Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Removing E:R from Harry’s Uniform

449 replies

Zoom101 · 18/09/2022 12:07

I am certainly not one of H&M’s fans but I think that for someone to actually remove the ER initials from his military uniform for the vigil was beyond petty.

The decision was made to allow him to wear a military uniform, fine, Andrew was also given permission but to take the time and trouble to remove the Queen’s initials from the epaulettes was, I think, really childish. I know he has chosen to not be a working Royal but the initals were left on Andrew’s epaulettes so why were Harry’s removed?

Apart from anything else, this will just add grist to the mill of H&M’s litany of complaints but for once, I think they’d be justified in being upset by this.

Expect I’ll be flamed for this and there are many more important things going on in the world but I do think this was a snotty thing to do to Harry.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Novella4 · 18/09/2022 14:26

@caringcarer

'The Queen took ADC from Harry but not Andrew'

This is the only thing of significance that you said . And it says it all .

caringcarer · 18/09/2022 14:26

Let's not forget Harry turned down an invitation from the Query to visit her for a sleepover at Balmoral with Meghan less than 2 weeks before her death. If you love someone you make time for them. They had a day off on their schedule but could not be bothered.

PicturesOfDogs · 18/09/2022 14:27

I might be missing something, but it was the queen who stripped him of his titles.
So technically Charles is going against her wishes by letting him wear the uniform.
Presumably because that’s his son and he loves him.

Doesn’t seem petty or spiteful at all, the opposite in fact.

greenhousegal · 18/09/2022 14:28

The RF is turning (has turned?) into a soap opera of manic proportions for the weary masses.

hewouldwouldnthe · 18/09/2022 14:29

Serenster · 18/09/2022 12:52

It’s neither petty nor spiteful, it was because they related to a role that he no longer has.

Harry was only entitled to the ER badges on his epaulettes because he was appointed a personal Aide de Camp to his grandmother. He was appointed to this position in October 2018 (so, if you see pictures of him in his uniform at the wedding, below, he didn’t have them then either).

After Harry left the Royal Family and ceased to hold his honorary positions, he also ceased to hold his role as ADC. His father granted him dispensation to wear his uniform for the vigil, but obviously he wasn’t reappointed to the ADC role (his grandmother being dead, she obviously couldn’t reappoint him…), so he didn’t have the badges on his epaulettes.

thank you for the explanation. However I'm sure the truth won't get in the way of a good story

Mummyoflittledragon · 18/09/2022 14:30

LAWinterofOurDiscountTents · 18/09/2022 13:57

He's entitled to wear whatever the fuck Daddy tells him to wear. That's how royalty works.

As far as I’m aware, King Charles has not granted him permission to wear the military uniform to the funeral, only for the vigil. I don’t understand this response.

Yesthatismychildsigh · 18/09/2022 14:31

It’s all absolutely pathetic.

antelopevalley · 18/09/2022 14:32

We all know the protocol explanation, but they change protocol when they want to.
It is petty and all about highlighting him as less favoured.
Andrew of course is still favoured.

CinnamonOrangeCremeBrulee · 18/09/2022 14:34

hewouldwouldnthe · 18/09/2022 14:29

thank you for the explanation. However I'm sure the truth won't get in the way of a good story

This is it isn't it ? Who knows if Harry even cares or if it just made up completely. The media just dont stop with it all. Of course then everyone comments with anecdote and personal opinion, and with reference to Palace Insiders etc. It's getting out of hand.

I'm far from a monarchist but of all times you'd think now would be a good time to give it a rest and for people to think critically before responding to the tripe that abounds.

antelopevalley · 18/09/2022 14:37

The rule for many though seems to be, call everything false news that is critical about the Royal Family unless it is Harry and Meghan. Then suddenly everything is true.
In reality the press did not even know that they were visiting the Queen in private a few months back until after they had been. They know nothing.

Glitteratitar · 18/09/2022 14:39

The stupidity of people on this thread who genuinely think Harry was been complaining to the Daily Mail about this.

Do you really hate H&M that much that you have lost all sense of logic?

JudgeJ · 18/09/2022 14:40

SilverLiningPlaybook · 18/09/2022 12:46

Agree with this. I also wonder who told the press.

Who told the Press? Answers on a postcard please. Whatever has or has not happened during the last 10 days it will be twisted and spat out once they're back in the States and there are those who will lap it up!

Changechangychange · 18/09/2022 14:45

TrashyPanda · 18/09/2022 13:21

This makes Harrylook spoilt, selfish and desperately immature.

I suspect that is the point, don’t you? The Daily Mail hate him and Meghan since she won the libel trial against them.

This “friend” almost certainly doesn’t exist (what actual friend of Meghan’s going to speak to the Mail?) It’s just the DM making stuff up, as usual, to sell papers/manufacture some controversy.

itsgettingweird · 18/09/2022 14:46

diddl · 18/09/2022 14:02

that that is why the Queen changed this status quo for when Charlotte was born

It still doesn't alter the fact that Charlotte is a "spare" though & that Charles, William & George will have the bond of being monarch.

Charlotte at least has Louis to bond with as the "spares" & the Middleton family who they all seem close to.

Agree in essence.

But it removed that status of the male line lining them up as important and not so important. If Harry had have had older sisters it would be interesting to see if he'd have still acted the same way. Or how they would have acted.

I feel for them all with this birth place putting them in a pecking order from the moment they are born.

