Positive thread on Meghan again

[Mummy194]

Now that at the other knock off MN chat has been shut down, we seem to have an influx of those posters on here with new or encouraged accounts.

For those who are not interested in trawling through negative post after the other. You can come on here for positive news about Meghan and Harry.

Why not, everyone else seems to be viewed positively, without 'cynicism'. I don't mind taking this at snail pace, we just post on the good things about H&M, they sure seem to be doing a lot of that lately, and it's really buried under the negativity on MN.

@Roussette

Andrew has told his truth and nobody believes him so why should one person’s truth be more reliable than another person’s truth?

You are comparing a peron who carried on a friendship with sex offender/paedophile after he was convicted and then went on record with Maitlis saying he did not regret the friendship.... with someone who was asked a question and spoke from the heart about how she was feeling.

How on earth can you compare the two?

There is no Andrew's 'truth' to discuss. I've written facts.

I can compare them because they are both people, in the same family, who have stated their version of events as the truth and expect people to believe them despite plenty of evidence to the contrary of some of their truths. They are very easy to compare. That’s what happens when you are caught out lying; you become comparable to another publicly caught out liar and cannot be trusted.

If Meghan was some sort of perpetual victim type (and I agree, there are a few of those around), surely this would be a pattern in her life pre-Harry? Everything I've read/seen shows her as a happy and confident person juggling various projects and causes and being well liked by others.

Andrew has told his truth and nobody believes him so why should one person’s truth be more reliable than another person’s truth? Both of them have been proven to have lied whilst telling their truth.

So now we are going to compare MM with Andrew. Are you effing serious !

Not only has A been identified by witnesses, we have a proper victim who has sacrificed her face and identity, but also has matching timelines, accusing him. Yet you think this peado/traffic person violator is the same as MM.

Sorry, but you ARE deranged !

@SunbathingDragon No, Meghan has not been caught lying about anything. Andrew has, however.

But what 'version' of events for Andrew is there? He can't deny the friendship. He can't deny he didn't go to Epstein's NY residence and island. This is fact. There is footage. He can only justify it in some odd way. Which, as we know, didn't work.
After his carcrash interview there was a massive outcry.

And yet you compare to Meghan.... Is it the wedding statement 3 days before thing? Or what. Why is she not to be trusted? Is this just you twisting the words she said and are you saying you think when she answered the Tom Bradby question she was lying or something. I do hope not.

You carry on lumping them together if that's your thing. I find that appalling but it's a free world.

@Mummy194

Andrew has told his truth and nobody believes him so why should one person’s truth be more reliable than another person’s truth? Both of them have been proven to have lied whilst telling their truth.

So now we are going to compare MM with Andrew. Are you effing serious !

Not only has A been identified by witnesses, we have a proper victim who has sacrificed her face and identity, but also has matching timelines, accusing him. Yet you think this peado/traffic person violator is the same as MM.

Sorry, but you ARE deranged !

There is no lowest level some of these Meghan haters will stoop to. Just when you think the lowest level has been reached, they prove us wrong. There is no rock bottom.

@Roussette

So she shouldn't speak her truth?

Her truth? Or The truth?

@Aspiringmatriarch

If Meghan was some sort of perpetual victim type (and I agree, there are a few of those around), surely this would be a pattern in her life pre-Harry? Everything I've read/seen shows her as a happy and confident person juggling various projects and causes and being well liked by others.

Good point!

@StormzyinaTCup

Viviennemary Another here in agreement.

There is a recent news article about his £5Million legal case that is ongoing

I also read an article today listing the patronages he has lost since his link with Epstein, I think he had 51 and is now down to 4 and I expect these will disappear shortly too.

The palace did nothing regarding Andrew's patronages initially. I remember one of them told us they were dropping him, nothing about the palace is withdrawing him or anything.

This is news, just came up now because people have been questing a bit too much why H is getting stripped of everything and not him.

Infact a just a month ago, some bushy tailed publication reminded everyone that Andrew still has a lot of his patronages.

uk.news.yahoo.com/prince-andrew-patron-charities-stepped-back-173928388.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEkshJSVnx4uFGwYR3TtCX1cpRQJ4L47-7srlQJrmoKw05QrFaA94OpKp7M4_0cQ1USEDdUz2TB8ho9n7T1I3QAPfbEn19aRQ9EE5A0tyqt_USxwT2kgKuDgjisL1fJN4w4tqaKsCUYQ3r1Yr-wpbC6643mZcf-4sJME36KMQiTi

There is no lowest level some of these Meghan haters will stoop to. Just when you think the lowest level has been reached, they prove us wrong. There is no rock bottom

Agree. There's been some stuff written on this thread that I'm pretty shocked about to be honest.

But it has proved to me what I suspected. The massive and overpowering dislike of a woman by some posters overrides any sensibilities and the Agenda is to criticise her for anything that can be dug up, twisted and spread. And I presume that makes them happy.

I will stop writing more of what I think because the post will probably be deleted.

Just noticed this thread. Going to go back and have a proper reread but how refreshing.

Thanks OP.

Infact a just a month ago, some bushy tailed publication reminded everyone that Andrew still has a lot of his patronages.

Bushy tailed publication

I think the reason there is not much traffic on the Andrew threads is because everyone has the same opinion - revolting sleaze, should be in court (of law) etc - so there isn't much to discuss.

There are lots of differing opinions on Meghan and Harry.

Yes BalloonSlayer there is little to discuss if nearly everyone is on the same page.

I think the reason there is not much traffic on the Andrew threads is because everyone has the same opinion - revolting sleaze, should be in court (of law) etc

I agree. But on this thread Meghan is put in the same category as him

I thought Meghan was caught out about two points in the interview. One- that she was married three days before by the Archbishop. Who then said this wasn't true. Two- when she said Archie wasn't given a title due to the colour of his skin but it turns out he was never going to be given a title, the rule had changed beforehand. She did twist things to suit her own narrative so I guess you could wonder how close her truth matched the real truth. It makes her look untrustworthy. I suspect there's her truth, the RFs truth and the real truth in between.

I don’t think these are untruths.

I had a legal and a personal wedding. When people ask me about my wedding anniversary I refer to my non-legal wedding , as in my mind that’s the more meaningful one. How is that an untruth? It is just a preference 🤷‍♀️

And “caught out”, like really?

Well... the whole modus operandi of some is to 'catch her out'. Then they can write post after post about how awful she is because of whatever...

agree @Roussette. It is batshit...😂.

@Gorgeouslilgirl

I don’t think these are untruths.

I had a legal and a personal wedding. When people ask me about my wedding anniversary I refer to my non-legal wedding , as in my mind that’s the more meaningful one. How is that an untruth? It is just a preference 🤷‍♀️

Because she actively said they were actually married three days before and the public marriage was a spectacle. I wasn't trying to catch her out at all. I took what she said at face value, it's only what I read about afterwards. But when people are defending her and someone points out a situation where she has been shown to be untrustworthy for whatever reason it's not a determination to catch her out. She caught herself out by saying two things that were later shown to be untruths. Love her or not that's a fact. Its like no one is allowed to say anything remotely negative about her as they are mean, nasty, trying to catch her out and a MM hater. I am none of the those things.

It is an untruth to claim the Archbishop of Canterbury married you when he did not. Furthermore the "untruth," or lie as it should be called, claimed that Justin Welby had not only conducted an illegal marriage, he had then conducted a fake one (the televised one in the Chapel).

The Archbishop was forced to issue a statement to say he had not married them - this is because it was such a serious issue if he had done so. And that's why them saying that was so insulting to him.

Marriage is one of the holy sacraments of the church, it's not just a legal ceremony. Doing it properly according to the laws of the land and the laws of God are taken incredibly seriously by any clergyman. Alleging a priest flouted these rules is an absolutely appalling thing to do.

It's not trying to "catch someone out." It's "calling someone out" about a dreadful lie.

If it hadn't been the Archbishop of Canterbury, but a newly qualified curate they had claimed that about, they priest in question might very well have lost their job.

Ps - I have never said she's awful, I have actually said I don't like or dislike her. I have said I sympathise with her over her treatment by the press and that she had to end contract with her father. But I have also answered questions people have asked about why there is so much dislike of her. Any disagreement doesn't make people a Meghan hater when they are only pointing out things that she has done which didn't paint the best picture of herself.