I have one DC (toddler) with DH who has older children from previous relationship. Both older primary.
When my DC was born I set up a bank account for him and pay into it monthly. DH doesn't pay into it but not really bothered about that.
Mt SC have never had a bank account and since I set up DS's, DH has always made noises about how he wants to set theirs up.
Anyway... DS recently got quite a bit of money from a relative in cash. I said to DH last night that I'll go to the bank tomorrow and put it in his account at which point he was going on again about setting up SC a bank.
We basically got onto a bit of a snippy argument with each other because he suggested I could have done it and when I said why? It needs a parents signature, their passports etc... He said well he could have given me those and "you'd have wanted to do it before DS was born but now you're only bothered about him".
Basically my AIBU is AIBU to think why the fuck should I be the one to set up SC's bank accounts when neither of their parents have? Especially considering I'll need DH anyway or their Mum to sign it. Like am I some sort of slave or something? Wtf... Why on earth can't one of his parents do it if they are so arsed?!
It's a common theme this whole "you're not as bothered since DS was born" crap.
I just walked away before it went any further because I really couldn't be arsed but I imagine the next thing coming would have been about me having more time to do these things than him because I'm at home (work very part time at the moment). But surely some things still need to be the responsibility of their parents? Especially things like banking which requires ID and signatures etc..?