Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Does anyone want a thread for people who are happy for Harry and Meghan? Thread 3

999 replies

Samcro · 01/03/2020 20:51

new thread hope Dave comes back

OP posts:
Thread gallery
74
LaurieMarlow · 10/03/2020 10:02

Great read, thanks for posting Mummy

Fame paid for with flagellation is a great phrase.

Cerseirys · 10/03/2020 10:07

Chris Allerton? He took the photos on their IG but not the now-famous umbrella photo. That was Samir Hussein.

Mummy195 · 10/03/2020 10:17

I did not realise he was "MM's photographer". I thought he was chosen to take a few pics like the christening etc. because he is one of those discreet respectful ones who would not pap and sell to DM without permission.

EnriqueTheRingBearingLizard · 10/03/2020 10:23

@Rainbows8117
Does that mean the raindrops were photoshopped then enrique? I've just looked and you're right, can't see any rain, just wet pavement!

I really wouldn't know, it could have been 'enhanced' it could just have been other lighting in the area giving a one in a million shot. When you see famous people on public display like that the barrage of camera flashes is something else.

I'm sad that Meghan's relationship with the working royal family has come to this, especially after the early sentiments. I say Meghan as she's been involved for such a short time and she seemed so enthusiastic at first. But the reality is we don't know the dynamics within their marriage, who's driven this decision and we don't know the internal dynamics of the family and wider family. Not for real.

I feel sad at their leaving as I think they could've done some amazing and high profile work and been a fantastic part of the core royal family going forward, especially in the future when Charles is a more elderly King. I think the Commonwealth role was fantastic for them and for the Commonwealth and it's a shame Meghan's symbolic wedding veil was not destined to signify their working lives going forward.

Overall though, who wouldn't want people to be happy rather than sad?

Rainbows8117 · 10/03/2020 10:38

mummy if you click on the picture then it will give further details of the photographer etc.

Does anyone want a thread for people who are happy for Harry and Meghan? Thread  3
Rainbows8117 · 10/03/2020 10:43

I'm sure it's just an unfortunate bad photo hence no other ones in the sequence. I'm quite critical of H&M but I wouldn't use this single photo to bash them with. But I also take smiley staged photos with a pinch of salt too. They don't really tell us anything about what's really going on, good or bad.

TheMustressMhor · 10/03/2020 10:52

I'm sad that Meghan's relationship with the working royal family has come to this, especially after the early sentiments. I say Meghan as she's been involved for such a short time and she seemed so enthusiastic at first. But the reality is we don't know the dynamics within their marriage, who's driven this decision and we don't know the internal dynamics of the family and wider family. Not for real

I agree entirely with this and I was very glad for PH when he got engaged to MM.

I also think she didn't give it enough time. She had so much to give and could have made such a big contribution.

But it's true to say that nobody knows what is really going on in a marriage, except the participants. We can speculate all we like but we do not know the reality of people's daily lives.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 10/03/2020 11:54

well if Blair and Cameron (and other ex PM's) get (their security) paid, I don't see the problem. cameron chose to be a PM, Harry had no choice about being born onto the RF

It's true that PMs put themselves up for election, but since it's others who actually do the electing I'd suggest that creates an obligation for us to pay for the situation we've created

Because we get no such choice with the RF, and because they lack the power of MPs to make overall decisions which some will naturally object to, I believe the situation's rather different

Mummy195 · 10/03/2020 12:14

The rags are probably tearing their hair out now. They have no idea if Meghan has left for Canada or not. They did not see her arrive, no idea if she came by private or commercial flight, how or when exactly. No idea who baby Archie is with - wether Doria or Jessica. They know nothing.

Reminds me of the time H&M took the 6 week break and disappeared. The press had no clue where they were or with whom. I remember later, when Piers M pretended that ' but we left them alone on holiday'. No you did not, you had no clue. I guess Dan Wootton 'source' was not told anything.

Just saw Dan on the telly right now stating it like fact that H&M were paid a million for JP Morgan. When it's already been reported that no one knows for sure - once more no pics of them there. It is rather unlikely that they will receive payments till the 1 April.

I wonder when the BM will stop with acting like the abusive jilted lover. Have they not had enough of lying.

BM also keeps stating that they are going to Hollywood like that is fact, when H&M never said any such thing. They just seem scared that H&M will be this runaway success, and they will be left with egg on their faces, so they try to thwart every avenue. They've been going around TV stations in US and Australia, rubbish talking H&M - especially M. One woman even called her 5clicks from trailer trash, well she got backlash from Americans for that.

Lots of talk about MM going to acting again. Them selling merch and other nick knacks, but I do believe they will likely take the Obamas, Gates, Buffet route, though they would have to make money first. They probably will be paid handsomely for talks, and I don't discount a book - though I doubt it will include the Windsors, but will likely talk about the projects they did and probably reveal the media lies.

