Here is the full posting: - sure generalisations, but I think one can recognise people we know in the generalisations:
"Thought you might like this assessment by a lecturer
I've been a lecturer for decades there are several common types of students, most of whom can have imposter syndrome:
1.The brilliant: never do any noticeable work other than what is compulsory, hands major projects in early because they're "good enough", have hobbies that take up lots of time (often, for some reason music, involving being up half the night). Always gets A's, sometimes submits truly amazing work apparently done on the back of a fag packet. Flicks through a text and understands it. You don't really need to teach them. Doesn't boast or crow, helps others. No danger of impostor syndrome, may actually give lecturers impostor syndrome.
- The bullshitter: slightly above average ability, works a lot but never admits it "gaming all night again" = head down in the books. Comes out of every exam saying how easy it was and how he aced it (yes, always male). Mocks any of his friends who admit to working hard or even trying hard. Gets things in on time having "pulled an all-nighter" to do it (has actually been working steadily in secret). Seldom asks for help from staff, will leach information off friends. Everyone will know when he does well. Easy to teach but not to have as a classmate. Gets B's sometimes A's.
- The honest slogger: average to above average ability. Spends a lot of time in the library. Has encyclopedic knowledge of submission schedule for assignments, office hours of staff and is expert at finding information. Generous to others with this knowledge. Conscientious about making sure they have a good grasp of material, will come to lecturer to ask for help, which they will share. Male or female. Works hard and effectively. Gets things in on time, complete in every aspect. Lovely to teach. Can be undermined by bullshitters. Prone to impostor syndrome. Gets lowish A's and sometimes B's.
- The perfectionist: Average to above average ability. Struggles to finish anything, always asks for extensions to polish work (never gets them, gets upset). Sometimes has to hand in incomplete work. Anxious, unhappy. Hugely undermined by bullshitters, aspires to be a brilliant through hard work (but can never be; brilliants are born not made). Often penalised for excessive length in assignments and includes irrelevant material, bitterly contests this. Sometimes massive impostor syndrome. Sometimes suffer from thinking they are an unrecognised brilliant. Will spend hours discussing exactly what is needed for an assignment rather than starting it. Also spends hours disputing feedback in great detail. Often upset about marks. Hard work to teach. Gets B's sometimes C's occasionally worse.
- The happy-go-lucky: average ability. Lots of friends. Does their best but doesn't go out of their way to put extra effort in. Never adds extra bells and whistles. Never complains about things, even when actually they have been hard done to. Always hands in on time saying "it is what it is", work always complete. Fun to be around, always cheerful, will happily call out bullshitters. Doesn't care if he or she is an impostor, they're having a good time. Great to teach. Gets B's or very high C's occasional A's.
- The struggler: below average ability or has difficult circumstances. Tries hard but just can't master the work. Hands in work on time, sometimes incomplete, gets bad feedback, gets demoralised further. Utterly devastated by bullshitters. Can get through if befriended by a slogger or a happy-go-lucky, if they don't have friends will find it very hard. Needs a sympathetic study group (ideally with a brilliant who is good at explaining things - they have time to help people). Dosen't seek enough help from lecturers (probably because they are embarrassed). Often obviously very unhappy. Frustrating to teach because of reluctance to ask for help. Gets C's or worse.
The most damaging of these is the perfectionist. Most students used to be happy-go-luckies. In the olden days when a 2.2 was a perfectly acceptable degree and a 3rd was a setback but not a disaster strugglers could be happy-go-luckies. Bullshitters have always been a pain. Brilliants are, at most, 1% of a cohort."