What I don't understand was the way the final played out from the players' perspectives:
Evie knew she was on the chopping block. She could have sounded out the others views on other possible traitors and picked up Jaz's Harry theory which Andrew also seemed willing to get on board with. The three of them could have got Harry banished. She could also have- knowing she was faithful- have given more thought to the Harry shield thing and got people talking about that more. Either she didn't or no one could work anything out from it so it went nowhere.
If Jaz was so good at sniffing out Harry and Jaz has a job that seems to require intelligence, why didn't he crunch the numbers and see that when there were 5 of them was his best chance to oust Harry. Evie would have been onboard as she knew her banishment was coming. Andrew was wobbling on Harry and they had a small chat about 'he who must not be named'. Yet Jaz voted for the person most likely to support his theory.
The producers got their dream ending - the smartest player being voted out last due to the vote of a young woman clearly in turmoil leaving one faithful and one traitor who then reveals himself and takes all the money. We are all talking about it. I wonder if the whole edit was favourable to Jaz to make him look like a little suspicion about Harry was actually a concrete hunch?
At the round table when Jaz questioned Harry, Harry's defence was 'Paul was throwing out names everywhere'. Why didn't Jaz reply with 'yes but the conversation he said I had with you Harry was pretty much word for word exactly what I HAD said to you?'