I actually do not believe it is the UK’s responsibility to deal with the aftermath of terrorist ‘grooming’ that happens ‘on our soil’ (it didn’t, she was groomed by somebody from Canada allegedly, online.) By that, I mean that we should absolutely be trying to stop it where we can as it is an issue of public concern, but we are not responsible for it happening. We also should not be held responsible to deal with the aftermath of this either.
I find it mind boggling that a school in central london can have such an issue with terrorist sympathising, yet the parents had to receive a letter from the police to address this? Why had the school not directly informed the parents? Why were the parents to oblivious and unaware as to what was going on? Was there a general rhetoric in the atmosphere which blurred the lines between being a sympathiser and girls actively mobilising to go to Syria? I suspect so.
Terrorism, whether terrorists or sympathisers are groomed or not, is an external phenomenon designed to attack the internal fabric and structure of this country. It is directly opposed to the values of the U.K. and it is by nature, not something that is commonplace in BRITISH culture. So, not our internal responsibility to have to fix those that choose to follow extremism. I believe any extremist should be extradited.
I for one am not ‘white British’ and I am incredibly grateful to this country. I absolutely do not believe that anybody, whether ethnically English or otherwise should be allowed back into this country should they involve themselves in terrorism.
If SB has learning difficulties I would suggest that would be the only alternative I could find to excuse what she did. That said, if she had, do we not think this would be an argument used by her lawyer? She has a very driven PR team around her I would be surprised it hasn’t been used to position her as more vulnerable?
If there is no learning difficulty, I still find it very hard to imagine that anybody could be groomed so thoroughly that they are accepting of murdering and killing in such a brutal extreme manner. There is absolutely no correlation between the Rotherham girls and terrorists. Two totally different motivations.
SB was not groomed by a potential lover, she was enticed by violence and Islamist extremist rhetoric. It suggests to me that she may have been brought up with suggestive views, or existing values that made the jump into terrorism that much more acceptable. She should absolutely be made an example of.