Your post makes no sense to me.
I illustrated a point that seems to have passed you by.
"You are now telling us their posts were awful and shouldn’t have been allowed when about Meghan joining the Royal Family? And yet you support those posters when they target other members"
This bit. What does it mean? I said there were vitriolic threads and posts way way before Meghan did anything that anyone would consider 'wrong'. She just got engaged, was American and different, that's it. I didn't say 'they shouldn't be allowed'
I just said they happened.
What has that got to do with the last sentence, (which I have no idea what you mean).
"Secondly, I find it quite odd that you would discount a poster’s presumably genuine response to seeing someone give an interview on television."
I only typed one bit of it 'I found her off' or 'went right off her' ... it was far more of a rant than that. She smiled too much, she smirked, she pawed Harry, she was American... it was rude and horrible and went on and on.
Let's leave it there shall we? We rarely find common ground.