@CoubousAndTourmalet They'll still manage to think it's a Pyrenean anyway! I have noticed more cream coloured litters these days and, as you say, the ones years ago were darker...
@SpanielsGalore You're right!
It's interesting as 'red' and mixed colours are deemed unacceptable (i.e. they can only be Golden or Cream, but if they are Golden or Gold they can have some white on the chest but that's it).
Twatdog has cream hindquarters, and a cream chest/stomach and tail and he's been very successful. His sire was Ovinglay Locksmith (and genuinely, they could be twins - down to the devil eyes. If you do a quick google, you'll see what I mean!). And neither of them have been hugely successful in the ring (I hadn't expected Twatdogs colours to go the way they did tbh) in part because they're not 'breed standard.' Twatdog still does reasonably well, but not as well as he should (IMO).
But all my girls and the sires I've used who have been successful in the ring - including the stud of the latest litter who is a very close relatives to the stud I used for twatdog - have been very sucessfull including JW etc have all been cream. One of DMums girls did incredibly well and she was cream.
It drives me bonkers as, being honest, twatdog is the best example of his breed I have come across (even if he is a massive bellend). Yet, because of his colours, he will never be as successful as a cream one.
But it also amuses me, because of all the dogs I've ever had it's twatdog that I get stopped about, and asked about, and who is complimented - but he's the only dog I've had who isn't 'breed standard' by KC regs. Actually...Satan is sable (golden, black and brown), and DMum get's stopped all the time with Satan and people compliment her. Satan is the devil in dog form, but she is stunning.
So, now I think about it, it's the dogs that aren't 'breed standard' that people seem to find the most appealing.