Keep, I'm never anything other than honest, tbh. If someone asked me my experience of something, I'd tell them. I wouldn't be dishonest to save them from themselves.
It may seem to you that I had an easy ride with DD1. Perhaps in comparison to some I did - she certainly ended up at the right destination, which is a minor miracle at school entry age when you haven't been to a special nursery (and co-incidentally, I've been at a party tonight, talking to a parent of a girl who has joined DD1's class this year, Year 3, after going to special nursery then mainstream primary until they managed to get her into special school). I still had to raise concerns at 8mo, 10mo, 15mo, 17mo, 20mo. Then still had to insist on referral to Paed at 2y9mo, before DD1 conveniently fell over for no reason. Had she not had her epilepsy diagnosis she wouldn't have had the EEG which urged the Paed to order an MRI to establish the reason for uneven electrical discharge. I still had to kick up a fuss with the SALT department when her SALT was ineffective and I still had to manage every appointment to ensure she got provision. I still had to tell the Inclusion Co-Ordinator that I wasn't satisfied with her pace and I'd apply for the statement myself.
Handy yes, on 01/01/13 I saw DD1's Paed with DD2. I had provided in advance a comprehensive document about our concerns. I had given over 20 specific examples of her language. Examples such as:
• 'I am so shopping tired and all that twisting and turning, I'm boy oh boy oh tired!'
• “But I do actually love quicker ones” – she meant softer liquorice.
• “When will the grass stop watering my feet?” (We had walked over a field with wet grass)
• “What is all this stuffs that we give to Patch but we can’t eat doing all here?”
• ‘What is making all that pieces of noises?’ (She heard the sound of a game I was playing on the computer).
• ‘Patch can have tuna because it is strong for him!’
• ‘After I’ve finished breakfast, could I please not have orange juice?’
• ‘I need to be shush as possible, do I?’
• 'On the day that wasn't Wednesday but after Thursday....'
I also gave detailed accounts of her literal thinking, impaired play skills, basically every aspect of development.
He dismissed it with a wave of his hand and said that he 'couldn't get too worked up about a few grammatical errors.' He had no intention of referring to SALT. I emailed him to say that on reflection, we felt SALT referral was necessary and please could he refer.
In June the SALT went in to school. She found skills to be within range. She noted lack of response to non-verbal cues, etc. but found that they weren't impairing her function (because school said so) and therefore there was no role for SALT.
I gave a quite short document to last week's SALT, but she didn't seem interested.
Star that analogy is good. At the moment they're at the 'pain denying' stage.
Incidentally, the teacher stopped me to tell me DD2 is working independently in class now, the day after the SALT had been in, and the day after that DD2 got star cushion the day 'for getting on with her work independently.'