@Lougle I hope adjusting the meds helps.
I imagine there have been private providers among the list of tried and failed placements.
I don’t think the Judge could answer the questions posed in your post without the ICB being party to proceedings.
I’m not sure there is consensus on what support should be provided. “It is one thing to say that AD's risks arise principally from neurodevelopmental and attachment-related difficulties. It is another to explain who is responsible for treating those difficulties, where such treatment will be provided, what therapeutic regime is proposed, what professional will deliver it and by what mechanism those interventions are to be sustained given AD's presentation.” (My bold.)
How you can answer the where, who, etc. questions without nailing down the what and needs behind that I don’t know.
Reading the judgement passing the buck is at least part of the problem. After commenting positively about the actions of the mother and LA, the judgement states “The same unfortunately cannot be said with confidence about the response of the wider State.” Later on, it states “Reading this material as a whole, one is left with the uncomfortable impression that mental health services have been rather more successful in explaining why they cannot help than in explaining how they will help.”