All the best to them

Roussette · 10/03/2020 13:33

I'm having a funny five minutes here, who is BM?

Mummy195 · 10/03/2020 13:35

British Media, did not want to say BP (press) because it would sound like Buckingham Palace.

Samcro · 10/03/2020 15:52

i saw the pics today(a man was reading a paper just in front of me.)
they all looked really nice. I wish i scrubbed up that well.

OP posts:
Roussette · 10/03/2020 15:52

Ahhhh thanks! I would've thought BP meant Buck House, so yes!

TheMustressMhor · 10/03/2020 15:57

I wondered who BM was too.

Samcro · 10/03/2020 16:07

i thought it was P morgan and a miss type

OP posts:
Mummy195 · 11/03/2020 09:27

Looks like this meeting was on Monday or Tuesday?, guess they tried to squeeze in as much as possible.

www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=jK9x4FenA1E&feature=emb_logo

Roussette · 11/03/2020 09:41

Great clip, thanks Mummy

Mummy195 · 12/03/2020 10:58

The DM group is shady af.

So obviously, the 'hoax' story is put up to shut down the real news, which is that Harry won one of his hacking cases yesterday. That is buried in the ether, so everyone had to run with this rather questionable 'hoax' story, to push the narrative that Harry will not be safe outside the bosom of the RF, you know, like when DM sent paps for hire to stalk MM, and pretend she was looking at the camera, just to prove that the world will pap them now (instead of the DM ruining them with pen and paper). Though it looks like H&M, with the help of locals, were on top of shutting that down.

When was this recording supposedly made? New Year's eve? January? When no one knew where they were. They did and still do have the Sussex Royal team who made sure to cover all grounds and not leak their whereabouts, but somehow this call came through right in the middle of their holiday, after much vetting. The house is speculated to be owned by a Russian millionaire - who denied that. So the recording had to come from some dodgy Russians too. But the same Harry who is suing for phone hacks, is talking rather freely on the phone with a stranger - a collection of what we already know, so it doesn't all sound too outlandish. To add gravitas, HMQ and PM were also 'pranked' in the past.

I never read much of the other articles, but we are also supposed to believe that MM friends are talking to the same press that H&M are suing. Despite the fact that last time, friends supposedly talked the story was twisted that MM sent them, then Serena W saying something about her coming to watch a match had the same effect, so now it looks like friends have decided to keep shmum incase it all gets twisted.

The timing of everything kind of reminds me of the Disney narrative. They went to Disney in the summer and did the 'pitch' (though some say it was all fake dubbed) for voice over, to raise funds for the elephant charity. So the press sat on this video the whole time, only to release it when they go out so to make it like they were pitching to make money for themselves.

I'm expecting a whole flurry of videos, audios and lies till the 31st. I wonder if the Sussexes will be able to defend themselves from the 1 April when they are out of the 'no comment' zone. Though I imagine, they will ignore some.

Does anyone want a thread for people who are happy for Harry and Meghan? Thread  3
Does anyone want a thread for people who are happy for Harry and Meghan? Thread  3
Mummy195 · 12/03/2020 11:01

I don't know if the laws have already been passed to identify the owners of the Vancouver property yet.

www.tatler.com/article/harry-and-meghan-vancouver-retreat-owner

Does anyone want a thread for people who are happy for Harry and Meghan? Thread  3
Mummy195 · 12/03/2020 11:12

Victoria Mathers is dripping with spite. Representing the British Press/ Media in their smear campaign overseas. You can almost see the presentor's mouth drop before she cut her off quickly. Full coverage here.

www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-guest-sparks-outrage-after-calling-meghan-markle-five-clicks-up-from-trailer-trash/

Some of the reactions. See the view video further down (not the trump video)
www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/stupid-woman-joy-behar-calls-msnbc-guest-trailer-trash-for-criticism-of-meghan-markle

Vanity Fair quickly washed it's hands off her, saying only did an article for them back in 2018. And MSNBC will never invite her back again. Do these reporters actually think they are doing UK any favours, making us appear like some racist country and HMQ as petty?

Samcro · 12/03/2020 11:16

the hoax thing is vile. and I find the release of it very suspect. just after they had a very successful few days here. the victim blaming is awful.

OP posts:
Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/03/2020 11:19

DM sent paps for hire to stalk MM, and pretend she was looking at the camera

Do you have any evidence for this please?
I'll say quite frankly that I don't know either way, but it seems you have better information ... otherwise, isn't it just speculation which apparently we're supposed to avoid?

Mummy195 · 12/03/2020 12:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread