Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Jeremy Clarkson

1000 replies

kirinm · 17/12/2022 17:40

Is a piece of shit. I refuse to link to his article in which he explicitly says he hates her and can't wait for the day he can physically assault her.

Can the Kate sycophants tell me again how this all happened to her and is totally normal and acceptable?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Lampzade · 18/12/2022 23:04

it would be great if conservations would evolve and grow organically around the matter in hand which is that nasty article written by JC and how abhorrent it is
i am the mother of two daughters-and this article made me think of Sarah Everard and
Zars Aleena. among others .

Kingping · 18/12/2022 23:09

Yes Aliceolive! A voice of reason! Exactly! jezza is awful, and I’ve been offended by his racism for years. I even wrote to the BBC once over his usage of racist slurs. However he only represents himself. Even his own daughter called him out too. The tenuous bs being used to tar anyone that he’s come into contact with just reveals the agenda of some posters on here. Also, if those very same posters bothered to pay attention (or were just honest) to the opening statement of this thread, they would own it was goady and that it was slyly trying to tar other people. It literally mentions Kate, and lots of posts earlier in the thread were claiming it was all camillas fault somehow. Whys it’s ok for those posters to muddy the water, and change the focus of the chat? Hmmmm I wonder why that isn’t called out and denounced as ‘derailing’ 😂

Also, by sharing the blame with Kate and Camilla, let’s not end up accidentally partially absolving jeremy just cos some posters are too obsessed with fulfilling their narrative. He deserves the full brunt of condemnation, and maybe like last time, he will end up losing a few lucrative contracts again. Least he deserves. Arrogant racist old gammon that he is.

Kingping · 18/12/2022 23:16

And if you think complaining about a random online chat on an anonymous forum because it hasn’t gone the exact way you’d like, until all the posters behave and only post content you approve of, will somehow make the world a better place, god help you 😂

ImaginaryDragon · 19/12/2022 00:12

Kingping · 18/12/2022 22:36

Lol - nah it’s ok - not my job to educate you, don’t have the time nor the inclination. You crack on 😘

No your job is to derail this thread about a really serious matter and make it another M&H hate filled conspiracy thread. Shame on you.

Kingping · 19/12/2022 01:10

Whilst I could stoop to your level and snap back, that you’re the one using a serious matter to score cheap points and advance your thinly veiled agenda. Instead, I’m starting to find your posts, more specifically, their obsessive nature and charged emotive language, a little concerning. Being so emotionally invested, in a random celebrity couple, just isn’t very healthy. Can’t imagine such ‘dedication’ would impress Meghan and Harry. Especially in light of how Harry himself has (negatively) described obsessive fans in the past. Maybe take a leaf out of their book, find your freedom, and go live your own life in the real world. Instead of vicariously living through theirs. And your constant bullying of other posters with false accusations, isn’t even offensive. It’s actually quite sad. Must be exhausting to feel so triggered and persecuted all the time, seeing conspiracies everywhere. Hope you find some meaning and fulfilment in the near future to focus on instead. All this pseudo self righteous indignation is quite revealing. Hope you can get the help you quite clearly need, and soon. Im removing this thread from my watch list, so won’t see any more of your comments so please don’t waste your own time or raise your own blood pressure by continuing to vent your spleen at me. No point following me to hound me on other unrelated threads. It’s beyond tedious at this point 🥱 and easily solved with a simple NC x

Lampzade · 19/12/2022 01:56

Thread derailment is obviously the aim of some of the posters on this thread. Their rage and unhinged posts are there for everyone to see

Thankfully right minded, decent people have seen through them

GreenLunchBox · 19/12/2022 02:32

Kingping · 18/12/2022 22:06

@bloodyplanes
At least people in the real world are taking their inaccuracies and exaggerations seriously

www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/12/17/rishi-sunak-take-netflix-amid-harry-meghan-accuracy-row/

terrible that streaming giants like Netflix and Amazon aren’t regulated, especially when it’s evident from this forum a percentage of the population don’t have critical thinking skills

Dominic Raab has numerous bullying allegations against him (a third of his department at last count) but Sunak won't sack him, Sunak stood by Johnson with all his lying and law-,breaking and still defends him, and the Brexit Leave campaign has impoverished us to a catastrophic degree and was based on lies. Sunak is not investigating any of these but is announcing he's going after Netflix because of Harry and Meghan?🧐

I despise what this country has become, but honestly the populace deserve it and worse.

GreenLunchBox · 19/12/2022 02:39

Oh and Mone allegedly trousering £29 million+ , Dido Harding "losing" several billion in test and trace etc etc etc... fucks sake, it's relentless and embarrassing. Radio silence from Sunak about these scandals but he loves to jump on the Meghan and Harry train because he knows the Daily Mail nation will lap it up.
What a weak and pathetic man. Certainly not my leader.

