Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dear MNHQ, I didn't see all the problems kick off over poor Revjustabout...

1010 replies

georgimama · 20/01/2009 12:38

but I would be grateful if you could tell me that you have at least given serious consideration to banning the posters who were harrassing her.

Thank you.

OP posts:
smallorange · 20/01/2009 14:24

Lol Carmenere

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 20/01/2009 14:25

(although your link suggests I'm wrong - shall bow to your greater authority! Never heard Rev Mr though)

MarmadukeScarlet · 20/01/2009 14:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 14:25

in the Anglican church 'The Reverend Mr' is used for Deacons this says wikipedia

wannaBe · 20/01/2009 14:25

I think people misunderstand the term supervision.

When someone who works in an empathetic role, ie a counsellor, psychologist, someone in the church they have the option to take their workload to supervision. That doesn't mean that their supervisor comes on to mumsnet or sits in on their counselling sessions to ensure that what they are posting/advising is right, it means that, every so often, perhaps on a specific basis or on occasions if the need arises, they can go to someone, a supervisor, who is someone also connected with their profession, and offload, as it were.

So say a counsellor has a particularly harrowing case, where a client has been through unspeakable things. Things that are quite disturbing to have to listen to. As a counsellor, you are bound by confidentiality, so you can't go home to your husband and tell them of your day, and that is why you go to supervision, to unburden, so that you are not as deeply affected as you might be otherwise.

I presume this is the kind of supervision that the rev is talking about.

Ingles2 · 20/01/2009 14:25

I totally agree MP. you need to alter your post Justine. As a deacon of the Anglican church she is a rev.
see here

CreativeZen · 20/01/2009 14:26

Oh that's not nice MS. Are we now going to attack people for what they don't say as well as for what they do??

Rhubarb · 20/01/2009 14:27

She'd be supervised by the vicar.

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 14:28

Ah Rhubarb ackershally you are not usually supervised by the vicar if by that you mean the incumbent of the parish where you are working - you are usually supervised by someone who is not involved with your daily work

The Vicar incumbent would however possibly be her line manager

pooka · 20/01/2009 14:28

Blimey - missed all of this hoo ha.

Of course is about moldies. Or rather, it is about PPH wanting desperately to have been right about justabout. Looks like a bandit raid to me.

princesspeahead · 20/01/2009 14:29

Marmaduke are you INSANE?
Of course I think it is wrong for someone to harrass a poster in real life! I am a lawyer. Apart from anything else it is illegal (if we are talking about the legal definition of harrassment).
Why do you think I am SO ANGRY about being accused of it myself?
However I have no idea whether anyone has tried to harrass Rev in real life. All I know is that MN have had complaints about her, and have asked Rev to verify herself. What else has happened? I don't know - do you?

smallorange · 20/01/2009 14:30

OH god I think this thread is actuially going to make me do some housework........

Lauriefairycake · 20/01/2009 14:30

I'm sorry, I can't resist

Can you prove you're a lawyer.........

Rhubarb · 20/01/2009 14:31

Aha MP! Did I say her vicar? I could have meant the vicar of Dibley!

But yeah, I did think it would be her vicar. In the catholic church the Deacon is usually managed by their Parish Priest I think.

princesspeahead · 20/01/2009 14:32

Pooka I could care so little about Rev that I couldn't even be bothered to send MN an email about her.

I DO care about being accused of an orchestrated campaign of harrassment (I posted on 2 threads, count 'em) and of infiltrating her private life (WTF?). The latter accusation is appalling and wrong.

MarmadukeScarlet · 20/01/2009 14:32

CZ, I am not attacking anyone. It would have shown a greater depth of humanity imvho, if PPH had said, "whilst I have not at any point harrassed or stalked poster X, I feel it is not an appropriate thing for anyone to do."

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 14:33

catholic church is more heirarchical with these things actually rhubarb, you are right

anglican church more touchy-feely wooly about it

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 14:34

also catholic church just keeps Deacons chained in the sacristy to do laundry, whereas anglican church makes them work n stuff

princesspeahead · 20/01/2009 14:34

Yep. Right.

If those utterly unfounded accusations about me aren't removed by the end of the day MN and I will have words.

CreativeZen · 20/01/2009 14:34

Well shoot ehr for forgetting to show a greater depth of humanity. WTF. Blimey this site is bizarro.

EachPeachPearMum · 20/01/2009 14:34

I don't think anyone thinks it an appropriate thing to do- so why would anyone spell that our MS? Seem odd- there is something seriously wrong with someone who would harrass someone in rl for comments they made on an anonymous internet forum.

Lauriefairycake · 20/01/2009 14:35

Has ANYONE actually accussed you of harassing the REV in Real Life on this thread princess??????????

Where???

Couching · 20/01/2009 14:35

everyone will have to change their pants soon

jute · 20/01/2009 14:36

OK I know why I misunderstood the role of her supervision. When there was the big fuss about the Sindie she was concerned that her supervisor would see the posts and think it was her, so she rang them and talked about it iirc. She said I think they knew her posting name.

I can see the type of supervision wannabe describes would be entirely normal for someone in a counselling role. I came away (from revs posts) with the idea that there was a supervisor of some sort with whom she was discussing her posts. But I can see now it was just some posts, those on the worship threads I guess.

I guess that does make it more important (for her sake) to separate out 'work' opinions from more general personal ones.

Lauriefairycake · 20/01/2009 14:36

that would be accused and not accussed

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread