Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Teenagers

Parenting teenagers has its ups and downs. Get advice from Mumsnetters here.

Do you read their texts?

135 replies

MrsSnape · 31/03/2008 21:25

If your teens have mobiles, do you sneak a look at their texts or completely respect their privacy?

OP posts:
ranting · 07/04/2008 20:43

I still haven't changed my mind, I don't and won't read ds' texts and emails. I taught him to cross the road properly and only let him do it by himself when I felt he could be trusted to, same with the internet. I taught him how to use it properly and when I felt confident about it, I let him have bebo etc. I was only 3 years older than he is now, when I left home and I did a lot of things that made my parents lose a lot of sleep but they let me get on with it in the hope that they could trust my judgement, (don't think my mum checked MY letters, although she did my brothers).

lilQuidditchKel · 07/04/2008 20:51

such interesting reading...my DCs are under 3 so thankfully this isn't an issue (yet) for me

but I must wonder aloud...

how and when do you draw a line between supervision and violating privacy? Is it an age thing?

At 2 years old it's generally expected that parents will oversee any activity, especially television and computer use (if applicable). So when a mobile is added to the mix, isn't it the same? At least at first?

Getmeouttahere and Seeker, seems like your approach might be a good start...but still at what age do you treat them like adults?

getmeouttahere · 07/04/2008 21:25

welllll Quidditch...errmmmmm

When she is 30 ?

Seriously, I don't know that yet. I am sure its dependent on a lot of things. I can tell by her conversations with me, her interaction with her friends, her general outlook etc etc that at the moment she is quite immature even for a 12 yr old. That is before I even "snoop".

BTW, I am not constantly "snooping" just to set the record straight. The OP asked "do you..." and yes I do, potentially. Not all the time. For example, if she has had a long convo on MSN with someone I don't necessarily know, I MIGHT just peep at the general tone. She knows this. I don't want to read reams of that daft txt-speak FFS. Teenage convo's are by their very nature, rather boring LOL. All hi's and bye's and not much else

So, I guess the answer to the question of when do you stop, is when you feel happy with her ability to exercise mature judgement. That is totally immeasurable and will of course be different for every child.

fortyplus · 08/04/2008 12:38

I think that children start to give you guidelines about how they would like you to behave, and it's then up to you either to adjust your behaviour or to discuss things with them. So... for example... when mine were 2 I bathed them and wiped their bums. Now they're 12 and 14 they make it clear that they're not happy for us to see their 'privates'. (They don't object to seeing our, though! ) Both of them have asked us to knock before coming into the bathroom if they're in there. I tend to avoid going in at all, but if I do I knock so they have time to plonk a flannel on the bits. I think it's a bit daft, as we're all family, but I respect that they have a different opinion.

It's the same with texts/computers etc. Until now they have only had access to the family computer in full view of us, but ds1 will be starting GCSE coursework in Sept so will have his own laptop. We've already had the chat about appropriate use - that he needs to understand that the broadband account is in dh's name and that's who would be investigated if hard porn sites were being accessed.

As for texts... mine have pay as you go mobiles and use about £1 a month to tell me where they want to be picked up! I guess you have to use your judgement about how much you trust your own child.

zazen · 11/04/2008 11:06

It is interesting isn't trying to get the balance right.

Obviously we don't want our kids to be exposed to pedophiles and adults when they are innocently tapping away with what appears to be their peers - or even not so innocently texting, but we hope that they will be sensible and not put themselves at risk.

We have all kinds of security measures on our computers now. Our DD is 3.7 and I found her clicking on some youtube videos... close call - I changed the settings quickly after that - I didn't even know she knew how to open an application!! We have a few sites only she can see, and I'm with her now everytime. We don't have a TV, so she just loves videos and animations online.

My niece was being groomed when she was 6 yo, thirteen years ago. She found an AOL chat room, and talked about her new pussycat. My sister was HORRIFIED! So it just goes to show that it isn't as rare as some posters feel: just happening to someone else in the papers. The wonderful thing about the internet and mobile technology though is, that if you do find your child is being exposed to anything dangerous, it's traceable, and can stand as evidence in a court of law to prosecute the pedophile/s.

There is a balance, and it does depend on the age and world wise-ness of the child and teen. But I'm happy to severely restrict acces to the internet for my 3yo DD untill she can show me that she's aware of how these sites work and why and how she's going to be safe on them.

