Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why do people feel it’s okay to say nasty things about Meghan on social media?

509 replies

Lilyyy · 08/12/2022 21:02

Why do people care so much about her and Harry’s relationship and are so intent on just being incredibly nasty about someone they don’t even know or really know the truth about? Harry must love her and be happy so why don’t the media and people on social media just let them be?

genuinely asking as I don’t understand why she gets so much hatred everywhere, must be really bloody hard for them to see it all the time. People act like she’s a murderer or something.

OP posts:
meinteresamucho · 12/12/2022 01:35

I get the impression it was in another league with Meghan to the extent that some staff have trauma from it. Sounds like Harry was involved too.

onlylarkin · 12/12/2022 03:21

There was a report that Charles once choked a staff member and ripped a sink out of a the wall. He worked his staff 7 days a week at all hours.

Andrew would throw stuff on the ground and demand his staff pick it up

(reportedly, I do not take the press at face value)

That didn't cause trauma? I would love for someone to tell me how Meghan could have caused more trauma then a man choking a staff member. (asking you rhetorically because no one really knows.)

Or maybe none of this bullshit is true?

meinteresamucho · 12/12/2022 04:10

I haven't heard those things but I don't doubt they could be true. Possibly they just paid the staff members off or apologised profusely and somehow mended the relationship. Or else they've just threatened them with legal clauses in their contract. In Meghan and Harry's case though the staff seem to have come forward and put their experience on the record and their chief of staff reported the allegations and the press got hold of it (or were made aware of it). So they're obliged to investigate now. If Charles has indeed done things like this in the past I can see why he'd be keen to kill the story about M&H. But even if he hasn't, he loves his son so would likely want to kill the story anyway. Sounds like the sussex staff want to speak out though but have signed contracts so can't. Maybe just like previous staff of previous generations.

onlylarkin · 12/12/2022 05:30

Or, maybe this bullshit just isn't true.

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 09:15

I always thought it was quite impressive that he could rip a sink off a wall, breaking the pipes and everything, with his bare hands.

antelopevalley · 12/12/2022 09:18

I am sure it is true that some members of the Royal Family treat their staff poorly. Almost absolute power breeds arrogance and terrible behaviour.

ShirleyPhallus · 12/12/2022 09:28

antelopevalley · 12/12/2022 09:18

I am sure it is true that some members of the Royal Family treat their staff poorly. Almost absolute power breeds arrogance and terrible behaviour.

I’m absolutely sure it is too, having worked only for some rich society types the arrogance and power is quite breath taking

I can’t believe that H&M caused “more trauma” as said by a PP up thread though, they were only there for five minutes!

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 09:31

I can’t believe that H&M caused “more trauma” as said by a PP up thread though, they were only there for five minutes!

They're sure making a lot out of those five minutes!

Lampzade · 12/12/2022 10:39

It is now a national sport to berate Harry and Meghan.
The funny thing is that all this attention ( whether negative or positive) ensures that they get attention and funding for their various charities,. It also ensures that they continue to live a great life with their two kids in California. So if the aim of their enemies is to destroy the couple , they are wasting their time
I am a firm believer in the idea that sometimes your detractors can be used to elevate you. This definitely seems to be the case for Harry and Meghan .
They are a lovely couple

Lampzade · 12/12/2022 10:49

meinteresamucho · 12/12/2022 04:10

I haven't heard those things but I don't doubt they could be true. Possibly they just paid the staff members off or apologised profusely and somehow mended the relationship. Or else they've just threatened them with legal clauses in their contract. In Meghan and Harry's case though the staff seem to have come forward and put their experience on the record and their chief of staff reported the allegations and the press got hold of it (or were made aware of it). So they're obliged to investigate now. If Charles has indeed done things like this in the past I can see why he'd be keen to kill the story about M&H. But even if he hasn't, he loves his son so would likely want to kill the story anyway. Sounds like the sussex staff want to speak out though but have signed contracts so can't. Maybe just like previous staff of previous generations.

