Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

More Of Meghan’s Archwell podcasts…

1000 replies

susan12345678 · 31/08/2022 20:51

Just to continue the discussion

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
SilverLiningPlaybook · 01/09/2022 16:06

Novella4 · 01/09/2022 16:01

Non@Serenster
The 'princes' had to walk to protect Charles from the public

It would have been enough for Charles Spencer to do the walk, maybe with his sisters. Charles was her ex husband and the boys should have been spared all that.

Serenster · 01/09/2022 16:07

This is what I’m a talking about. Prince Charles doesn’t appear to be facing any hostility from the crowd at all (quite the reverse). And this is what the people wanted…

susan12345678 · 01/09/2022 16:08

I always though Harry was great with people. Natural, open and genuine. He has a sense of humour and wicked fun

He always seemed so cheerful and relaxed in Kate's company

www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a27268978/kate-middleton-prince-harry-anzac-day-2019-photos/

OP posts:
DorritLittle · 01/09/2022 16:10

Yeah the British public were the really unreasonable ones when Diana died. I was 19 and found it all completely bizarre to be honest.

Novella4 · 01/09/2022 16:11

@Serenster his sons are with him..

BadgerB · 01/09/2022 16:11

Charles and Diana are said to have became "friends" of a sort before her death, Both had found some equilibrium and contentment since the divorce, and both keen on doing their best for the boys.
Diana especially seems to have been having a great time.

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:17

Farmageddon · 01/09/2022 11:33

Well exactly, and nobody would have even known about it if she hadn't specifically brought it up as an example of her greatness.

That's what is funny about the apologists on this thread, we are mostly discussing her own words, and the reason she is back in the press is because of her self promotion podcast. She orchestrated all this. Which is fine, but we are allowed to critique it or have opinions on it.

It’s really sad - if you read the whole paragraph that anecdote is in - it’s obvious that Meghan is aware of her meaning to most black British and the diaspora and

“Of course, she knows she’s no Mandela, but perhaps even telling me this story is a mode of defense, because if you are a symbol for all that is good and charitable, how can anybody find you objectionable, how can anybody hate you?”

Because it’s obvious no matter what she does and how hard she tries - people will always hate her. She needs to accept it because there will be no reasoning with people determined to see the worst in her at all times. Hopefully both her and Harry will find their niche and continue to be happy.

susan12345678 · 01/09/2022 16:18

Yeah the British public were the really unreasonable ones when Diana died. I was 19 and found it all completely bizarre to be honest

I was at Uni then, it seemed like a sort of mass hysteria, I found it very strange. I think the saturation coverage of Di & Dodi in the Med beforehand, and all the hand-wringing in the media about that, definitely contributed to the hysteria

OP posts:
HeddaGarbled · 01/09/2022 16:18

I feel like there’s something in this poll which goes some way to explain what has been discussed up-thread about these Mumsnet threads: U.K. women like Catherine (even more than the Queen) and don’t like Meghan. Even millennial women like Catherine more than they do Meghan.

Men don’t rate Catherine as highly, nor Meghan so low.

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:22

theveg · 01/09/2022 13:07

You’re absolutely right - systemic racism in the halls of power - be that legislative, the media or the judiciary is completely made up and I can’t believe that Meghan would even think to claim that she could have been the victim of this.

Come on!! It is inconceivable and utterly insulting to suggest that the press used the N word to describe her child and no one noticed cos "systemic racism".

No - read what she said again and then come back to what I wrote.

susan12345678 · 01/09/2022 16:22

Because it’s obvious no matter what she does and how hard she tries - people will always hate her. She needs to accept it because there will be no reasoning with people determined to see the worst in her at all times. Hopefully both her and Harry will find their niche and continue to be happy

Yes, there will always be some people who don't like us. But if we lead honest lives, treat others with respect, most people will reciprocate. That applies to all of us. Meghan isn't a special case, in that respect. What her fans and followers struggle to accept is the role Meghan's own lies and lack of humility have played in her own downfall.

OP posts:
skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:24

Farmageddon · 01/09/2022 13:10

Talk about deliberately missing the point. Systematic racism in the halls of power is certainly not the same as an overt newspaper headline, which is exactly what she was alluding to.

I’m not missing anything - read what she said again. Then ask yourself if she really said that someone said a slur in a newspaper headline or in print. Because she didn’t.

Blossomtoes · 01/09/2022 16:24

Novella4 · 01/09/2022 15:00

It's not 1950 .
I'm afraid dull will not cut it

Dull is absolutely fine. Life’s been way too exciting recently. I long for grey, boring dullness for a few years.

