[quote flippertygibbit]@Couldhavebeenme2
The difference is you wanted your DC to have contact with their DF. The OP's DP is not in this position. His ex is doing absolutely everything she can to stop contact and this includes emotional abuse of the DC. My DP was right to walk away, so many years down the line we wish it was different but it was still the right decision. So very, very sad.[/quote]
I'm happy that I've done everything I possibly can to encourage my ex to see the kids. He's refused everything - mediation, court application for contact (by me, sadly unenforceable if one parent chooses not to see the dc) and I'm 100% secure that I have done everything I can to maintain my kid's relationship with their dad, and he chooses to deny them.
In OPs case yes, I agree that it sounds like the ex is doing everything she can to frustrate contact (a bit like mine in reverse), but her dh is doing absolutely nothing concrete/legal to even seek contact. It really is as simple as making that first legal step to begin the process - and op is not even going that far.
As PPs have said, there is nothing that would keep me from my kids, and if it did, actually, take bankruptcy (unlikely, with direct access barrister and ad-hoc SHL) to achieve that, I'd consider it money well spent. And if the ex still frustrated that, I'd have boxes and boxes of evidence to show the kids how bloody hard I'd tried.
250 miles is hard but not an impossible distance to maintain family ties, relationships and commitments.
OP and her dh are just rolling over, with nothing at all but shrugged shoulders as a defence.