So I can see why H&M would first ask the palace before anyone. For years they have been having confidential therapists who never leaked on Charles, or W or H or anyone really.
The hell is so difficult for the palace to do this anyway, other than malice.
Yes, what possible motive could the palace have for denying Meghan immediate mental health care? Bearing in mind she was rightly able to choose her own team for pregnancy care (which I thought included her preferred US doctors). The only motive would have to be pure malice / cruelty. Which sounds extremely far fetched, certainly in the context of everything else, which is why so many people just don’t believe this is what really happened.
What would H&M have to gain by making out the palace were mean? Quite a lot actually. On a global scale.
But now this week it’s been proven that Meghan is capable of misleading under oath in a court of law (whether intentional or not) and Harry was also proven to be ok with intentionally mislead the public re Finding Freedom. Also not forgetting Meghan was also happy to manipulate the public by ‘pulling on heartstrings’ with ‘dear Daddy’ if her letter was ever made public. this makes it even more likely that their version of events, on any claim they make, can not be reliable. If they had any credibility before, I don’t know how anyone can argue they still do.
So I’m not sure how you can keep insisting everything they say is as good as fact. They are misleading people. They are not the saints you seem to want to portray.
As to why the palace haven’t ‘leaked’ an opposing story, this was one of a number attacks made on the royal family by them. If we are to believe reports, Charles wanted to issue a point by point rebuttal and no doubt he had something to say about this. However the Queen had final stay and we got the recollections may vary statement.