He knows the British public are easily distracted and pliable so of course a chancer like him is going to try the old "LOOK OVER THERE!!!"

GreenLunchBox · 19/12/2022 02:49

Sunak's wife's company is still operating out of Russia despite Sunak making every one else 'sanction' them. In other words he doesn't take the Russian problem seriously.

Soooo glad he's 'taking issues seriously' 🙄🤔
Harry and Meghan's Netflix documentary is top priority....yay! Good thing there's nothing else going on in the country!

DeeCeeCherry · 19/12/2022 05:48

Lampzade·
It is shocking that a thread used to focus on the vile misogynistic comments by Clarkson (which effects all of us as women) is now being derailed and turned into another anti Meghan thread

I'm not shocked. It just reiterates how middleaged White men with money and power are revered. There are women who'll support this man who wants a woman to be publicly sexually humiliated, and have shit thrown at her by a baying crowd. Thats the state of play here. Im not shocked that the newspaper editor is a woman either.

The MM obsessive haters are cool with racism sexism misogyny and wishing violence upon a woman - as long as it's not a woman who looks like them.

Men like Clarkson are socialised in such a way here that they feel free to open their repulsive mouths and say as they please.

Its an alarming thought that some of the hordes of women supporting and condoning hate of MM, constantly writing about her on MM too, are the mothers of sons. Sons who wont be shown and taught to respect and value women. & that misogyny, sexism, racism and unfounded hate of a woman is entirely unacceptable and never a joke

Roussette · 19/12/2022 06:39

AliceOlive · 18/12/2022 21:59

Right, how dare she not predict that someone invited to the same party she was attending would later be nasty toward her family? What a wretched woman!

To be honest... I would choose not to attend if JC and PMorgan were there. There is no doubt the Palace would have the guest list in advance (in case of any awkwardness, or to be able to answer questions) and they would've seen those two disgusting men invited. To then decide to attend is too much.

It's like if a NDN of mine had a party and dropped that they would be there, I'd say NO thanks!
Cue posters saying... so Camilla should not be able to go to a party because they will be there?
Errrmm yes. Exactly that. We pay her to fulfil a role, there would be plenty of other parties to go to and to happily mix with men who openly harrass someone in your own family is just awful.

Inkanta · 19/12/2022 07:50

Imagine King Charles opening his mouth and saying enough is enough. But no, instead his Queen goes out with JC and PM to lunch. What’s the point of Queen Camilla’s being patron for woman's aid and domestic abuse or King Charles’ charity work if they can’t speak out against their own daughter-in-law being abused online and in print?

lollipoprainbow · 19/12/2022 07:52

@Inkanta so true. I hate all this never explain, never complain crap. Just openly address the situation.

Itsthewhitehat · 19/12/2022 07:56

I would go. I wouldn’t avoid parties they attend. Why should I?

Infact I am attending a party in January where someone harassed my mum. My mum recently died so won’t be there. I won’t avoid and hide and miss out. I won’t be mixing with them. However, if that person tries to ‘mix with me’ they will be told in a calm and quiet way that I do not wish to speak to them and why. But I won’t hide away.

Different people handle things in different ways

The fact Camilla is paid to ful fill a role doesn’t mean she also can’t do anything, at all, that’s not an official duty. Do non of the RF, including H&M when they were in, also attend events just because they wanted to?

Roussette · 19/12/2022 08:01

I would go. I wouldn’t avoid parties they attend. Why should I?

Because you have a role as an advocate for a domestic violence charity and because your daughter in law is being abused and harrassed by these men.

What’s the point of Queen Camilla’s patronage, if her and Charles can’t speak out against their own daughter-in-law being abused online and in print?
It's nothing to do with liking her or not. It’s bigger than that.

Rightio.. we wouldn't want Camilla to miss out would we Hmm

LimeCheesecake · 19/12/2022 08:26

AliceOlive · 18/12/2022 21:59

Right, how dare she not predict that someone invited to the same party she was attending would later be nasty toward her family? What a wretched woman!

But Morgan was at the party - he’s already said terrible things over and over and over about Camilla’s SDIL. By choosing to continue to socialise with people like him, it does get other shits like Clarkson and newspaper editors the impression Charles and Camilla don’t mind. It makes it very clear Camilla won’t defend her step family.

ans I agree with pp for those saying “oh can she not go to parties some people are at then if she wants to?” No because she’s chosen to be the Queen consort.

wishingyouwell · 19/12/2022 08:31

Catherine Whelan's twitter account (Wall Street Journal) has been suspended after she said it was her theory that William's affair took place at the same time as they fed Harry and Megan to the wolves. Whelan's account has now been suspended. Is it not free speech for all then?

DriftwoodOnTheShore · 19/12/2022 08:34

jellyjellopeea · 18/12/2022 11:22

And that justifies this article being published in the national press?!

