@ohforarainyday
The point is that in order to receive a living as a Royal there is an expectation that you will work within the system for the British public.
That clearly isn't accurate. Plenty of non-working royals either receive public money (eg the York Princesses having state-funded security until well into adulthood) and/or live in royal properties for a peppercorn rent. Plenty of so-called "working royals" barely work yet are given access to a multi-millionaire lifestyle for doing the equivalent of barely one day a week, or for counting attending movie premieres, Wimbledon finals, or close family events as "work."
Charles paid for them for six months or so , after that they were expected to self fund.
Then how come they had to rely on Tyler Perry when they first left? Anyway they did go out and work and landed a £70 million Netflix deal just months after leaving.
Harry obviously expected his father to pay for security for the rest of their lives! This had obviously not been agreed at all.
Disagree, that's purely your opinion and is not backed up with any facts. Harry's comments about security related to Archie's birth and before Archie's birth, when they were both still working royals. I see zero evidence they expected to be supported in the long run.
Besides, how was anything supposed to be "agreed" when the Cambridge household leaked the news about the exit to the press prematurely, and Charles refused to speak to his son?
As far as I am aware, the York sisters do not receive security paid for by the Queen and never have had as adults. As the grandchildren of the Queen and the children of a working Royal at the time, they did receive security as children. They aren't working Royals, they have ordinary jobs, so don't receive money from the Royal purse.
Other non working Royals get houses at a pepper corn rent, but do not receive money from the Civil List. In fact the whole issue of grace and favour houses came under scrutiny when one of the Queen's cousins was shown to be paying far too little, so the rent was increased.
I have no idea why they chose Tyler Perry's house, but it seems to have been because he offered them his security, presumably for free , or cheaply. They only moved to that house after they had lived in Canada , again in a free house we assume. They lived in Canada for six months or so if I remember rightly, and their security was provided by the Canadian govt and Met officers. The latter were paid for by Charles I assume, though why the Metropolitan Police are able to cover security for foreign Royals in another country is beyond me. It must have cost an absolute fortune, as they were doing three weeks on, three weeks off, and being flown home each time, according to reports. The Metropolitan Police are supposed to protect the public, not members of the Royal family who have decided to jump ship and live in another country.
Harry seems to have a particular axe to grind about the fact that his father pulled the funding for his 'securidee'. It's all there in the interview. Why was he moaning about funding having been stopped if he wasn't expecting it to be paid for on a never ending basis? It doesn't make sense. So it's not my opinion, its the words from his own mouth if you bother to listen properly.
There is absolutely no factual evidence that the Cambridge household leaked the news that H and M were moving abroad! This was done by themselves because they knew the Press had got hold of the information. Through leaked emails supposedly. No evidence the Cambridges even knew of their plans.