Recent terrible pictures of Prince Harry

[Lockupyourbiscuits]

I’m not a big fan but it seems odd all the terrible pictures focusIng on Harry’s
1/ bald patch
2/ butt
and now horror of all horrors
3/ moobs !
im sure we all can have ghastly photos but nothing like this was released when he was in the royal family
Im actually feeling a bit sorry for him - seems a bit humiliating and I think they are a bit unnecessary ?

@lameasahorse ·
“And I am sure photos of plenty of celebrities exist of them being drunk, taking drugs, having an affair, etc that we will never see. The public only sees photos that someone releases.

I am sure there will be photos of some Royal Family members drunk for example that no one outside their trusted circle will ever see.
And I am sure photos of plenty of celebrities exist of them being drunk, taking drugs, having an affair, etc that we will never see. The public only sees photos that someone releases.

I am sure there will be photos of some Royal Family members drunk for example that no one outside their trusted circle will ever see.”

Fair enough.
However the photo the PP said was William is clearly not and they haven’t returned to clarify .

lameasahorse - Superinjunctions don’t mean no-one knows about the proceedings they relate to, they just mean that no-one in the UK can report on them, including the fact that the injunction exists. In all cases where they have been made, the Press in this country have known, and have had all sorts of fun and games in dropping hints that they know about them even if they can’t report on them. Certain actors and footballers suddenly being shoehorned into stories and described as “famously dedicated family man” and the like.

If the person who has taken out the superinjunction is famous enough, overseas papers will freely report on it, as the injunctions only have force in the UK. If there were incendiary pictures of William out there, as certain posters are desperate to believe, the press here would know about it, and the foreign press would know about it, and would publish them. They obviously haven’t, so you can work out for yourself what that means.

I can claim anyone on this thread has worn “blackface”. It would be a disgusting thing for me to do as being unable to prove something didn’t happen is a gift for trolls. Spreading malicious gossip to ruin someone’s reputation and supporting this gossip with “there could be photos, we’ll never know” is not evidence!

There is nothing wrong with shining a light on unpalatable behaviour but to just create an unpleasant rumour about someone or try to instigate speculation and to present as evidence a picture of a jockey in a grass skirt is a) pretty stupid but b) not actually defending your heroes! It’s sinking to the level of the trolls that criticise them.

whatever Harry’s attitudes now I saw a video of him saying paki and raghead. I have never seen a photograph of William doing the things this obsessed poster keeps saying he has. I have seen Trudeau in a photo with this. Just saying stuff to try to drive the spotlight away, doesn’t make it true.

However the photo the PP said was William is clearly not and they haven’t returned to clarify .

Quite.

I rarely post anything here and very rarely post anything serious, but that does seem very bad behaviour.

To me it seems obvious that it isn't William and does look very like Richard Gordon, (now that I've looked to see who that is).

This is how defamatory rumours start and gain credence.

I am not sure if the one of Harry is real either, it makes him look as if he has women's breasts rather than moobs.

But it is recognisably Harry.
Agreed it could have been altered to make the moobs more fulsome but nobody can reasonably deny it's him.

Of course it's real.

Harry and his wife are extremely litigious, especially when it comes to the British press. If it were a fake you can be certain they would sue.

The 'William' photo, however, is very clearly not William. Posting a photo purported to be him and giving no source so people can check the allegation for themselves is very bad form. Bordering on slander I should think.

It is Harry.

It is Harry but I think a combination of him leaning forward and adding shading or shadows on a grainy image could make his pecs look like moobs.

I suspect not many people here will remember a similar controversy about his mother, Lady Diana as she was then.
She was going to something grand with Prince Charles, not long after they were engaged, wearing a very low cut, strapless black evening gown.

The subsequent debate about what was in the picture; was it:

A) a bit of frill
B) a shadow cast by a frill
or
C) the Holy Grail: Diana's nipple

occupied the tabloids for days.

"Not the 9 O'Clock News" (ask your grandparents) even did a spoof on it, suggesting it was a shadow cast by a freak solar eclipse.

Nobody doubted that it was Diana though.
And nobody tried showing grainy pictures of a random, shorter, less blonde and totally topless woman saying that was her either. We weren't stupid enough, even then, to believe that.

The photos of his moobs has been photoshopped by the DM to make it look worse than in the tabloid that originally broke the story. There are other photos of Harry from his younger days topless in Las Vegas where he didn't have them but he was really young in those ones. He has a bit of a dad bod, Meghan does not have a good figure either which makes them evenly matched. They are not shockingly bad, they probably bear testimony to the American diet, who cares anyway?

@LaMarschallin Sarah, the “Duchess of Pork” was even worse, photos of her weight gain were splashed everywhere. I was a child and can’t remember the details, but I think it was when she was a new Mum so it was particularly unkind.

Cameleongirl

Yes, the D of P thing was very nasty and it must have been awful being always compared with the more classically good looking and slimmer (though for sad reasons) Diana.
At least - since they'll always be compared with each other, like it or not - it's a much more level playing field between Kate and Meghan.
Polo playing field, perhaps (trying to stay slightly on topic ).

Objectively, no, not at all.
But you are entitled to your opinion.
It could be worse, obviously.

And I suppose the same people will deny that William made an African theme party with blackfaces too.

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3009502.stm

What a load of old gossip with absolutely no evidence to back it up. You need to do much better than that

What I am seeing there is a picture of William who is always protected by the tabloids

Well you are on your own there 😂

@notanotheroneagain

It's clear as day that that is not William in the picture.

Can you link to your source so that we can all make up our own minds?

If that is not him, then it is not Harry with the moobs, nor him wearing a nazi uniform, but a ginger who looks like him. Why do you believe one and not the other.

That is really woeful logic. Because one picture is not who you claim it to be, then totally unrelated photos of the alleged subject's brother are also fakes?

You can do better than that. Can't you?