I didn't say that. I answered the question posed by the OP. Why pretend otherwise. Very odd behaviour.

IClaudine · 19/12/2022 08:43

I would like to see Buckingham Palace condemn Clarkson's disgusting remarks. If it doesn't, that will tell us a lot.

I can't believe the minimising on this thread.

ImaginaryDragon · 19/12/2022 08:53

Kingping · 19/12/2022 01:10

Whilst I could stoop to your level and snap back, that you’re the one using a serious matter to score cheap points and advance your thinly veiled agenda. Instead, I’m starting to find your posts, more specifically, their obsessive nature and charged emotive language, a little concerning. Being so emotionally invested, in a random celebrity couple, just isn’t very healthy. Can’t imagine such ‘dedication’ would impress Meghan and Harry. Especially in light of how Harry himself has (negatively) described obsessive fans in the past. Maybe take a leaf out of their book, find your freedom, and go live your own life in the real world. Instead of vicariously living through theirs. And your constant bullying of other posters with false accusations, isn’t even offensive. It’s actually quite sad. Must be exhausting to feel so triggered and persecuted all the time, seeing conspiracies everywhere. Hope you find some meaning and fulfilment in the near future to focus on instead. All this pseudo self righteous indignation is quite revealing. Hope you can get the help you quite clearly need, and soon. Im removing this thread from my watch list, so won’t see any more of your comments so please don’t waste your own time or raise your own blood pressure by continuing to vent your spleen at me. No point following me to hound me on other unrelated threads. It’s beyond tedious at this point 🥱 and easily solved with a simple NC x

My, my, smug to triggered, I hope it was a pleasant trip for you. My blood pressure is not raised thanks. Go ahead delete it from your watch list. You don't have to be a fan to call out vile rants like JC's, misogynistic, racist, or prejudiced behaviour directed predominanlty at M across all platforms. There are no saints or winners in this sorry mess, sorry if that is too balanced for you.

Lampzade · 19/12/2022 08:56

LimeCheesecake · 19/12/2022 08:26

But Morgan was at the party - he’s already said terrible things over and over and over about Camilla’s SDIL. By choosing to continue to socialise with people like him, it does get other shits like Clarkson and newspaper editors the impression Charles and Camilla don’t mind. It makes it very clear Camilla won’t defend her step family.

ans I agree with pp for those saying “oh can she not go to parties some people are at then if she wants to?” No because she’s chosen to be the Queen consort.

Camilla has also previously had a couple of cigarettes with Clarkson They are on friendly terms. He was comfortable writing that horrible, wicked article because he believed that it would be acceptable in the eyes of certain members of the RF
Noone should even attempt to defend him. His own daughter has criticised him ffs. Hats off to her
The right wing press claimed that the Royal Family have kept a dignified silence over the whole Netflix thing. Nonsense.
They are simply using others as their mouthpieces . Even Kate’s Uncle Gary had a dig at Meghan the other day accusing her of being jealous of his niece.
All this does is give credence to Harry and Meghan’s claim that members of the RF are in cahoots with some elements of the press.

Also agree that Camilla would have known who was going to attend that lunch. Trust me. She would have known that Piers Morgan , the man who has harassed and vilified her sdiil would attend that luncheon.
Yet people claim that Meghan and Harry are liars…..

I know many who have made a complaint against JC. I would urge others to do the same

RoseAndRose · 19/12/2022 08:56

IClaudine · 19/12/2022 08:43

I would like to see Buckingham Palace condemn Clarkson's disgusting remarks. If it doesn't, that will tell us a lot.

I can't believe the minimising on this thread.

It tells us only that they're not getting on the treadmill of having to comment on every story in future

bloodyplanes · 19/12/2022 08:59

As i pp Camilla and Charles know the "real" megan ( and harry) far better than any of us do! Maybe thats why they are not rushing to condemn this article or any other criticism of her?

Roussette · 19/12/2022 08:59

Also agree that Camilla would have known who was going to attend that lunch. Trust me. She would have known that Piers Morgan , the man who has harassed and vilified her sdiil would attend that luncheon.

Of course she would and that is my point. There is no way the Queen goes anywhere without security and her aides having previous knowledge of who will be there. For all sorts of reasons... embarrassment, awkwardness, being aware so that the right conversation can happen etc

It tells us only that they're not getting on the treadmill of having to comment on every story in future

It's rather more than that. Even the US press has picked up on it.
Not a good look.

Roussette · 19/12/2022 09:01

bloodyplanes · 19/12/2022 08:59

As i pp Camilla and Charles know the "real" megan ( and harry) far better than any of us do! Maybe thats why they are not rushing to condemn this article or any other criticism of her?

Ahhh... so they agree with it. Got you.

She should be paraded through the streets naked whilst the public shout 'shame' and chuck shit at her.

We're back to medieval Britain aren't we. Ducking stools next.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.