Thanks, Scummymummy, who shall we line up against the wall first???
I think the individuals concerned would not behave like that by themselves but when they have their company hats on...
Have you heard any of the lines issued, in D Blunkett's name, to asylum seekers fleeing repressive regimes? Simon Hoggart has been quoting them in his column in the Guardian - eg
"Diary
Clowning around with 'socialism' in the States
Simon Hoggart
Guardian
Saturday April 20, 2002
Speaking of David Blunkett, two weeks ago I mentioned the refugee who was told by the Home Office, specifically in his name, that she couldn't have asylum here because she had been publicly flogged only once.
(This is the bit referred to (from April 6th) :· Here's something else to make you angry. Glenys Kinnock has forwarded me part of a letter sent by our Home Office to a Sudanese woman who has been refused asylum: "With regard to your final arrest, the secretary of state would point out that he does not condone such actions. However, he notes that your public flogging has occurred on only one occasion, and therefore he does not accept that this in itself would constitute persecution."
I'm sure David Blunkett wouldn't write that himself. But it gets send out in his name. )
Now Alasdair Mackenzie, the co-ordinator of Asylum Aid, has written to me with a few more hideously choice examples. One man was rejected because his claim that he had escaped by crossing the Congo was plainly false, since the river is full of crocodiles. But he crossed in Kinshasa, which is a big city and crocodile-free. One independent adjudicator sent a man back to Turkey, where he had been tortured, on the ground that he had borne the torture "with little fortitude". But the grisliest was the letter to a Bosnian Croat who had received death threats while living in Sarajevo at the height of the war: "The secretary of state notes that the threats made against you were not carried out" - in other words you had to be dead already for them to count.
As I said earlier, I am sure David Blunkett doesn't think these things or write these letters. But they go out in his name, as if they conveyed his personal judgment."
Must say, I have trouble believing that the people who write this kind of stuff (or who make the rules for Sainsburys or Martin McColls) really think like that. But you do wonder...