Were the English Lit questions yesterday more obscure than the ones last year? (I don't know which last year's were).
If they were, then I'm wondering if this how the exam boards intend to test in the essay-based subjects going forward: by asking questions that you'd have had to revise extremely hard for to have practised previously, so that being able to analyse and present an argument are truly being tested, rather than just a recital of what you've maybe had half-written for you by the teacher?
Its just a theory, but it will become clearer when we see the next english paper and, maybe, if the maths paper really goes for it with the non-obvious solution questions, then we'll know.