If the two worst contestants in a round are equally bad, it would be fair enough for the judges to take previous weeks into consideration when deciding who goes. But that wasn’t the case here. Messy though they were, Laura’s bakes were clearly head and shoulders above Hermine’s. I felt really sorry for Hermine but she completely messed up her signature and show stopper.
I remember the Rahul scenario and the reason he stayed was that Manon (who went) didn’t fulfil the brief. I think it was Danish pastries and she just made something different! However good a baker is, it would hardly be fair to let them through when they haven’t fulfilled the task set.
I was so rooting for Hermine and I felt sorry for her but The judges make it clear that (apart from the couple of unusual circumstances I’ve just described) they will judge each round in its own right.
If this week had been the first round, nobody would have batted an eyelid at Hermine going as she was clearly the worst. So going by the judges’ criteria of taking each round as a separate entity - she had to go.
It might seem harsh, particularly in the final but the judges really are upfront about it.
Perfect Peter is by far the most consistently good baker but if he messes up in the final I can quite believe he won’t be crowned the winner