@stayathomegardeneri can’t understand the refusal to engage in a reconstruction, which is a perfectly routine thing to happen when there is suspicion a crime has been commited. And the McCanns were totally convinced there had been a crime, as their first (and only) assumption was an abduction.
i wonder whether their refusal to participate was because a reconstruction could have shown their version of timings, checking on the children, to be incorrect?
FWIW my opinion is that the McCanns didn’t directly cause MM harm; I think it would be nigh on impossible to keep the campaign going so publicly for so long if they actually knew what had happened to her. But there is a wide spectrum between being directly responsible and being whiter than white. Obviously they were astonishingly negligent in putting all three children at risk, quite apart from anything, any of the children could have been scared/ sick/ had a nightmare/ MM could have got out of bed and hurt herself etc etc. And alongside this, the arrogant attitude, refusal to accept they did anything wrong and refusal to participate in a reconstruction don’t sit well with many people. I do wonder whether the children were checked as frequently or at the actual times the McCanns have claimed. A reconstruction could have thrown light on any inaccuracies - and equally, could have helped to piece together an accurate time line.