Harry and Meghan moving house allegedly

[Viviennemary]

Since this is being reported in thd DM and Daily Express perhaps it is on the cards. Seems quite soon to be moving though I don't blame them. Its quite a grotty and unappealing house and the gardens. All those bushes. Must cost a fortune to maintain. And not very child friendly either.

I said "I'd have to go into hiding," I'm well aware someone like Meghan would not find it embarrassing, we all have differing levels of empathy/remorse

Private Eye reported that Meghan offered to accept merely "'nominal damages' . . . the amount eventually settled on was £1"

They go on to criticise her as they think this conflicts with her statement that she wanted to "reshape a tabloid industry that conditions people to be cruel, and profits from the lies and pain that they cause"

I think settling for £1 in damages proves you are not suing for the money but for the principle, so I don't understand what Private Eye are in about.

It was all irrelevant and really did not feature as a major part of the case. You keep saying it's embarrassing, but that's your embarrassment. Don't lose sleep over it!

Empathy? She has lots of that. Remorse? She was vindicated because she won. It was irrelevant.

She never said day was night... exaggeration there!

www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/inside-meghan-and-harry-s-new-14-7m-nine-bed-16-bath-california-home-1.4329424

These are the photos from when it was listed.

How many properties have they lived in since they got together? 5 in as many years? I’m sure there will be many more.

@rubicscubicle

5% of profits is what they are required to pay, no one knows if they are doing that or not. So it is a non-story, till someone can prove that they are and that they are breaking any laws. This is just an assumption from trolls, not a story. So far no one has even logged a complain - I doubt anyone will, since the public does not pay a penny towards Archewell.

Tell me what other charities have been closed down MNHQ - are you talking about Susssex Royal by any chance? Strikes me you have been drinking Meghans kool aid

MNHQ (mums net head quarters) closed down a thread, not a charity on this subject. Strikes me you have been drinking something else, more than 'cool aid'.

Point being no other reason to register in Delaware other than for use of the 95 percent profit rule. Plenty of other states would gladly have taken their registration. Once a proper full year financials are available, this time next year, it will be interesting to observe their financials which is a well known scam for fleecing money ‘ donate to me, so I can donate on your behalf, whilst creaming offers the majority of profits’. You are right, once a full year in I am sure the us version of the charities commission will be ll over it. Take your point about bagahot park, that was a gift after all, but begs and Harry bought their footballers wifeesque mansion of their own volition, so it was all for grandeur

Apologies for typos on small phone with fat fingers. Hope the send is there

@rubicscubicle

The DM will be paying the legal costs. They will also pay undisclosed amount in damages. MM's lawyer also asked for the profits that the fail made from the story. There is no loss for DOS.

The 50K thing another distraction non story. A thread was zapped by MNHQ when it was pointed out that other royals have charities closed down and brought in even less money.

There is also no proof that they are bringing 5% to Archewell, which does not take funds from Joe public. It was started in Oct2020, fully operational from April 2021. Has made donations, there is no need for them to have more money.

Matter of opinion whether the DoS has lost. I, would be mortified to have lied in court, albeit I would never have tried especially when such evidence available to prove that I was nothing but a liar.

Glad Meghan won, after everything the DM and some of the UK press put her through. The dog whistles, bullying & daily articles articles attacking her then & even now, she deserved this win.

but begs and Harry bought their footballers wifeesque mansion of their own volition, so it was all for grandeur

'begs' lol
Up to them what they bought surely?

Are you having a go at the Rooneys for building a £20million mansion that's been likened to a Morrisons supermarket!?
No.

M&H can buy what they want where they want, we don't pay for them.

So peculiar to get worked up about this.

Matter of opinion whether the DoS has lost. I, would be mortified to have lied in court, albeit I would never have tried especially when such evidence available to prove that I was nothing but a liar

Well... the case was about privacy and copyright so unless the MoS publish one of your private letters, you aren't going to be in the position of being 'mortified' are you...

Glad Meghan won, after everything the DM and some of the UK press put her through. The dog whistles, bullying & daily articles articles attacking her then & even now, she deserved this win

Ditto. Well deserved

MM's manager who registered the company in Delaware has always done that. He did it for her Tig years before and does it for al his clients. Nothing new there.
The US charity authorities do not have to wait for next year if there are any irregularities. There have been none.

Who are you referring to that they take money from since the public dose not donate to Archewell.

Gift or not, we pay for Bagshot. We do not pay for Montecito - they can go as big or small as they want.

They will not be any more mortified or go into hiding, any more that the Queen forgetting during the Paul Burrell case - don't even remember her being called a liar while dealing with authorities.

@Roussette

Glad Meghan won, after everything the DM and some of the UK press put her through. The dog whistles, bullying & daily articles articles attacking her then & even now, she deserved this win

Ditto. Well deserved

Apologies did you fail every English comprehension test ever taken in class? the point I was making was Bagshot park was gifted, therefore no choice, Megs and Harry chose and bought their hideous mc Mansion. Lawyers give advice it is up to you whether to take it and the optics of a Delaware based company for a charity are poor. And yes, I would be mortified to be caught lying in court especially so blatantly. If damages for £1 were given re the privacy action, that is a pyrrhic victory. Copyright was another strand to the case. Legal costs are $2m and not 100% paid by DoM. That is very interesting as normally losers pay 100% unless overinflated costs provided by the other party.