I don’t know whether H and M actually bullied anyone .
All I would say is that Meghan worked on Suits for years, (where she was the main character) and has worked on other projects and there haven’t been any complaints about her behaviour. In fact, they said that she was lovely , supportive and respectful.
I find it difficult to believe that someone who has not behaved in such a manner suddenly turns into a mini tyrant .
However, if there is credible evidence that she bullied staff. She should be brought to book.
I doubt whether this is going to happen though, because there probably isn’t any credible evidence

lemmein · 12/12/2022 11:08

If my opinions aligned with Piers Morgan, Angela Levin, Sophie Corchrane, Katie Hopkins and the Dan Wootton's of this world I would seriously be reflecting on where that hatred for somebody I don't know had come from and maybe think about what had led me to share the views of the most hateful, vicious, bigoted people in this country.

I don't care that people don't like Meghan. I do care that yet another woman is being ripped apart and people won't be happy till this ends in tragedy (then they'll frantically delete their tweets and columns). I really care that 99% of the hate is blatantly parroted from the DM, that is concerning. The reach and influence of that hateful site is extraordinary, and makes me worry we'll be up for another term of the Tories because people seem unable to look beyond the headlines.

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 11:19

The funny thing is that all this attention ( whether negative or positive) ensures that they get attention and funding for their various charities,.

I'm glad charities will benefit. There can't be enough charitable giving in my opinion.

It also ensures that they continue to live a great life with their two kids in California. So if the aim of their enemies is to destroy the couple , they are wasting their time

Does anyone want to destroy them? I don't know that they do. They just want them to get on with their life and stop exposing other people's private lives - in the same way they didn't want theirs exposed. If they'd just gone to LA and done charitable work, we'd probably have forgotten about them in between awards. But, then, that's why they're chatting about granny, papa and big bro - because selling his relatives is what enables them to live a great life on California and gets them known sufficiently to be given an award.

lemmein · 12/12/2022 11:21

Does anyone want to destroy them? I don't know that they do. They just want them to get on with their life and stop exposing other people's private lives

If that was true then pre-Oprah everything would've been dandy...but, of course, it wasn't!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/12/2022 11:28

The funny thing is that all this attention ( whether negative or positive) ensures that they get attention and funding for their various charities

I'd like to think so, but can you point to where any money paid to H&M personally (Netflix, Random House, etc.) has been donated to charities?

I'm aware that Archewell's involved with various "partnerships" who appear to provide the funds, but not that the couple are known to be generous with their own money

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 11:34

lemmein · 12/12/2022 11:21

Does anyone want to destroy them? I don't know that they do. They just want them to get on with their life and stop exposing other people's private lives

If that was true then pre-Oprah everything would've been dandy...but, of course, it wasn't!

Clearly there was a bit of an outcry when they called the queen a liar but once they were in California, who talked about them? They staged some photos delivering food and then released the photos to the press. Other than that, when were they talked about? Well, maybe when they set up all the business and charities in the "off-shore tax" state of Delaware. But, then, that is quite newsworthy. But I never saw stories of them day to day.

kirinm · 12/12/2022 12:15

meinteresamucho · 12/12/2022 01:35

I get the impression it was in another league with Meghan to the extent that some staff have trauma from it. Sounds like Harry was involved too.

Of course it is. Meghan and Harry cause more trauma than anyone else could possibly cause because it suits the narrative. Who cares if it's actually true.

lemmein · 12/12/2022 12:29

Clearly there was a bit of an outcry when they called the queen a liar but once they were in California, who talked about them? They staged some photos delivering food and then released the photos to the press. Other than that, when were they talked about? Well, maybe when they set up all the business and charities in the "off-shore tax" state of Delaware. But, then, that is quite newsworthy. But I never saw stories of them day to day.

Are you kidding? Post-Oprah Piers Morgan was fired from GMB - before then he had spent every.single.day using his platform to attack MM (which according to him he received thanks for by a member of the RF) Every day there was stories and cries from the media to remove their titles, take away their security when they left. I don't really understand why you're pretending otherwise? Confused

Recollections may vary indeed! 🙄

whoamI00 · 12/12/2022 12:33

Have not used the social media before?

lemmein · 12/12/2022 12:34

And the only reference I can find that they called the queen a liar was by....you've guessed it, Piers Morgan.

In a teaser preview, Oprah asked how Meghanan felt about “the Palace hearing you speak your truth".
She replied: "I don't know how they could expect that after all of this time we would still just be silent if there is an active role that The Firm is playing in perpetuating falsehoods about us.”
Tweeting today, Piers insisted her reference to 'The Firm' in her "whine-athon" interview was a pointed remark aimed at the Queenen* and Prince Philip.
He wrote: "Let's be very clear: the new clip from Oprah's whine-athon with the Sussexes shows Meghan Marklele_ directly calling the Queen & Prince Philip liars.

