It does surprise me that if the press is so annoying to them both for various reasons which of course I can understand as regards Harry, then why go on twitter at all? I don't use it and my life is no worse for that. Why read the newspapers? Why go online? Why not just live a fairly off line life quietly in the country somewhere?
I did watch all the episodes and parts of it were interesting. I think it was deliberately masking the truth at times over some of the issues on the thread, as these programmes often do.
I am interested in the issue of the late witness statement the Schillings solicitor (for MM) says was produced late in the day to help one side as presumably that can be proved one way or the other. I just looked it up
"During the newspaper’s appeal against summary judgment in the case, which was awarded to the duchess, new evidence from Mr Knauf came to light over Meghan’s earlier claim in court documents that she did not know if, and to what extent, her communications team had also co-operated with the authors of Finding Freedom, a flattering biography about her and Harry.
He disclosed that he had provided information to the writers ‘with her knowledge’, and had emails to prove it.
Meghan was forced to apologise to the court – but said she had no intent to mislead it and had simply ‘not remembered’ the relevant exchanges at the time.
The Court of Appeal judge who dismissed the newspaper’s appeal described it as ‘at best, an unfortunate lapse of memory on her part’.
In the Netflix documentary, Meghan’s lawyer, Jenny Afia, goes so far as to suggest William would have given his authority for Mr Knauf to come forward in the case, saying: ‘A senior member of the Duke of Cambridge’s team came forward to give this witness statement which wasn’t required. And sadly there is just no way he could have done that without the authority of his bosses.’ "
In general witnesses have a duty not to mislead the court so if something new comes out or you realise an earlier witness statement was wrong then very urgently you file another to correct that (as lying in a statement can lead to a jail sentence as Archer and that other Tory politician who found God in jail both found to their cost)