@ChiefInspectorParker

I sensed quite a bit of embarrassment in the Mail’s coverage of the settlement today.

I do think that most people would be hugely embarrassed and ashamed to have to admit in court to such a severe lapse of memory (in other words, lying to the court). However most people probably wouldn’t have the chutzpah to do so in the first place.

it seems it might be a bit of a Pyrrhic victory for MM overall.

I doubt DM are embarrassed they have made a fortune out of this case with advertising and Mail on Line. Begs may get some of it, but the detriment to her reputation makes the "win" a hollow one.

I doubt DM are embarrassed they have made a fortune out of this case with advertising and Mail on Line. Begs may get some of it, but the detriment to her reputation makes the "win" a hollow one.

Yes they made a lot of money and Meghan is getting it, that is what account of the profits means.

@rubicscubicle

I doubt DM are embarrassed they have made a fortune out of this case with advertising and Mail on Line. Begs may get some of it, but the detriment to her reputation makes the "win" a hollow one.

Yes they made a lot of money and Meghan is getting it, that is what account of the profits means.

Indeed, a non disclosed percentage of money and a ruined reputation. Well done Meg. Guess for you the financial value of the ‘win’ is a measurement of success

@peeweemermaid

I have no idea why you have directed your last post to me. And no idea why you have to be so rude.
I have no idea what your post of 10.37 is on about.

By the way her name is Meghan not 'Begs' which is just a pathetic insult showing you up. I apologise in advance if your M key is just sticky and your finger slipped.

ChiefInspector OK you are saying Meghan has lost the case. Weird, as everyone else including MSM seems to think she won the case?
Not spinning anything, just pointing out facts. All the clicks online and profit from the story with AP will be paid to her. That seems like a 'win', don't you think?

I'm amazed that the posters on here who are fixated in their dislike of her can't even accept she won the case! Bizarre.

And how wonderful she is donating the costs to charity. An even better win.

Indeed, a non disclosed percentage of money and a ruined reputation

What ruined reputation? I've seen nothing online saying that apart from the bots, trolls and hate accounts set up to deliberately slur her. (Check out Christopher Bouzy on Twitter, that's an eye opener)

They are pretty popular over in the US, they are liked, and I am on Twitter following a lot of people and have seen nothing about a ruined reputation.
Maybe it's just in your eyes?

@Roussette

And how wonderful she is donating the costs to charity. An even better win.

That was a typo and if you review y prior comments I apologised for fat fingers - i call her Meg which is a short form fo Meghan . The reason I was rude is you deliberately misread/ misrepresented my comments showing a clear lack of literary comprehension. To be frank you are factually wrong in your representation that Meghan will get all of the profits, firstly she has been granted part profits and secondly they will be calculated based on the clicks on that story alone and the advertising attached to it. Given the amount of subsequent press stories and articles over the case the only financial winner will be the MOS and in the meantime Megs will have tarnished her reputation even further. Of course, it always depends on how you define 'win'

@Roussette

Indeed, a non disclosed percentage of money and a ruined reputation

What ruined reputation? I've seen nothing online saying that apart from the bots, trolls and hate accounts set up to deliberately slur her. (Check out Christopher Bouzy on Twitter, that's an eye opener)

They are pretty popular over in the US, they are liked, and I am on Twitter following a lot of people and have seen nothing about a ruined reputation.
Maybe it's just in your eyes?

Are you in the US - clearly you have no regard the rest of the world's opinion and her reputation in the UK, Australia, Japan and France. Of course, if you are American you are unlikely to give a fig about the rest of the worlds opinions. BTW Bouzy is being called out for the idiot he clearly is. - perhaps you should reach outside the Echo Chamber of twitter to inform yourself?

The reason I was rude is you deliberately misread/ misrepresented my comments showing a clear lack of literary comprehension

I honestly think you are muddling me up with someone else. My post you linked to at 10.37 has no bearing on your reply.

This was posted by someone.... "Glad Meghan won, after everything the DM and some of the UK press put her through. The dog whistles, bullying & daily articles articles attacking her then & even now, she deserved this win"
All I replied was 'ditto. Well deserved"

You then insult me and ask if I am lacking in comprehension skills. And now again have said I misrepresented you and 'show a clear lack of literary comprehension'.

I have no idea what you are on about

Stop being so rude

Oh... and a win is ummmm a win. I define it as that. To be successful in a conflict. A win.
Why would the AP be forced to post an apology on the front page of DM if it was a loss?

@peeweemermaid

You obviously can only put your opinion across by insulting posters who don't agree with you. And insulting other countries such as the US.

I shall leave it there, it's best if I don't respond to you as I refuse to start trading insults, that's your thing, not mine.

Have yourself a good day.