Right class. Paying attention everyone?
PVish. Stop mucking about with CD or I'll have to send you out.
Lets see if I can remember them all. (Bear in mind I had a baby 5 months ago and brain still resembles a slab of swiss cheese)
- The second interview/confession. She went ahead wivaaaht her brief. This would have to have been authorised by a Superinendent or Inspector before interview started. Coupled with the "bribe" offered by DI Sleezeball to let her see her daughter (if she ever tells anyone about this), these are major breaches of the Codes of Practice and would, IMO, mean the jury wouldn't hear the confession. But she will have to tell her brief about what DI Sleezeball said.
- She would have been assesed by a doctor straight away and prob have been deemed unfit for interview.
- Daughter would have been interviewed on video within the time scale that her mother was in custody, not nine months after the event and no written statement would have been done.
4.Or daughter would have been arrested immediately, cautionned and interviewed on tape and once established she was not the one who plunged the knife into him, released and then video statment taken
- Would not have been charged in cell like that. No no no. Big song and dance would have been made.
FWIW I think that there are police that operate like DI Sleazeball. Plenty who don't but I think his tactics in the police station, well, lets say that didn't seem unrealistic.
There were a couple of other things I remember thinking oh no no no at the time but my swiss cheese brain cannot now recall what they were.
dandy you flatter me BTW!!! DS1 has played mariocart since getting back from playgroup and is now flashing his willie to me. Activities? Well we may go swimming in a bit.....