...for an equivalent standard of song, we tend to pick up fewer of these points than other countries. This is where politics are against the UK.
Oubliette Bravo
How do you objectively define 'an equivalent standard of song'?
If one song finishes last and one song finishes 13th then they are demonstrably not the equivalent standard of song. One song had enough fans and jury votes to vote it to 13th while the other tanked with the voting public and the juries.
Why would a jury member from any of the 20 non EU countries that entered the ESC this year have some political axe to grind against the UK?
As it turns out, this year the UK got most of its votes (13) from the jury vote. Ireland accounted for the other three votes, bringing a total of 16. Is it neighbourly voting or something else when Ireland votes for a UK entry?
But even though the jury vote awarded us more, poor Michael didn't fare too well when it came to those votes, either. He earned a meagre 13 points from the judges.
Belarus were the kindest, giving us five points. Norway, Hungary and Armenia each awarded us two points, while Switzerland and Georgia threw us one point each.
Meanwhile, when it came to who the British public gave their votes to, our douze points went to Norway, while we handed 10 to Australia and 8 to Iceland.
www.digitalspy.com/tv/reality-tv/a27518306/eurovision-2019-countries-voted-for-uk-public-vote/