Spot on @HollowTalk.
I contemplated name changing for this, but stuff it I can do it later.
15 years ago I logged on to our PC and thought my husband had been shopping for my Christmas pressie, searching through the browsing history I discovered that he had been looking at abuse images of children. That instant our marriage was over, and I called the police and he was eventually prosecuted.
However, the whole living in a caravan scenario in the programme - so far from reality - my ex was entitled to half of everything as per normal divorce entitlement - he got free counselling as part of ‘rehabilitation’...I ended up paying for private counselling, and over the years has secured many lucrative IT roles in central Scotland (especially when disclosure checks where not de rigour)....so he was left in no way downtrodden (or sorry/ repentant I will add).
Yet, the programme also seem to miss that at the heart of every single one of these images is a child that has been horrendously abused, and the abuse is continued by every single person who goes looking for these images. It’s the trauma, depression and PTSD that the victims suffer that should be front and centre, and not that of the perpetraitors who make a conscious choice to go looking for these images in the first place.