Lacey’s book, was that William rang Harry to discuss it and Harry angrily put the phone down on him.

I suspect Harry did try to raise his key issue, the press leakings, in private many times but the fact is that the palaces have been doing that for decades and so they don’t see anything wrong with it. You cannot have a conversation with someone who cannot see your perspective. If somethings that something which is clearly morally wrong is right where do you go with that?

PicturesOfDogs · 05/01/2023 10:04

Samcro · 05/01/2023 09:47

its getting boring now that people just can't believe that PW could ever be in the wrong.
2 brothers have a row, thats normal, 2 brothers have a row and one hits the other, not normal.
also I wish people would accept that PW can speak up, he chooses not to..

For me this is it though.
The only person we’re getting a first hand account from is Harry, and he has never shown any accountability or admitted any wrong doing.

If he had come out and said, X happened, I said this and I shouldn’t have, and then he reacted like this, which he shouldn’t have, it would be more believable.

But his accounts are so one sided and biased, people automatically think ‘it doesn’t add up’

The only thing he’s said he’s ever done wrong is wearing the Nazi costume (as far as I can recall - happy to be corrected). But even this he’s apparently blaming William for now.

I’m sure there was wrong on both sides, there usually is. But where is Harry admitting any wrong on his part? No one is perfect, but there’s absolutely no reflection.

He needs to sack his therapist, they’re clearly shit

Rockybooboo · 05/01/2023 10:09

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 09:53

There are aspects of my brother in law that I dont like. I tell my sister. She doesn't like them either.
But if you can't criticise about your brother's wife, are you equally not allowed to criticise your husband's brother or mother? Are they out of bounds too?

I don't like my sister in law because she's got some bigoted views. I wish she wasn't my sister in law. My brother shares these views so what would the point?

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 10:13

Divebar2021 · 05/01/2023 09:58

I wonder where this assault is supposed to have taken place - I don’t see how we can avoid a police investigation of this incident if it was in the U.K. Harry must know that surely? How does that sit with the statement that he wants to be reconciled with William and Charles?

In Nottingham Cottage in early 2019

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 10:20

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:58

Maybe if Harry had sat down and talked to William instead of getting angry, they could have found a way to help her?

The first version we heard of this altercation, in Robert Lacey’s book, was that William rang Harry to discuss it and Harry angrily put the phone down on him.

You could sort of see the story had been edited, either consciously or subconsciously, because it didn't make sense. And if things don't make sense, they're not true. (A Judge Judy quote there.) It's like there are holes where something not mentioned happened.
It would be interesting to get a fuller account from Lacey and marry the two stories up. I wonder who the source was for Lacey. It must have been relayed by one of the two men in the first instance

MarshaMelrose · 05/01/2023 10:23

Memam · 05/01/2023 10:01

William said? Or do you mean Harry, because William doesn't say anything in the Netflix documentary. Members of the RF had nothing to say about / in response to the series.

I think you are confusing what has been said, and 'when' during the timeline.

To explain, in the documentary there is a scene where Harry and Meghan point out that quite often untrue/slanderous(?) articles are published in a tabloid and they usually begin with 'a former aide to the Duchess of Sussex / Meghan Markle' so as to give the impression that the aide was very close to her and knows all of her shortcomings, is now a close aide to William or working in his press office. Meghan and Harry, who are clearly in California at the time when that scene was shot, also point out for that article to have been published, William must have OK'd it (as opposed to leaking anything).

The revelations in the articles today about William hitting Harry to the ground occurred at Nottingham Cottage which was years ago pre-Megxit. That was also when William described Meghan as difficult, rude and abrasive.

But Harry said he was complaining about these briefings against him and Meghan while they were still in the RF. That's part of the reason why they wanted to leave.

WhatATimeToBeAlive · 05/01/2023 10:25

Chocoverload · 02/01/2023 21:42

Most of my friends including myself are totally supportive of them. That’s probably because we don’t believe the crap published in the tabloids.

It's their crap in the tabloids.

I absolutely do not support them, they are becoming caricatures.

Divebar2021 · 05/01/2023 10:27

@MarshaMelrose

Thanks for that. U.K. law then… let’s see what happens. I’m presuming H&M won’t be coming to the Coronation now… can you imagine the kerfuffle?

