Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

Related: Film discussion forum.

1 2 3 4

Related: Film discussion forum.

Telly addicts

Trinny & Susannah Undress ...... on now ....

83 replies

Snowstorm · 03/10/2006 20:39

Is anyone watching this? The epitome of car crash TV .... oh my god it's excruciating ..... eeeeeek!

OP posts:

Report

Snowstorm · 03/10/2006 21:13

MrsFish, she did look better because she looked more confident and therefore happier and her hair cut was softer and a big improvement ... but I think that perhaps she would have been dressed better had she been on their 'What not to wear' programme.

OP posts:

SoMuchToBats · 03/10/2006 21:13

Well, I think she did look a bit better, but not as much better as he did IYSWIM. But I don't think it will save their marriage.

MrsFish · 03/10/2006 21:16

Snowstorm - thank you for that.

Its a pity they have moved to ITV, as I really enjoyed What Not to Wear, and I don't really like the new presenters yet.

cowmod · 03/10/2006 21:16

finny and i were sying htat liza tarbuck woudl haev been g reat on the bbec version

cowmod · 03/10/2006 21:16

finny and i were sying htat liza tarbuck woudl haev been g reat on the bbec version

Bozza · 03/10/2006 21:18

He looked much better but lets face it the chances of him looking anything but better were fairly slim. She looked better but I agree they could have done more with her - still had her looking a bit matronly.

Actually probably the best IMO was that outfit that he bought her that she said was tarty. The shoes and trousers looked good and the top might have looked better with a bra that fit. She was very dismissive of it though - but him down a lot and he seemed to be lacking in self-confidence.

cowmod · 03/10/2006 21:19

i dont like her crepeye cleavage
god s and t and their flipping wrap dresses

controlfreaky2 · 03/10/2006 21:20

i love love love liza tarbuck. she is a goddess and can do no wrong.

Snowstorm · 03/10/2006 21:22

Sorry to back-track but I'm still in shock ... WHY on earth did T&S invite the couples friends around for dinner ... to then start asking the couple what I regarded as pretty personal questions in front of them?? Must have been the squirmiest/most excruciating dinner party ever!

OP posts:

Bozza · 03/10/2006 21:23

They are a bit obsessed. Was very unsure about S's yellow outfit also.

cowmod · 03/10/2006 21:23

the broccoli was wrorryingly grey

cowmod · 03/10/2006 21:23

but GREY IS IN!!!!

foxtrottingtotransylvania · 03/10/2006 21:44

it was excruciatingly bad, who do they think they are. asking personal questions about their sex life. And what was that 'naked behind the screen' bit for fgs?. I've taken it off my sky+ scheduler

venusinfurs · 03/10/2006 21:55

I completely disagree! I thought it was brilliant television. I can't believe they got people to do it, but it was great TV. C'mon! I bet it gets great ratings and everyone on here watches it next week

badkarma · 03/10/2006 22:01

What was all the wrist licking about? man that was just gross!

noddyholder · 03/10/2006 22:04

I really liked it but I do like crap telly for chilling out Love their hair this time and like the clothes The couple looked awful after

Kibby · 03/10/2006 22:07

is it repeated does anyone know - missed it

bubblerock · 03/10/2006 22:08

Can't be any worse than C4 now bleurgh!!

robinpud · 03/10/2006 22:18

It was yak yak yak.. dd aged 9 came back from athletics at the end and I turned it off to avoid her asking what the handcuffs were for.
At least they did mention clothes a little more often than their BBc 1 replacements.
Can you imagine the xmas special with famous couples.. I bet Christine Hamilton is on the phone now.
As for the hairdresser telling him his hair was George clooney like!!! Pah
did they get any of ITV's money to spend????
Cannot really see how it will have helped them in the longterm to air such huge personal issues on live tv whilst being sponsored by Littlewoods.

cowmod · 03/10/2006 22:19

ditto re sky plus

Gobbledispook · 03/10/2006 22:23

Get away! It was most entertaining!

What the devil was S doing wearing that yellow monstrosity? Vile!

mummylin2495 · 03/10/2006 22:23

i cany believe that a couple would answer questions about their sex lives and let the nation know ,how disrespectful to each other is that,and what makes the presenters qualified to put marriages right ,i though they just dressed people ! i didnt like the long red dress ,looked like something queen victoria would of worn !

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Email address

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Bozza · 04/10/2006 08:56

Yes I thought being sponsored by Littlewoods was rather ironic.

NomDePlume · 04/10/2006 09:05

I caught the last 10 mins of it, and frankly, that was enough. What a load of rot. And WHAT WERE THOSE RANCID SHOES THEY PUT ON THE GIANT WOMAN ?! Really grim.

robin3 · 04/10/2006 09:17

Used to love it but the new format made me cringe...had to switch off at the naked silouette bit and then I switched back on to see them scattering rose petals. Yuk

Bring back sad deluded women with pineapple hairdos and lurex boob tubes.

Flip

1 2 3 4

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.