I round it really interesting how during the jubilee it was Louis behaviour that was scrutinised. If the order hadn't been changed it would always have been Charlotte as the lowest one.

Plus the youngest two Cambridges (or are the Wales now?) still currently have their mother around and also each other.

From age 12 Harry was the spare in his family unit of 3. And I think that will have shaped some of the recent decisions he's made and his feelings he's felt the past decade or so as he's distanced himself.

I also suspect that his grandfathers death was a pivotal point in his feelings developing too.

Kedece2410 · 18/09/2022 14:47

Hes not entitled to wear the epsulettes or the uniform. He was able to wear a uniform he's no longer allowed to instead of him being happy with that, the main thing everyone sees, he still has to bloody complain.

KosherDill · 18/09/2022 14:47

Serenster · 18/09/2022 13:00

Also, on the Andrew v Harry differences: Andrew retired from the forces whereas Harry resigned. Under Army rules this does make a difference, it means Andrew is actually allowed to wear a uniform in certain circumstances whereas Harry is not. So Harry wearing a uniform at all was a genuine bending of the rules for him.

And Andrew remained an Honorary ADC to his mother at her choice - this is was reported on earlier this year, around the time of her Jubilee.

(I still think neither of them should have worn uniforms personally, but obviously no one thought to consult me. 😄 Once that decision had been made though, army rules are army rules. I note Harry should have shaved his beard off though, to comply with army uniform rules, but obviously did not. I assume his father also gave him a special dispensation for that, as he had a special dispensation from the Queen for his wedding. So he has had plenty of special treatment here).

Excellent points.

He seems to always want things both ways.

debbrianna · 18/09/2022 14:47

Riapia · 18/09/2022 14:03

Meghan should have put him some on with a felt tip, when she checked if he needed a wee before he went out.

Thank you. Horrible woman for not looking after the child she controls. What a narcissist traits I must say.

KosherDill · 18/09/2022 14:49

GobbolinoTheWitchesCat · 18/09/2022 13:11

It will be something to do with the fact that Harry resigned his position as personal aide but when Andrew was made a non working royal things were done differently.

You know, even in non enrolled families there is a recognised status difference between children and grandchildren...Its right that Andrew should be recognised as a son of his mother and therefore of greater familial relationship.

I really wish Harry would stop constantly whingeing. He has an immense personal fortune, the ability to earn every year an additional fortune out of reach of 99% of the world's population. He can walk into a highly paid, part time job on the basis on his name alone. He has never really had to work for anything in his entire life. He lives - and has always lived - a life of unimaginable luxury and by virtue of nothing but an accident of birth has an enormous global public profile that opens a huge number of doors for him.

He is so hugely out of touch, it's unreal.

Agree with this.

PicturesOfDogs · 18/09/2022 14:50

Changechangychange · 18/09/2022 14:45

I suspect that is the point, don’t you? The Daily Mail hate him and Meghan since she won the libel trial against them.

This “friend” almost certainly doesn’t exist (what actual friend of Meghan’s going to speak to the Mail?) It’s just the DM making stuff up, as usual, to sell papers/manufacture some controversy.

Equally some could say the point is to show how petty the RF are still being to Harry, even using his grandmothers funeral to stick the boot it.

I think whoever leaked it is an evil genius tbh.
Just enough it will cause tongues wagging, and yet not enough info, so each ‘side’ believes they are validated by it.

And both sides have fallen for it

itsgettingweird · 18/09/2022 14:50

PicturesOfDogs · 18/09/2022 14:27

I might be missing something, but it was the queen who stripped him of his titles.
So technically Charles is going against her wishes by letting him wear the uniform.
Presumably because that’s his son and he loves him.

Doesn’t seem petty or spiteful at all, the opposite in fact.

I do think Charles is starting to realise the impact of Harry being born second best and growing up in a household of heirs.

I think Charles looks more comfortable meeting and greeting than he does on official protocol so I'm hoping we'll see real change away from solely protocol and some emotion from the RF!

REP22 · 18/09/2022 14:54

@Zoom101 "ER" means Elizabeth Regina (Elizabeth Regina). She no longer does - the uniforms should all read CR. Maybe it's as simple as that they were the ones who realised and no CR equivalent insignia are available yet.

REP22 · 18/09/2022 14:55

REP22 · 18/09/2022 14:54

@Zoom101 "ER" means Elizabeth Regina (Elizabeth Regina). She no longer does - the uniforms should all read CR. Maybe it's as simple as that they were the ones who realised and no CR equivalent insignia are available yet.

*I meant (Elizabeth Reigns).

goodbyestranger · 18/09/2022 14:55

Sick of Harry trying to make everything about him

Sickened by Andrew being retained by mummy as her ADC, given what he's clearly done as Epstein's ADC.

BasiliskStare · 18/09/2022 14:56

Ach - I don't know but according to protocols , I reckon H&M have been given a lot of olive branches here - so my view would be - (whether they have or not ) - don't whinge.

I think HMTQ specifically asked that Andrew could wear that uniform once only & then he retires

Very hard when your mother's funeral is not only a family event but a national one.

When this is all over I hope H&M go back to the life they wanted and realise they were treated very respectfully by Harry's family and stop using the RF as their meal ticket & I do hope Andrew retreats into obscurity

diamondpony80 · 18/09/2022 14:58

Sounds like they were just following protocol, not snubbing Harry. It might seem petty, but military tend to follow rules to the letter.

Swipe left for the next trending thread