Memam · 05/01/2023 10:37

My last post was in response to @Serenster's specific point.

Harry said they left because of the lies that were being fabricated about himself and Meghan which started after their Australia tour.

Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 10:49

Divebar2021 · 05/01/2023 10:27

@MarshaMelrose

Thanks for that. U.K. law then… let’s see what happens. I’m presuming H&M won’t be coming to the Coronation now… can you imagine the kerfuffle?

Well maybe it is William who shouldn’t be invited maybe he might deck someone because he doesn’t like their wife much.

Wiluli · 05/01/2023 11:00

Are you crazy ? Lots of people support them . In fact a lot more support them than not .

PicturesOfDogs · 05/01/2023 11:16

Stickytoff · 05/01/2023 09:48

Well maybe he should have dealt with the aspects he had responsibility for and that he could control like telling his own press staff to stop feeding stories about her to the press wolves. Then maybe trying to befriend her and yes putting distance in between himself and her if he really didn’t like her.

His staff though? What should he have done about that?
Looks like you’re saying he should have told them to stop telling people?

BethJ62 · 05/01/2023 11:19

Memam · 05/01/2023 10:37

My last post was in response to @Serenster's specific point.

Harry said they left because of the lies that were being fabricated about himself and Meghan which started after their Australia tour.

No, they left because they didn’t get the half in/ half out they wanted .

Roussette · 05/01/2023 11:33

Serenster · 05/01/2023 09:37

I know posters like to insist that she was loved, up until Oprah or Bradby or whatever.

Well.... the threads on here don't indicate that, if we are a guage for the public.
There were awful posts on here on threads right from when they got engaged. Read through 'I'm fucking sick of Harry & Meghan already' started on the day they did their engagement interview.

I think you are looking back through rose coloured spectacles. There was a poster on one of these threads last week, and another yesterday, who actually posted that she went 'right off her' watching the engagement interview. And then the nastiness started, slow at first, then building up to this.

Two things about this:

Firstly, there are plenty of posters in MN - many on this thread in fact - who have no time at all for anyone in the Royal Family because they loathe the institution and everything is stands for. You are now telling us their posts were awful and shouldn’t have been allowed when about Meghan joining the Royal Family? And yet you support those posters when they target other members. A bit hypocritical no?There are awful posts about the rest of them all the time. If you can criticise any member of the Royal Family on the grounds that you resent all of them, why would a new joiner be exempt? And so why wouldn’t Meghan have been criticised right from when they got engaged?

Secondly, I find it quite odd that you would discount a poster’s presumably genuine response to seeing someone give an interview on television. We are human, we react and respond to those kind of things all the time. And we are entitled to form our own opinions based on what we personally see and hear. As do you yourself. It would have been reasonable criticism had you raised your eyebrows at someone saying they read about the interview int he paper and formed a negative view - but they didn’t. They specifically said they watched the actual interview.

Your post makes no sense to me.

I illustrated a point that seems to have passed you by.

"You are now telling us their posts were awful and shouldn’t have been allowed when about Meghan joining the Royal Family? And yet you support those posters when they target other members"

This bit. What does it mean? I said there were vitriolic threads and posts way way before Meghan did anything that anyone would consider 'wrong'. She just got engaged, was American and different, that's it. I didn't say 'they shouldn't be allowed'
I just said they happened.

What has that got to do with the last sentence, (which I have no idea what you mean).

"Secondly, I find it quite odd that you would discount a poster’s presumably genuine response to seeing someone give an interview on television."

I only typed one bit of it 'I found her off' or 'went right off her' ... it was far more of a rant than that. She smiled too much, she smirked, she pawed Harry, she was American... it was rude and horrible and went on and on.

Let's leave it there shall we? We rarely find common ground.

HotChoxs · 05/01/2023 11:52

Wiluli · 05/01/2023 11:00

Are you crazy ? Lots of people support them . In fact a lot more support them than not .

Support them in what though? What are they doing?

UmbrellaLegs · 05/01/2023 11:53

Chocoverload · 02/01/2023 21:42

Most of my friends including myself are totally supportive of them. That’s probably because we don’t believe the crap published in the tabloids.

but you believe a carefully crafted media documentary?

Swipe left for the next trending thread