Catching up on thread (was avoiding spoilers) but I'm now at the point of shouting at the tv!
Jill didn't stop her learning, realising, accepting who her son really was! She had 18 years before Jill met him to see the real son she had.
But I'm also crying, because it's so clear how much they love Richie.
The ward for Richie in 1988 is more akin to what I saw things changing to in hospitals outside of London in the mid to late 90's. It takes time for these changes to filter through.
@Thimbleberries the first wave of patients were mainly gay men, iv drug addicts and prostitutes. The drug addicts and prostitutes from what I've read and also sort of based on personal experience, were less likely to go to a dr and get a diagnosis and so were often not diagnosed until they died and that fact was very much hidden for several years. It was gay men who first were politically active on the matter too, drug addicts being generally speaking more tied up in their addiction and prostitutes usually had many issues too which prevented them from being activists, so it was the gay men that did it.
I met prostitutes who wouldn't be tested because their pimps would batter them if they did and batter them more if they were positive, they also feared being made homeless as they were often living with their pimps too. And of course they had children and they didn't want the huge stigma attached to them - which it was if it was discovered. There were kids getting bullied if their mothers were sick, there was also issues with foster carers refusing to take children who's parents/mothers were positive. That's something I have NEVER seen discussed ANYWHERE but I know it happened
In terms of spread, I'm not sure of stats but I believe it spread more quickly to iv drug users. I think because they tend not to look after themselves health wise not just in terms of their addiction but poor diet etc
What has annoyed me is people on other sm claiming that the scenes with locked hospital rooms etc didn't happen - they are wrong! They may not have experienced it but it DID Happen.
I think valeries actions were wrong and sad and heartbreaking, but I agree she was dealing with something she'd no comprehension of. My mother is mid 70's and would be around a decade younger than her. My mum is pretty open minded and accepting but my dad, well if my brother were gay that would be a major problem!
Religion certainly didn't help matters, I'm Catholic raised and there's still a lot of issues within the Catholic community regarding hiv/aids, which is somewhat ironic given the Catholic contribution to the spread of hiv/aids in Africa in particular.
I think that meant that straight couples weren't engaging in as much casual sex / we're using condoms to prevent pregnancy.
Again I don't know stats but ime this was not the case. The pill was the main contraceptive of choice in the 80's for heterosexuals. I can well remember so so many friends having arguments with boyfriends/dates/ons who were very resistant to using condoms "cos I'm clean you can see I'm clean/I ain't gay I'm not even bi" etc even when we KNEW that Hetero transmission was a risk, maybe not as much of a risk as Anal sex but still a risk. I dumped 2 boyfriends for this attitude as I was petrified and I refused to have unsafe sex with them. I also had friends who imo were careless and blasé and were frankly lucky given their behaviour at the time.
@Thimbleberries you seem to have very odd ideas about sexual behaviour in the 80's? OF COURSE there was lots of casual sex happening, this was 2 decades after the sexual revolution! (For hets) I genuinely think you need to learn more about social history from that era. You seem to think it was more like the 40's/50's (and I can assure you casual sex was happening then too! Both my grans were pregnant when married and 1 hadn't been dating my grandfather very long! I'm the product of a shotgun wedding myself!)
Regarding Henry and Juan, there's no agreement on exactly how long hiv/aids has actually been around, there are some theories that it was around as early as the 1910's! I think that theories placing it as being around as early as the 1890's have been debunked but the truth is we don't know for sure.
What was also likely a factor is greater migration. The lack of spread isn't necessarily just down to certain behaviours not being prevalent (gay sex and anal sex after all have been around for millenia!) but may have been constrained simply by the lack of human travel. So the development of the flight industry is very probably a factor.
As a young person in the 80s I can assure that there was a LOT of risky, out of wedlock sex going on absolutely!
I don't think people realise that Elton John, Freddie Mercury, Kenneth Williams , Frankie Howerd etc were not considered to be gay. They were funny, 'a caution'
Sorry but my experience was that this was known/acknowledged just not openly discussed. My parents and even grandparents knew and understood that certain famous people were gay they just didn't mention it in public
But I agree it was still taboo enough that a mother wouldn't have wanted to admit to themselves that their son was gay.
@DishedUp another issue then was hiv positive gay men who actively chose to only have sex with other hiv positive gay men, what wasn't known then was there were different strains of hiv and some more deadly than others.
and they were just naive 21 year olds by the end it started in 1981 when they were 18 and ended in 1989, they'd have been 26/27 by then
The more of your posts I read the more I think you've lead an extremely sheltered and limited life.
I'm an army brat, my friends ARE my family, I'm closer to them than my immediate family
And they're the ones that have truly been there for me.