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:25

Festoonlights · 01/09/2022 13:23

I haven’t heard that word used in over thirty odd years. Thank goodness. It just isn’t true

I have both directed at me and others within the past 5 years

Blossomtoes · 01/09/2022 16:26

Novella4 · 01/09/2022 15:38

66 % for William you call that popular ?

Remind us what the Brexit vote was, and the proportion of the electorate who voted Tory in the last election. Any government would cry with disbelieving gratitude to get 66% of the vote.

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:28

Farmageddon · 01/09/2022 13:36

If that's the case, does she really expect us to believe that the UK is any more racist than the US?

As someone who has lived both places - yes. Racism in the US is in your face - racism in the UK is very insidious and subtle but still just as damaging.

Lineala · 01/09/2022 16:31

Serenster · 01/09/2022 15:59

The delay in visiting Aberfan is said to be the Queens own greatest regret, actually.

Diana’s death - it was of course spun as a mis-step at the time, but looking back now I think that situation plays very differently (I say this having watched the HBO film “The Princess” in the last couple fo days. It is really interesting - it replays the key events of her life from her engagement to Prince Charles to her death entirely by using archival footage from the news and video footage of the theme, plus a voice over from contemporaneous vox pops as well).

Anyway, when you see the Queen and Prince Phillip bringing back their grandsons to London by popular demand to be seen to be visibly mournful - it looks terrible. A 12 and 15 year old having to put on suits and go out to interact with the crowd outside the palace, and be sobbed over by strangers, just days after their mother has died is just bizarre - while the crowd claps them, and, ironically, shouts at their grandparents to “look after the boys”. The nation demanding performative grief from a family hit by tragedy has not aged well, I don’t think.

I agree absolutely about the queen bringing the boys back to London. They were at Balmoral and the plan was for them to remain there out of the public eye to mourn privately, but the Queen was very unpopular for her apparent lack of reaction to Diana's death and was advised to return to London by the PM. In hindsight (25 years later and knowing what we now know about Harry's mental health it was probably an error. But hindsight is a wonderful thing . . .

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:31

StopStartStop · 01/09/2022 14:23

I was thinking it was forty years...
That word just isn't used in the UK, unless there's some racist underground I don't know about (perfectly possible, I suppose). But even so, when a word is used at all, it creeps into more general conversation and the word she suggested never does. So, I think she's misremembered there, based on her lack of understanding of British society and social norms.

Please stop this. I have been called this and had others called this too (yes within the past 40 years). Stop it.

Novella4 · 01/09/2022 16:32

@Blossomtoes you and @susan12345678 are both misunderstanding the situation

Governments are elected .

Monarchies need a much higher level of 'support'than a government

skullbabe · 01/09/2022 16:34

SilverLiningPlaybook · 01/09/2022 15:14

‘Gets to call themselves black?’ What does that mean?

It means precisely that.
I’ll help with a starter question “What is the one drop rule and why did it come about?”

theveg · 01/09/2022 16:36

@skullbabe I am very sorry that you have been called that. I believe you as there are still unfortunately vile racists around. However, Meghan has specifically said that journalists on the royal rota have used it to describe her child, which is an outrageous and apparently unfounded accusation and people are rightly, asking to know who specifically has done this.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 01/09/2022 16:37

42 % postive for Charles and he's up next!
Things are going better than I thought

I hadn't realised his rating was that low on yougov, and it's not as if he's done anything really alarming recently - except the bags stuffed with cash of course, and I'm not sure very many would expect anything better since selling access to himself has been known for years

If this remains the case then the downside will be the PR drive which'll surround the coronation, but I'll keep faith in the ability to dig once the hoopla's over (and mummy isn't around to offend any more)

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 16:39

@skullbabe

i was wondering if you’ve had a chance to listen to Don Lemon’s comments on the podcasts on CNN ?

it was very interesting, and I thought it raised some interesting points.

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 16:40

@skullbabe

I’m sorry you’ve had racial abuse, there are some nasty ignorant people out there.

BadgerB · 01/09/2022 16:42

Novella4 ·
Monarchies need a much higher level of 'support' than a government

Quite the reverse, I would have said. The monarchy doesn't affect your day-to-day life, has been going for centuries, would be difficult to untangle constitutionally, and occasionally offer a fun occasion- wedding, jubilee etc.

A Government usually rouses at least half the population to anger - even some who voted for it

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.