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 14:58

lemmein · 12/12/2022 12:29

Clearly there was a bit of an outcry when they called the queen a liar but once they were in California, who talked about them? They staged some photos delivering food and then released the photos to the press. Other than that, when were they talked about? Well, maybe when they set up all the business and charities in the "off-shore tax" state of Delaware. But, then, that is quite newsworthy. But I never saw stories of them day to day.

Are you kidding? Post-Oprah Piers Morgan was fired from GMB - before then he had spent every.single.day using his platform to attack MM (which according to him he received thanks for by a member of the RF) Every day there was stories and cries from the media to remove their titles, take away their security when they left. I don't really understand why you're pretending otherwise? Confused

Recollections may vary indeed! 🙄

You seem very certain so maybe you're right. I dont watch breakfast news so I can't comment on Morgan but in 2020 both here and the US closed down. Harry and Meghan weren't out and about - other than they leaked photos of themselves and maybe he did a couple of zooms. I don't even know about that. All I remember about 2020 was covid, covid, covid. And not much about them.

But maybe you're right and I haven't remembered things correctly. I never thought I had anything in common with Harry but I guess I do. Lol.

As for your second post, again, I don't have twitter and I don't watch breakfast news,so I don't know what Morgan said. But Harry refuted that he hadn't told his grandmother and father things, I think he used the term 'blindsided', claims which came from the Queen and Charles themselves.

lemmein · 12/12/2022 15:03

But Harry refuted that he hadn't told his grandmother and father things, I think he used the term 'blindsided', claims which came from the Queen and Charles themselves.

So he didn't lie to the Queen then?

Tippexy · 12/12/2022 15:17

I don’t understand how her cheerleaders are able to deny JK’s email about bullying?

MarshaMelrose · 12/12/2022 15:25

lemmein · 12/12/2022 15:03

But Harry refuted that he hadn't told his grandmother and father things, I think he used the term 'blindsided', claims which came from the Queen and Charles themselves.

So he didn't lie to the Queen then?

As I said, called the Queen a liar.

I don't know if ever lied to the queen but on another occasion he did say after Lilibets birth that he had asked the Queen for permission to use her nickname and the Queen said he didn't.

lemmein · 12/12/2022 15:35

I dont watch breakfast news so I can't comment on Morgan

You don't need to watch breakfast news to hear about the drivel that man spouts - which you've clearly shown with your claim that H&M lied to the queen....which came directly from Morgan's mouth and was bullshit 🤷🏻‍♀️

Do you see how this works?

The Daily Mail is owned by one of Prince Charles' besties, pretty sure the ex-editor of the DM now works at KP? Then we have Angela Levin who rips H&M apart on a daily basis - but then is friends with Camilla and penned her biography, oh, and she also writes for the Daily Mail. Sophie Corcoran, another mouthpiece for the DM which spends her free time whipping up hate towards the couple and last but not least, Piers fucking Morgan.

Prince Charles was very close to Savile; interestingly Piers Morgan led the condolences when Savile died (yes, the ex editor of The Mirror knew nothing about Savile's crimes, apparently! 🙄) He claimed that he'd 'always loved Jimmy' and had met him at a function - he later denied knowing him at all. In addition Piers Morgan has been photographed with Ghislaine Maxwell - and we all know her connections to the Royals. All of these people are so closely connected it's almost incestuous!

H&M are used as a distraction for the plebs to bury other unsavoury royal news (PA) zero doubt about it and it is done with the RF consent, if not encouragement.

If you aren't joining the dots that there's a very orchestrated attack on H&M from Kensington Palace you haven't been paying attention - so yes, they have every right to bite back.

H&M might be complete arseholes for all I know, for me this isn't just about them - it's about the power of the Daily Mail and how those at the top manipulate public opinion in their favour and dumbarses just lap it up without applying any critical thinking at all.

They managed to keep PW's affair out of the press but seem completely helpless when it comes to protecting H&M, funny that 🙄

jeffgoldblum · 12/12/2022 15:43

Kitchen foil .

Swipe left for the next trending thread