I'm not sure as a mother to a girl why some posters are happy enough to let their boys get into trouble, when they would monitor their daughter's usage very closely.. the only thing I could think this discrepancy of monitoring would mean was that a pregnancy, HIV, hepatitis, cervical cancer (caused by the STD human papilloma virus) or other sexually transmitted disease was feared for a girl more than for a boy. That's a strange attitude and warrants further exploration.

Would their boys deny a pregnancy/ STD? would they as parents be complicit in this? Aren't pregnancy and deathly diseases as serious for a girl-teen as they are to a boy-teen? Are boy-teens somehow exempt from being sick or a parent?
As a boy-teen's parents do they not want to be involved with their son's baby / recovery or treatment for a potentially deadly STD? Maybe I was picking that post up wrong? I do most sincerely hope so!

However regarding privacy, I have to say my DD's written diary will be out of bounds to me, I've no window into my DD's soul, apart from what she choses to share with me - these thoughts are her own, and I may as well bring her up in room 101 as pry into her inner soul, and make her feel violated there where she should feel most at home and safest.

My own mother read my diary and would casually mention things in it to me - and I stopped trusting her with anything that actually matters to me completely. She just doesn't deserve to be on my 'most trusted' list. We have a cordial, but mundane relationships, and I feel the loss of not having a close relationship with her everyday.

If that's what you want from and for your children, by all means breach their trust. But watch out! Your relationship may go down the tubes forever, just because of your prying.

In my experience trust is earned and it's a two way thing - for example how many of us actually ask their teens for advice about things - if we start to do this, perhaps there might be a precedent set of helping each other in this open and trusting way, rather than an un-democratic, un-negotiated top down way: and you never know you might be surprised by the wisdom of what you hear!

There is a huge difference between a 12 year old and a 15 year old. Sometimes our overzealous desire to protect can have unintended consequences. There is a need for balance - at the moment I severely restrict my 3 year olds access to the internet, and probably will until she's about 10, but as she shows more wisdom, I'll ease off. I'll try and foster a feeling of anything being open for discussion. I really enjoy her company now, and I can't wait to have even more interesting conversations with her when she's older!

J33 · 11/04/2008 14:10

It was a strange text message on my step DD(15 just)old phone that made me take a look at not the texts but her photo gallery - huge shock - photos of herself in underwear- which had been sent to a very appreciative male. I was so upset but have talked about the matter of this photo taking by using another person. She isn't a slapper and the last thing i want is for anyone to think that she is because of this photo taking. But all her friends are doing it to and those photos are going on bebo etc. frightening!!!

jellybelly2007 · 11/04/2008 15:04

The deal I had with my DS1 (10.8) when he got his phone aged 9 was that it was subject to spot checks at any time, although I tend to look through the pics and videos more than the texts, as I once found some very sweary (and actually quite hilarious) videos of postman pat and tintin, which I then insisted he deleted as they werent age appropriate (after of course bluetoothing them to my phone so I can share their hilarity with friends). We have a very honest relationship, he has even come and said, look at this mam, X sent it to me, I know I shouldnt have this on my phone, but its sooo funny, I wanted to show you before I delete it!
So I dont actually spot check it much now, just if I see him and his mates gathered round giggling quietly, and it tends to be a pic of a page 3 girl that X has sent him. X's mum never checks her DS phone, and he has allsorts on it!

PurpleOne · 17/04/2008 23:49

I don't check her texts per se, but I do spot checks on her msn history.

I'm glad I do check. She thinks I don't know her password, I just watch her fingers. Had an incident with finding her on bebo 2 years ago (she's 12 btw) and found one of her friends making slanderous and rascist comments about dd2.

All seems to have reared it's ugly head again tonight as I found out she's on Tagged, which I didn't object to until I checked her inbox.

Somebody pertaining to be 33 and wanking off over her picture...to which dd1 replied 'fancy msn'ing?' and 'when you on next'?

Am in total shock, but yes, am glad I do check.
Call me a nosy cow, but if there's trouble, dd1 is usually involved somewhere. She has never nurtured her firnedships.

random · 18/04/2008 08:04

Jellybelly The postman pat video is very funny

Lola234 · 21/07/2008 10:42

depends if you have reason to doubt them, then you should. but otherwise dont.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread