the post last week was little more complex than that. My point was that none of us know anyone's motivations of why they post what they post. Stating the obvious.
Agent provocateur may post an offensive term because they want to accuse MN of being racist. Don't think that's a difficult concept to understand.
I said I haven't seen anyone use the N word on MN, but it would be impossible to know if someone did use it on MN, whether they were genuinely a racist or someone posing as a racist to enable them to quote over and over again that they've seen use of the N word on M. I haven't seen it, but you regularly claim you see use of N word all over MN.
I see all you can take from my post is that somehow means that I support someone using the N word and also doesn't mean they're racist ... hmmmm I make no excuses for anyone using the N word.
You do make excuses for people using the P word though (Harry). I think , on balance it may be you that is happy to support racist terminology as being of no consequence.
The only person have EVER seen using the N word and quoting regular use of the N word - is you rainy.
I don't know what your motivations are, same as no-one knows what anyone's genuine motivations are on here.
None of that means I defend someone using the N word as not being racist.....