Jaz played it so well. He did nearly have it. Mollie robbed him.
People saying
• he spoke too late - well, that's how he got to the final
• he didn't have strong convictions - he wasn't informed, he accepted he might be wrong, he knew he was going on guesses and intuition (so admirable in rl to acknowledge you might be wrong)
• He wasn't influential- he didn't know who to trust. He was trying to get the balance right as to not get too much attention (again- that's why he was in the final) + the guy does not know how to manipulate; the few times he tried to voice his theories he was dismissed (def racial and cultural bias at play too). People saying his points weren't made clearly and was convoluted - he wasn't clear himself, he was guessing, he was careful not to sound like he is 100% sure because he wasn't and that could get him banished/ murdered...
And when I said Mollie robbed him -
Andrew gave it to her on a plate. He was a traitor, he was naming a traitor. Harry said he is sure Jaz isn't a traitor- how would he know if he was a mere faithful. Jaz brought up H at the last banishment quite convincingly- enough to plant some seeds there for her. He pre warned her to pay extra attention and approach with curiosity- she didn't. And of course, H wanting to end the game when J was proving he was a faithful by asking for a final banishment...
But she didn't want it to be true and she lost Jaz the game he played so well. She said she doesn't trust him and he does suspicious things, (while Harry was telling her she is 100% not going to be murdered!), and I really think it was because he looked and talked different to the people she grew up around. Such a shame.
It was a Harry and Jaz final for me, and sadly M was a little pawn who just tipped the scales in H's favour.